Unit 12's Water Heater: Deductible, Declaration, and Thirty More Heaters
Lakeview Terrace is an 88-unit townhome association. In February a water heater in Unit 12 failed at 2 a.m.; water soaked the drywall of two adjoining units and ruined common-element hallway carpet. The heater was 14 years old, and the association has no policy on water heater inspection or replacement. The plumber reports the unit had no expansion tank, now required for replacements under the local code, and that 30 other units have the same model and vintage. The master policy carries a $25,000 water-damage deductible. Unit 12's HO-6 has a $2,500 deductible, $50,000 personal property coverage, and $10,000 loss assessment coverage. The declaration says owners maintain unit interiors and the association maintains common elements, but it is silent on damage caused by an owner's appliance.
1. Who pays for what? Identify the analysis and the documents you need.
Read the worked answer
Three layers answer this, and fault is only one of them.
Layer 1 - the master policy. Read the definition of covered property and the deductible clause. The master policy responds to common-element damage (hallway carpet, common drywall) and, depending on how it is written, to unit interiors as originally built. The $25,000 deductible attaches to the association's claim.
Layer 2 - the HO-6. It responds to the owner's improvements, personal property, and any assessment charged back to the unit - but only up to $10,000 of loss assessment coverage, which is likely insufficient against a $25,000 deductible allocation.
Layer 3 - the declaration. This governs allocation between association and owner, and here it is silent on damage from an owner's appliance. Silence means default rules and counsel's opinion, not a manager's guess. Look specifically for a damage-chargeback or negligence clause and for any waiver-of-subrogation provision in the policy - if the insurer has waived subrogation against unit owners, chasing Unit 12 may be inconsistent with the coverage the association bought.
Practical step: the board should adopt a written deductible-allocation policy now, before the next loss, deciding in advance whether the deductible is charged to the responsible unit when fault is established or absorbed by the association. Deciding after the fact, unit by unit, looks arbitrary.
2. Thirty other units have the same heater. Build the risk response and the budget case for the board.
Read the worked answer
Treat this as a known, quantified risk rather than an isolated loss.
Survey. Inventory all 88 units: heater age, model, presence of a pan, expansion tank, shutoff valve, and braided supply lines. Publish the aggregate, not a list of names.
Program design. Written notice with a deadline; a phase-in replacement schedule (mandatory replacement at a stated age, voluntary earlier with a group-purchase discount); require a pan, an expansion tank, and a shutoff on every replacement, consistent with the code the plumber cited; consider automatic leak shutoff valves at riser points. If the association will ever own or replace these components, add them to the reserve study as a line item.
Budget math. Frame the choice as cost avoidance: the program costs a known amount per unit, while each unmitigated failure carries a $25,000 deductible exposure plus premium pressure at renewal - carriers surcharge or non-renew associations with repeated water losses.
Authority check. The board can adopt a reasonable inspection rule only if the declaration permits entry and rulemaking. It cannot unilaterally shift interior maintenance obligations to owners. Verify entry-notice requirements under state law before scheduling inspections.
3. What should owners be told, and what should the board ask its insurance agent?
Read the worked answer
Communication after the loss is where the association's credibility is set.
Tell owners, in plain language: what the master policy covers and what it does not (typically unit improvements and betterments and personal property are excluded); what a deductible actually means, with a concrete example - a $40,000 water loss leaves $25,000 to be allocated somewhere, and that somewhere is usually the association or the responsible owner; and why every owner should carry an HO-6 policy with loss assessment coverage at or above the master deductible, not the $10,000 that Unit 12 carries.
Ask the agent - in writing: the exact scope of covered property, the deductible structure by peril (water may differ from wind), whether subrogation against unit owners is waived, whether there is any ordinance-or-law coverage now that code requires expansion tanks, and the claims-history effect of reporting versus paying small losses out of pocket.
The manager's role is to coordinate and document, not to interpret coverage. Put the agent's answers and the board's deductible-allocation policy in the minutes so the next loss is handled by policy rather than by negotiation.