JC Geography study materials
JC Geography study resources

Copper dependence and a proposed special economic zone

JC Geography · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Copper dependence and a proposed special economic zone

Country X has 14 million people. Copper is 58% of goods exports, 31% of government revenue and 7% of GDP, but only 2.5% of employment. GDP per capita is US$6,800 and the Gini coefficient is 0.52. The economy grew 4.8% in 2022, but manufacturing is 9% of GDP, down from 14% in 2005. 54% of workers are informal. The government plans a US$2.1 billion special economic zone with tax holidays for foreign electronics firms, funded by a copper-backed loan. Opponents want the money spent on technical education and rural roads. The SEZ site is 22 km from the port, but the power supply fails 8 days a month and only 38% of the local workforce has completed secondary education.

1. Assess the vulnerability of Country X's development to a fall in copper prices.

Read the worked answer

Vulnerability is high because copper affects the economy through several channels at once, not just through mining jobs.

  • Export earnings: copper is 58% of goods exports. A price fall reduces foreign exchange earnings, which limits imports of fuel, machinery and consumer goods.
  • Government revenue: copper contributes 31% of government revenue. A price fall would force spending cuts or borrowing, affecting education, health and the proposed loan repayment.
  • GDP and growth: mining is 7% of GDP, so a price fall would directly slow growth. The 4.8% growth rate is therefore more fragile than it appears.
  • Employment: only 2.5% of workers are directly employed in mining, so direct job losses would be limited. But the fiscal channel would hit the 54% informal workforce through lower public spending, and the Gini coefficient of 0.52 suggests that the poor are least able to absorb the shock.
  • Limited diversification: manufacturing has fallen from 14% to 9% of GDP, so there is no large export sector to offset a copper decline.

Judgement: the economy is a classic resource-dependent economy. The small employment share does not mean low vulnerability, because the state budget and foreign exchange depend heavily on copper. A price fall would be transmitted through fiscal and macroeconomic channels even if few miners lose jobs.

2. Evaluate the SEZ proposal against the alternative of technical education and rural roads.

Read the worked answer

SEZ strengths:

  • The site is 22 km from the port, which is good for exporting electronics.
  • Tax holidays and a dedicated zone could attract foreign investment, create formal jobs and begin diversification away from copper.
  • Electronics can raise manufacturing's share of GDP and provide foreign exchange.

SEZ weaknesses:

  • Power fails 8 days a month, which is a serious obstacle for electronics assembly. Firms may need their own generators, raising costs.
  • Only 38% of the local workforce has completed secondary education, so firms may bring in skilled workers or find the skills shortage a deterrent.
  • Tax holidays reduce the revenue that is meant to repay a copper-backed loan. If copper prices fall, the loan becomes harder to service.
  • The zone may become an enclave, importing components and repatriating profits, with weak links to local firms.

Education and rural roads:

  • They address binding constraints: skills and market access. Roads help farmers and rural firms reach markets; technical education raises the supply of workers.
  • They are slower and may not attract foreign investment on their own, but they make the SEZ more likely to succeed.

Judgement: the options are not mutually exclusive. The SEZ is unlikely to work well while power is unreliable and skills are low. A defensible strategy is to fix power and expand technical education first, then phase the SEZ with performance requirements. Spending the entire US$2.1 billion on tax holidays would be risky.

3. Explain how the multiplier effect might differ between the SEZ and the rural roads.

Read the worked answer

The multiplier depends on how much of each initial spend is re-spent locally rather than leaking abroad.

SEZ:

  • Foreign electronics firms may import components, machinery and even managers, so a large share of each dollar leaves the country.
  • Tax holidays mean the government captures less revenue, reducing the public spending that could circulate locally.
  • Repatriated profits are a leakage.
  • However, local wages, construction, catering and transport can create some local multiplier, especially if the zone buys services from nearby firms.

Rural roads:

  • Construction spending employs local labour and suppliers, so more of the initial spend may stay in the region.
  • Better roads lower transport costs for farmers and traders, raising incomes and allowing more local spending.
  • But if farmers sell raw crops abroad and buy imported inputs, some of the gain leaks out. The multiplier is stronger if processing and retailing are local.

Judgement: the SEZ may have a higher gross investment but a lower local multiplier because of imported inputs and tax holidays. Rural roads may have a smaller initial spend but a higher local share, especially if they link farmers to local markets. The comparison should therefore use net local value added, not just the size of the investment.