IB English Lit HL study plan
IB English Lit HL · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Readers, writers and texts - the nature of literary study, communication of meaning, and the relationship between text, author and reader
Define the three assessment-facing senses of 'meaning' (authorial intent, textual construction, reader response) and write a one-paragraph definition of each in your own words
Map your two or three studied works onto a grid of text, author and reader, noting for each work one claim about intent, one about form, and one about reception
Annotate ten short passages from your studied works, labelling the specific formal choice that produces meaning (diction, syntax, image pattern, narrative voice) rather than naming a theme
Draft three thesis statements that make an arguable claim about how a text communicates meaning, then test each against a counter-argument
Your checkpoint
A 600-word 'meaning map' document: definitions, the text-author-reader grid for each studied work, and ten annotated passages with formal labels.
Readers, writers and texts - the nature of literary study, communication of meaning, and the relationship between text, author and reader & Guided literary analysis of unseen texts (Paper 1 skills)
Practise close reading of unseen poetry under time: analyse two unseen poems in 40 minutes each, focusing on how structure and figurative language build meaning
Convert each timed analysis into a structured commentary with a controlling idea stated in the first two sentences
Identify and correct your three most frequent commentary habits (plot summary, feature-spotting, unearned evaluation) by rewriting flagged sentences
Build a personal checklist of formal elements to scan for in any unseen text within the first five minutes
Your checkpoint
Two full unseen-poetry commentaries (approximately 700 words each) plus a one-page self-edit log listing the sentence-level habits you corrected.
Time and space - the contextual, historical and cultural situatedness of literary works and their reception
Research and write a context brief for each studied work covering composition date, first publication and reception, and one contested critical reading
Distinguish contextual facts that genuinely shape interpretation from biographical trivia, and justify the distinction in writing
Compare how the same historical pressure (for example war, empire, class mobility or gender norms) appears differently in two of your works
Rehearse integrating context into an argument in no more than two sentences per paragraph without letting it replace analysis of the text
Your checkpoint
A context brief of 400 words per studied work, plus three model paragraphs that weave context into textual analysis in two sentences or fewer.
Time and space - the contextual, historical and cultural situatedness of literary works and their reception & Intertextuality: connecting texts - comparison of works across genre, period and form, and the dialogue between texts
Select three pairs of works from different genres or periods and state the precise basis of comparison for each pair
Draft comparison paragraphs that move point-by-point between texts rather than text-by-text, using explicit connectives of similarity and difference
Trace one literary motif across three works and show how each text transforms rather than repeats it
Write a timed comparative response of 60 minutes on a past-paper-style prompt you compose yourself
Your checkpoint
A comparative essay of 1,000 words on one work pair, structured point-by-point, with a short appendix justifying the three pairings you chose.
Intertextuality: connecting texts - comparison of works across genre, period and form, and the dialogue between texts & Guided literary analysis of unseen texts (Paper 1 skills)
Analyse two unseen prose extracts in 45 minutes each, attending to narrative perspective, tense and focalisation
Write a comparative commentary linking an unseen extract to a studied work on a single shared feature
Revise your Paper 1 checklist to cover prose-specific and drama-specific features alongside poetry
Self-mark both commentaries against IB-style criteria for understanding, interpretation and language, and log the gap between your judgement and your performance
Your checkpoint
Two timed unseen-prose commentaries with a completed self-marking rubric and a written diagnosis of your weakest criterion.
Comparative literary essay on studied works (Paper 2 skills) & Intertextuality: connecting texts - comparison of works across genre, period and form, and the dialogue between texts
Build a comparative essay plan bank of six prompts, each with a thesis, three comparative points and chosen textual evidence
Write one full comparative essay in 90 minutes under exam conditions using only annotated texts, no secondary sources
Convert your strongest comparative analysis into a global-issue framing by naming a broad, transferable issue and showing how both works explore it
Draft two candidate global issues and stress-test each against the requirement that it be genuinely present in both works
Your checkpoint
One timed comparative essay of 1,200 words plus a bank of six essay plans and two stress-tested global-issue statements.
Individual oral: global issue explored through two works (internal assessment) & Independent extended critical writing (HL Essay)
Script a ten-minute individual oral with a clear global issue, balanced treatment of two works, and at least six extract-grounded points
Rehearse the oral aloud twice, timing each section, and cut anything that summarises rather than analyses
Draft a research question for the HL Essay that is narrow, arguable and answerable from your chosen text alone
Outline the HL Essay in 1,200 words of structured notes with a line of argument, section headings and a source list
Your checkpoint
A recorded ten-minute oral with a timed section breakdown, plus a 300-word HL Essay proposal containing research question, line of argument and annotated bibliography.
Independent extended critical writing (HL Essay) & Comparative literary essay on studied works (Paper 2 skills) & Guided literary analysis of unseen texts (Paper 1 skills)
Write and revise one full HL Essay draft of 1,200 to 1,500 words, integrating at least three credible secondary sources into your own argument
Sit a full mock Paper 1 and Paper 2 back to back under timed conditions and self-mark both against the criteria
Consolidate a one-page revision sheet per studied work: key formal features, two contextual anchors, three quotable passages
Identify your three weakest criteria across all mocks and write a targeted action for each before the exam
Your checkpoint
A complete HL Essay draft of 1,200 to 1,500 words, two self-marked mock papers, and a one-page final revision sheet per studied work.
Milestones
Week 2: You can produce a structured commentary on an unseen poem in 40 minutes with a controlling idea in the opening two sentences, and you have named the three habits you are actively eliminating.
Week 4: You have written a 1,000-word comparison that moves point-by-point between texts, and you can articulate the basis of comparison for three work pairs without falling back on shared theme alone.
Week 6: You have completed one timed 90-minute comparative essay and hold a bank of six plans, each with a thesis and three comparative points supported by specific textual evidence.
Week 8: You have a full HL Essay draft of at least 1,200 words, a recorded ten-minute oral, and two self-marked mock papers with a written action plan for your three weakest criteria.