Costing an IUP Offer: Group 5 Plus a Flat Program Fee on a Fixed Salary
Sinta has been admitted to IUP Management. The fee schedule she received lists UKT groups 1–8; IUP students are placed in the income-assessed group but may not be placed below group 4. The group amounts per semester are: group 4 Rp 6,000,000; group 5 Rp 9,000,000; group 6 Rp 12,500,000; group 7 Rp 16,000,000. On top of UKT, IUP students pay a flat program fee of Rp 18,000,000 per semester. The schedule allows payment in three instalments per semester with a 1.5% administrative charge on each instalment.
Sinta's household: her father is a civil servant with take-home pay of Rp 9,500,000 per month; her mother runs a small catering business with a net income of about Rp 2,500,000 per month but no formal payslip; two younger siblings are still in school; the family pays Rp 2,200,000 per month in mortgage instalments. Family savings total Rp 40,000,000. The UKT appeal window opens for two weeks after the announcement and requires income evidence. Sinta has been placed in group 5.
1. Compute the annual cost at group 5 and test whether the household can carry it from current income.
Read the worked answer
Per semester: UKT group 5 Rp 9,000,000 + program fee Rp 18,000,000 = Rp 27,000,000. Per year (two semesters): Rp 54,000,000, which implies Rp 4,500,000 must be set aside every month.
Now the income side. Take-home income is Rp 9,500,000 + Rp 2,500,000 = Rp 12,000,000 per month. Subtract the mortgage of Rp 2,200,000, leaving Rp 9,800,000 before living costs for a household of five. If living costs are in the range of Rp 6,000,000, the monthly surplus is about Rp 3,800,000 - roughly Rp 700,000 short of the Rp 4,500,000 requirement. Over a year that gap is about Rp 8,400,000.
So savings of Rp 40,000,000 cover less than one year of the Rp 54,000,000 cost. The correct conclusion is not 'the family cannot afford it' but 'the family can fund year one from savings while the shortfall runs at about Rp 700,000 per month, which is unsustainable beyond roughly four to five years.' Action is required now, not at the start of year two: either a lower UKT group, an instalment structure that matches the mother's uneven catering income, or a scholarship application.
2. Should the family appeal for a lower group, and what evidence would actually move the assessor?
Read the worked answer
Yes, appeal - but calibrate the expectation first. The floor is group 4, so the maximum possible gain is group 5 minus group 4, i.e. Rp 9,000,000 − Rp 6,000,000 = Rp 3,000,000 per semester, or Rp 6,000,000 per year. That is meaningful against a Rp 700,000 monthly shortfall but it does not close the gap; the appeal is one lever among three.
What moves the assessor is verifiable evidence of the household's actual position, not a narrative of hardship: the father's salary slip and employment letter (SK), the family card showing three dependants, the mortgage statement, and a property tax or electricity bill that corroborates household size and consumption. The difficult item is the mother's catering income, which is informal. A single self-written declaration is weak because the applicant's family is the interested party. Six months of order books, purchase invoices, or a statement of income countersigned by the neighbourhood head (RT/RW) gives the assessor something to verify and prevents an imputed figure being set higher than reality.
A realistic outcome is a drop to group 4 and an approved instalment plan - worth doing within the two-week window, but not a solution on its own.
3. Evaluate the three-instalment option economically. Should the family use it even though it carries a charge?
Read the worked answer
Per semester the total is Rp 27,000,000, split into three instalments of Rp 9,000,000. At 1.5% per instalment the charge is Rp 135,000 each, so Rp 405,000 per semester and Rp 810,000 per year - about 1.5% of the annual fee.
The economics depend on what the alternative is. If paying in full means drawing savings down to near zero, the instalment charge buys liquidity insurance at a low price and is clearly worth it: Rp 810,000 is small against the risk of having no cash buffer for an emergency. If the family would otherwise hold the money in a savings account, compare Rp 810,000 per year against the interest actually earned on the money held back - at roughly 4% per year on an average balance of about Rp 13,500,000 that is around Rp 540,000, so the instalment charge slightly exceeds the interest forgone and paying in full wins on pure cost.
The better framing is cash flow, not interest: the mother's catering income is uneven, so instalment dates should be aligned to her seasonal peaks. A 1.5% charge to avoid missing a payment deadline - and the academic consequences that follow - is cheap.