UM UNESA study plan
UM UNESA · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Tes Potensi Skolastik
Map the Tes Potensi Skolastik subtest structure (verbal, numerical, figural, and reasoning components) and record the exact item format and timing for each
Diagnose baseline accuracy in verbal reasoning (analogy, synonym-antonym, relationship classification) by completing 40 timed items and logging error types
Build a personal error taxonomy with at least five recurring mistake categories and assign each wrong answer to one
Establish a weekly study log template that tracks hours, items attempted, accuracy, and review status
Your checkpoint
A one-page diagnostic report listing baseline accuracy per TPS subtest, your five error categories, and a completed study log template
Tes Potensi Skolastik
Drill numerical reasoning: number series, arithmetic word problems, and quantitative comparison, targeting 80 items with written solution paths
Memorize and apply core shortcuts for ratios, percentages, averages, and unit conversion without a calculator
Reduce average time per numerical item to under 90 seconds while keeping accuracy above 70 percent
Review every wrong item from week 1 and rewrite the correct reasoning in your own words
Your checkpoint
A 60-item numerical reasoning set completed under time, with a written solution for every incorrect answer
Tes Potensi Skolastik
Practice figural and spatial reasoning: pattern completion, rotation, mirroring, and sequence continuation across 50 items
Apply a systematic scanning routine to diagram-based items so no option is skipped
Combine verbal, numerical, and figural items into a single 60-minute mixed set to practice switching cognitive modes
Identify your two weakest TPS subtests and schedule targeted review blocks for them
Your checkpoint
A timed 60-minute mixed TPS simulation with a score breakdown by subtest and a prioritized weakness list
Tes Potensi Skolastik & Penalaran Matematika
Complete a full-length TPS simulation under exam conditions and record section-by-section timing
Analyze Penalaran Matematika item types (data interpretation, quantitative comparison, applied problem solving) and note the reasoning chain each requires
Solve 30 Penalaran Matematika items involving tables, charts, and multi-step word problems
Set a target score per domain and convert it into a required accuracy rate for practice sets
Your checkpoint
A full TPS simulation score report plus a written target-accuracy table for all four domains
Penalaran Matematika
Master data interpretation from tables, bar charts, line graphs, and pie charts across 40 items
Translate word problems into equations reliably, covering rates, mixtures, work, and sequential change problems
Practice estimation and answer-elimination strategies to cut solving time on multi-step items
Log every arithmetic slip separately from conceptual errors to distinguish speed problems from knowledge gaps
Your checkpoint
A 50-item Penalaran Matematika set with a split error log separating computational slips from conceptual gaps
Penalaran Matematika & Literasi Bahasa Indonesia
Complete a timed Penalaran Matematika simulation and reach at least 75 percent accuracy
Analyze Literasi Bahasa Indonesia passage types (expository, argumentative, narrative) and identify the question stems each typically carries
Practice finding main idea, inference, author purpose, and tone across 8 passages with written justification for each answer
Build a vocabulary and connective-word list for academic Indonesian to speed passage comprehension
Your checkpoint
A passage-analysis workbook covering 8 Indonesian texts with main idea, inference, and purpose answers justified in writing
Literasi Bahasa Indonesia & Literasi Bahasa Inggris
Drill English reading comprehension: main idea, detail retrieval, inference, vocabulary in context, and author attitude across 8 passages
Review English grammar and structure items covering tense, agreement, connectors, and sentence completion
Practice skimming and scanning routines that locate evidence before reading answer options
Compare performance between Indonesian and English literacy sets and reallocate time to the weaker one
Your checkpoint
A comparative literacy report with accuracy per question type for both languages and a revised time-allocation plan
Tes Potensi Skolastik & Literasi Bahasa Indonesia & Literasi Bahasa Inggris & Penalaran Matematika
Complete two full-length simulations across all four domains under strict timing
Review every flagged and incorrect item from all eight weeks and confirm each error category is closed or documented
Rehearse exam-day logistics: section order, time checkpoints, and a rule for when to skip and return
Finalize a one-page formula, strategy, and vocabulary summary sheet for last-day review
Your checkpoint
Two full simulation score reports showing improvement over the week 4 baseline, plus a finalized one-page review sheet
Milestones
Week 2: Numerical reasoning accuracy reaches at least 70 percent at under 90 seconds per item, verified by a timed 60-item set
Week 4: Full TPS simulation completed with a per-subtest score breakdown and a written target-accuracy table for all four domains
Week 6: Penalaran Matematika accuracy reaches at least 75 percent on a timed simulation, and 8 Indonesian passages analyzed with written justifications
Week 8: Both full-length simulations score above the week 4 baseline in every domain, and the one-page review sheet is complete