watsonx Data Scientist - Associate study plan
watsonx Data Scientist - Associate · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Foundation Models and Prompt Engineering in watsonx.ai
Map the watsonx.ai Prompt Lab interface: identify where to select a foundation model, set decoding parameters, and save a prompt asset, then record the exact click path in your notes
Explain in writing the difference between foundation models tuned for generation versus encoder models used for extraction, and name at least three model families available in watsonx.ai with one typical use case each
Experiment with temperature, top_p, and max tokens on the same prompt and document how each parameter shifts output length and variability across five runs
Draft ten prompt variants for a single extraction task and rank them by output quality using a simple rubric you define
Your checkpoint
A one-page prompt engineering cheat sheet plus a log of 10 prompt variants with parameter settings and quality scores
Foundation Models and Prompt Engineering in watsonx.ai & Model Development, Tuning, and Deployment in watsonx.ai
Apply few-shot prompting and chain-of-thought patterns to two tasks and compare accuracy against zero-shot baselines
Configure a prompt template with variable placeholders in Prompt Lab and test it against at least three different input values
Describe how tokenization affects cost and context limits, and calculate approximate token counts for a sample document
Identify the guardrails and content-filtering options available when running prompts and note what each blocks
Your checkpoint
A comparison table of zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought results on two tasks with accuracy notes
Model Development, Tuning, and Deployment in watsonx.ai
Walk through the model development lifecycle in watsonx.ai from project creation to deployment and sketch it as a diagram
Create a project, associate a runtime instance, and confirm you can open a notebook and run a cell against the environment
Compare tuning approaches (prompt tuning versus full fine-tuning) on cost, data requirements, and expected quality gains
Prepare a small instruction-style training dataset in the required JSONL format and validate its structure
Your checkpoint
A working project with a validated tuning dataset and a lifecycle diagram covering build, tune, evaluate, deploy
Python and Notebook Workflows with the watsonx SDKs & Model Development, Tuning, and Deployment in watsonx.ai
Install and authenticate the watsonx SDKs in a notebook using an API key and project ID, and confirm a successful client call
Write code to list available foundation models and generate text programmatically with specified parameters
Deploy a tuned or prompted model to a deployment endpoint and invoke it from a notebook with a sample payload
Handle common SDK errors such as authentication failures and token limits by adding basic retry and error handling
Your checkpoint
A runnable notebook that authenticates, lists models, generates text, deploys a model, and calls the endpoint end to end
AutoAI and Machine Learning Pipelines
Run an AutoAI experiment on a tabular dataset and interpret the pipeline leaderboard, including how preprocessing steps are ranked
Explain the difference between AutoAI and manual pipeline construction and identify when each is appropriate
Inspect a generated pipeline, identify the winning estimator, and note which hyperparameters were tuned
Save and deploy the best AutoAI pipeline, then score new records against it
Your checkpoint
An AutoAI experiment report with leaderboard screenshot notes, winning pipeline description, and scoring output for new records
Generative AI Applications, RAG, and Agents & Data Preparation and Governance with watsonx.data and watsonx.governance
Build a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline that chunks documents, embeds them, stores vectors, and retrieves relevant passages for a query
Compare chunking strategies and embedding choices, and document retrieval quality on at least five test questions
Connect watsonx.data as a data source and query it from a notebook or the console to confirm connectivity
Explain how watsonx.governance tracks model factsheets and risk metadata across the lifecycle
Your checkpoint
A working RAG demo notebook with retrieval evaluation notes for five questions and a documented data source connection
Model Monitoring, Evaluation, and Responsible AI & Data Preparation and Governance with watsonx.data and watsonx.governance
Define evaluation metrics for both generative and predictive models and apply at least three to a sample model
Set up a model evaluation run in watsonx.governance and interpret the fairness and drift outputs
Identify bias detection metrics and describe when each is appropriate for a classification model
Document how factsheets, model cards, and approval workflows support responsible AI governance
Your checkpoint
An evaluation report covering accuracy, fairness, and drift results with a short responsible AI governance summary
watsonx Platform Fundamentals and Architecture & Model Monitoring, Evaluation, and Responsible AI
Diagram the watsonx platform architecture showing how watsonx.ai, watsonx.data, and watsonx.governance interact with shared services
Complete a timed 60-question practice set across all eight domains and log weak areas by domain
Re-review the two lowest-scoring domains using your own notes and rewrite the weakest concept in plain language
Build a one-page exam-day reference of key terms, SDK calls, and governance concepts
Your checkpoint
A scored practice exam with a per-domain error log and a one-page final reference sheet
Milestones
Week 2: You can write a few-shot prompt from scratch, explain decoding parameters without notes, and articulate why one prompt outperforms another
Week 4: Your notebook authenticates with the SDK, generates text, and successfully calls a deployed model endpoint without manual intervention
Week 6: Your RAG pipeline retrieves relevant passages for at least four of five test questions and you can explain each stage of the flow
Week 8: You score at least 80 percent on the timed practice set and can name your two weakest domains with a concrete remediation plan