Idaho Bar flashcards
Idaho Bar · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Complete diversity
- Requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 that no plaintiff share state citizenship with any defendant; minimal diversity is insufficient, and the amount in controversy must exceed $75,000.
- Supplemental jurisdiction
- Federal court power under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 over claims sharing a common nucleus of operative fact with an anchor claim, limited by § 1367(b) in diversity cases.
- Erie doctrine
- Federal courts apply state substantive law and federal procedural law; in the absence of a federal rule, courts balance forum shopping against inequitable administration of the laws.
- Claim preclusion elements
- A final judgment on the merits, identity of parties or their privies, and the same claim or cause of action, barring relitigation of claims that were or could have been raised.
- Standing elements
- Injury in fact that is concrete and particularized, causation fairly traceable to the defendant, and redressability by a favorable court decision.
- Strict scrutiny
- Standard for suspect classifications and fundamental rights; the government must show a compelling interest and narrow tailoring, and the law is usually invalidated.
- Dormant Commerce Clause
- Judicial doctrine invalidating state laws that discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce absent a legitimate local purpose that cannot be served by nondiscriminatory alternatives.
- State action doctrine
- Constitutional constraints on private conduct apply only where there is significant government involvement, such as public function, entanglement, or joint action with the state.
- UCC 2-207 battle of the forms
- A definite expression of acceptance operates as acceptance even with additional terms unless expressly conditional; merchants' additional terms enter unless material or objected to.
- Merchant confirmatory memorandum
- Under UCC § 2-201(b), a signed writing confirming a contract binds a merchant who receives it and fails to object within 10 days.
- Anticipatory repudiation
- A clear indication before performance is due that a party will not perform, giving the nonbreaching party an immediate claim and the right to await performance.
- Hadley v. Baxendale
- Consequential damages are recoverable only if foreseeable at the time of contracting as the probable result of breach, or within the parties' contemplation.
- Felony murder limitation
- The felony must be independent of the killing, inherently dangerous or enumerated, and the death foreseeable; agency or proximate cause theories limit co-felon liability.
- Attempt substantial step
- Specific intent to commit the target crime plus conduct strongly corroborative of that intent, beyond mere preparation; factual impossibility is generally no defense.
- Miranda custody requirement
- Warnings are required before interrogation when a reasonable person would not feel free to leave; traffic stops and routine booking questions generally are not custodial.
- Strickland standard
- Sixth Amendment ineffective assistance requires deficient performance by counsel and a reasonable probability that the result would have differed but for the deficiency.
- Rule 403 balancing
- Relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, or waste of time.
- Crawford confrontation rule
- Testimonial hearsay is inadmissible unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine.
- Excited utterance
- A statement relating to a startling event made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement, admissible regardless of the declarant's availability.
- Prior inconsistent statements
- Statements inconsistent with testimony are admissible for impeachment; if given under oath at a proceeding, they are substantive evidence under Rule 801(d)(1)(A).
- Res ipsa loquitur
- An inference of negligence arises when the accident ordinarily does not occur absent negligence, the instrumentality was in the defendant's exclusive control, and the plaintiff did not contribute.
- Comparative negligence
- A plaintiff's recovery is reduced by the percentage of fault; modified versions bar recovery when fault exceeds 50 or 51 percent, while pure versions permit recovery regardless.
- Actual malice standard
- Public figures suing for defamation must prove knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth by clear and convincing evidence under New York Times v. Sullivan.
- Products design defect
- A product is defective when a reasonable alternative design would have reduced foreseeable risk without impairing utility, judged under risk-utility balancing.
- Joint tenancy unities
- Requires time, title, interest, and possession unities plus the right of survivorship; severance by conveyance converts the interest to a tenancy in common.
- Prescriptive easement
- An easement acquired by open, notorious, adverse, continuous use of another's land for the statutory period, without exclusivity or payment of taxes.
- Race-notice recording statute
- Protects a subsequent purchaser who takes without notice of a prior interest and records first; notice includes actual, inquiry, and record notice.
- Adverse possession elements
- Actual, exclusive, continuous, open and notorious, and hostile possession for the statutory period, with tacking permitted among successive possessors.
- Apparent authority
- A principal's manifestations to a third party reasonably lead the third party to believe the agent has authority, binding the principal to the transaction.
- Business judgment rule
- A presumption that directors acted on an informed basis, in good faith, and in the honest belief the action served the corporation's best interests.
- Charging order
- The exclusive remedy of a judgment creditor against an LLC member's interest, permitting distributions but not management rights or foreclosure on the interest.
- Best interests of the child
- The governing custody standard, weighing factors such as stability, parental fitness, the child's preferences, and the child's adjustment to home, school, and community.