Related-Party Sale at a Discount and the Missing Resolutions
Zenith Components Limited is an unlisted public company with paid-up equity capital of ₹15 crore and turnover of ₹140 crore for the year ended 31 March 2024. On 12 June 2024 its Board considered a proposal to sell finished components worth ₹18 crore over the next twelve months to Meridian Traders, a partnership firm in which the wife of Ramesh Iyer, a whole-time director and the chairman of that meeting, is a partner. The price fixed was 22 per cent below the rate charged to other dealers. Ramesh Iyer answered the directors' questions, withdrew, and the remaining three directors approved the proposal. The company has a three-member audit committee, but the proposal was never placed before it. No resolution of members was passed, and the contract was signed on 20 June 2024. The statutory auditors have flagged the transaction in their report, and the Board now wants to know what can still be corrected and who is exposed.
1. Is the sale to Meridian Traders a related-party transaction, and if so, which approvals were required before 20 June 2024 and in what order?
Read the worked answer
Step 1 - Is Meridian a related party? Under section 2(76)(iii) a firm in which a director, manager or his relative is a partner is a related party. A spouse is a relative under section 2(77) read with Rule 4 of the Companies (Specification of Definitions Details) Rules, 2014. Meridian is therefore a related party of Zenith, even though Mr. Iyer is not himself a partner.
Step 2 - Does section 188 apply? Section 188 exempts only transactions in the ordinary course of business and on an arm's length basis. The sale of components is in the ordinary course, but the 22 per cent discount means it is not at arm's length, so the exemption fails and section 188 is attracted.
Step 3 - Board consent. A resolution at a meeting of the Board was required. It was passed, but only validly if the interested director disclosed his interest under section 184(2) and abstained; his answer-and-withdraw conduct should be recorded in the minutes.
Step 4 - Member approval. Prior approval by ordinary resolution was necessary because the paid-up capital (₹15 crore) is not less than ₹10 crore and because the sale value (₹18 crore) exceeds 10 per cent of turnover (₹14 crore) under Rule 15(3). The explanatory statement must disclose the name of the related party, the relationship and the pricing basis, and no related-party member may vote. This approval was never taken.
Step 5 - Audit committee. Section 177 applies (capital of ₹10 crore or more; turnover of ₹100 crore or more) and section 177(4)(iv) requires audit committee approval, with omnibus approval available only for arm's length, ordinary-course transactions - unavailable here.
Conclusion. Three defects exist: non-arm's length pricing, no audit committee approval, and no prior member resolution.
2. What are the consequences of the non-compliance for the company and for Mr. Iyer, and can the transaction still be ratified?
Read the worked answer
Voidability and ratification. A contract entered into without the required Board consent or member approval, and not ratified within three months, is voidable at the option of the Board or of the shareholders. The three-month window ran from 20 June 2024 and expired on 20 September 2024. Since ratification did not happen within that window, the Board can now avoid the contract; a resolution passed in 2025 cannot retrospectively validate it as a section 188 ratification.
Indemnity. Where the contract is with a related party of a director, the directors concerned must indemnify the company against any loss. If Zenith continues to supply at 22 per cent below market price, the loss is measurable and Mr. Iyer is exposed on that indemnity, independently of any penalty.
Penalties. Section 188(5) penalises the company and every officer in default who entered into the contract - currently ₹5 lakh on the company and ₹25 lakh on each such officer.
Other exposure. Non-disclosure of interest can also attract vacation of office under section 167(1)(c)/(d), and the directors' general duties under section 166 (good faith, no undue gain) are engaged because the pricing transfers value out of the company.
Practical answer. The Board should place the matter before the audit committee immediately, re-price the balance of the contract to arm's length, record the committee's omnibus approval for future ordinary-course supplies, and either terminate the existing contract or accept the loss and recover it from Mr. Iyer.
3. Mr. Iyer proposes that the Board pass a ratifying resolution now and that the shareholders ratify the contract at the next annual general meeting. Will that cure the defects?
Read the worked answer
Partially at best, and not for the audit committee lapse. Ratification under section 188 is a time-bound remedy: it must be completed within three months of entering into the contract, failing which the contract becomes voidable at the option of the Board or the shareholders. A late ratification reverses the statutory sequence and leaves the contract vulnerable.
Member approval cannot be a formality. Even a properly convened resolution cannot be carried with the votes of the related-party member (the firm's partners or the director's relatives holding shares, if any), and the explanatory statement must set out the pricing basis. Here the price is 22 per cent below market, so the resolution would have to justify that discount on commercial grounds; an unexplained discount is itself evidence of a breach of the directors' duty under section 166 to act in the best interests of the company.
The audit committee defect is independent. Section 177(4)(iv) approval is a separate statutory requirement and is not capable of being cured by a shareholders' resolution. Omnibus approval is available only prospectively and only for transactions in the ordinary course and at arm's length.
Conclusion. A retrospective ratification is not a cure. The compliant route is: audit committee approval of the revised pricing, a fresh board resolution recording the interest, and - for the balance of the contract - a properly noticed member resolution with a full explanatory statement, or termination of the existing contract.