IB English Lit HL study materials
IB English Lit HL study resources

IB English Lit HL study plan

IB English Lit HL · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Readers, writers and texts - the nature of literary study, communication of meaning, and the relationship between text, author and reader

  • Define the three assessment-facing senses of 'meaning' (authorial intent, textual construction, reader response) and write a one-paragraph definition of each in your own words

  • Map your two or three studied works onto a grid of text, author and reader, noting for each work one claim about intent, one about form, and one about reception

  • Annotate ten short passages from your studied works, labelling the specific formal choice that produces meaning (diction, syntax, image pattern, narrative voice) rather than naming a theme

  • Draft three thesis statements that make an arguable claim about how a text communicates meaning, then test each against a counter-argument

Your checkpoint

A 600-word 'meaning map' document: definitions, the text-author-reader grid for each studied work, and ten annotated passages with formal labels.

Week 2

Readers, writers and texts - the nature of literary study, communication of meaning, and the relationship between text, author and reader & Guided literary analysis of unseen texts (Paper 1 skills)

  • Practise close reading of unseen poetry under time: analyse two unseen poems in 40 minutes each, focusing on how structure and figurative language build meaning

  • Convert each timed analysis into a structured commentary with a controlling idea stated in the first two sentences

  • Identify and correct your three most frequent commentary habits (plot summary, feature-spotting, unearned evaluation) by rewriting flagged sentences

  • Build a personal checklist of formal elements to scan for in any unseen text within the first five minutes

Your checkpoint

Two full unseen-poetry commentaries (approximately 700 words each) plus a one-page self-edit log listing the sentence-level habits you corrected.

Week 3

Time and space - the contextual, historical and cultural situatedness of literary works and their reception

  • Research and write a context brief for each studied work covering composition date, first publication and reception, and one contested critical reading

  • Distinguish contextual facts that genuinely shape interpretation from biographical trivia, and justify the distinction in writing

  • Compare how the same historical pressure (for example war, empire, class mobility or gender norms) appears differently in two of your works

  • Rehearse integrating context into an argument in no more than two sentences per paragraph without letting it replace analysis of the text

Your checkpoint

A context brief of 400 words per studied work, plus three model paragraphs that weave context into textual analysis in two sentences or fewer.

Week 4

Time and space - the contextual, historical and cultural situatedness of literary works and their reception & Intertextuality: connecting texts - comparison of works across genre, period and form, and the dialogue between texts

  • Select three pairs of works from different genres or periods and state the precise basis of comparison for each pair

  • Draft comparison paragraphs that move point-by-point between texts rather than text-by-text, using explicit connectives of similarity and difference

  • Trace one literary motif across three works and show how each text transforms rather than repeats it

  • Write a timed comparative response of 60 minutes on a past-paper-style prompt you compose yourself

Your checkpoint

A comparative essay of 1,000 words on one work pair, structured point-by-point, with a short appendix justifying the three pairings you chose.

Week 5

Intertextuality: connecting texts - comparison of works across genre, period and form, and the dialogue between texts & Guided literary analysis of unseen texts (Paper 1 skills)

  • Analyse two unseen prose extracts in 45 minutes each, attending to narrative perspective, tense and focalisation

  • Write a comparative commentary linking an unseen extract to a studied work on a single shared feature

  • Revise your Paper 1 checklist to cover prose-specific and drama-specific features alongside poetry

  • Self-mark both commentaries against IB-style criteria for understanding, interpretation and language, and log the gap between your judgement and your performance

Your checkpoint

Two timed unseen-prose commentaries with a completed self-marking rubric and a written diagnosis of your weakest criterion.

Week 6

Comparative literary essay on studied works (Paper 2 skills) & Intertextuality: connecting texts - comparison of works across genre, period and form, and the dialogue between texts

  • Build a comparative essay plan bank of six prompts, each with a thesis, three comparative points and chosen textual evidence

  • Write one full comparative essay in 90 minutes under exam conditions using only annotated texts, no secondary sources

  • Convert your strongest comparative analysis into a global-issue framing by naming a broad, transferable issue and showing how both works explore it

  • Draft two candidate global issues and stress-test each against the requirement that it be genuinely present in both works

Your checkpoint

One timed comparative essay of 1,200 words plus a bank of six essay plans and two stress-tested global-issue statements.

Week 7

Individual oral: global issue explored through two works (internal assessment) & Independent extended critical writing (HL Essay)

  • Script a ten-minute individual oral with a clear global issue, balanced treatment of two works, and at least six extract-grounded points

  • Rehearse the oral aloud twice, timing each section, and cut anything that summarises rather than analyses

  • Draft a research question for the HL Essay that is narrow, arguable and answerable from your chosen text alone

  • Outline the HL Essay in 1,200 words of structured notes with a line of argument, section headings and a source list

Your checkpoint

A recorded ten-minute oral with a timed section breakdown, plus a 300-word HL Essay proposal containing research question, line of argument and annotated bibliography.

Week 8

Independent extended critical writing (HL Essay) & Comparative literary essay on studied works (Paper 2 skills) & Guided literary analysis of unseen texts (Paper 1 skills)

  • Write and revise one full HL Essay draft of 1,200 to 1,500 words, integrating at least three credible secondary sources into your own argument

  • Sit a full mock Paper 1 and Paper 2 back to back under timed conditions and self-mark both against the criteria

  • Consolidate a one-page revision sheet per studied work: key formal features, two contextual anchors, three quotable passages

  • Identify your three weakest criteria across all mocks and write a targeted action for each before the exam

Your checkpoint

A complete HL Essay draft of 1,200 to 1,500 words, two self-marked mock papers, and a one-page final revision sheet per studied work.

Milestones

Week 2: You can produce a structured commentary on an unseen poem in 40 minutes with a controlling idea in the opening two sentences, and you have named the three habits you are actively eliminating.

Week 4: You have written a 1,000-word comparison that moves point-by-point between texts, and you can articulate the basis of comparison for three work pairs without falling back on shared theme alone.

Week 6: You have completed one timed 90-minute comparative essay and hold a bank of six plans, each with a thesis and three comparative points supported by specific textual evidence.

Week 8: You have a full HL Essay draft of at least 1,200 words, a recorded ten-minute oral, and two self-marked mock papers with a written action plan for your three weakest criteria.