LC Business study materials
LC Business study resources

Fitzgerald Foods: Pricing the New Free-From Range

LC Business · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Fitzgerald Foods: Pricing the New Free-From Range

Fitzgerald Foods is a family bakery in Cork. It plans to launch a gluten-free bread range through 40 SuperValu and Tesco stores. Additional fixed costs are €48,000 a year; variable cost is €2.15 per loaf; capacity is 60,000 loaves a year. The retail price options are €4.50 or €4.99. Retailers require a 35% gross margin, so the wholesale price would be €2.925 or €3.244 respectively. A competitor’s branded loaf retails at €4.49, and supermarket own-brand gluten-free bread is €3.99. Fitzgerald’s has no brand recognition in free-from. The sales manager favours €4.50 to win listings; the finance manager favours €4.99 because the lower price barely breaks even. The company has €25,000 available for launch marketing. A listing decision is needed in four weeks, and the retailer will review performance after six months.

1. Calculate the break-even volume at each retail price and assess whether the launch is viable within capacity.

Read the worked answer

At €4.50 retail, the retailer keeps 35%, so Fitzgerald’s wholesale price is €4.50 × 0.65 = €2.925. Contribution per loaf = €2.925 − €2.15 = €0.775. Break-even = €48,000 ÷ €0.775 = 61,935 loaves, which exceeds capacity of 60,000. At €4.99, wholesale = €4.99 × 0.65 = €3.2435. Contribution = €3.2435 − €2.15 = €1.0935. Break-even = €48,000 ÷ €1.0935 = 43,897 loaves. At €4.99 the launch is viable within capacity, with a margin of safety of about 16,103 loaves, or 27% of capacity. At €4.50 it cannot break even even at full capacity, before marketing costs. The calculation assumes the 35% margin is taken on retail price and that all loaves produced are sold; if wastage is 5%, the effective break-even rises further, making €4.50 clearly unviable.

2. Recommend a pricing strategy, considering price skimming, penetration pricing, and the competitive context.

Read the worked answer

A penetration price of €4.50 is risky because it cannot cover fixed costs at full capacity. It might win listings, but the more the company sells, the more it loses on each loaf above the break-even gap. A pure skimming price above €4.99 is also hard to justify: Fitzgerald’s has no free-from brand recognition, and the competitor is at €4.49. Recommendation: launch at €4.99 with a strong trial-building campaign, using the €25,000 for in-store sampling, shelf talkers and a money-back guarantee rather than a permanent price cut. That price covers fixed costs at about 44,000 loaves and leaves room for six-month retailer review. If the retailer insists on €4.50, Fitzgerald’s should first reduce variable cost to below €2.10 or negotiate a lower retailer margin, otherwise the listing destroys value. A temporary promotional price of €4.50 for the first eight weeks could be funded from marketing, but only with a planned return to €4.99 and clear sales triggers.

3. Discuss non-price factors that will determine whether the range succeeds.

Read the worked answer

Taste and texture are critical: gluten-free consumers will not repeat-purchase a product that is dry or crumbly, so sampling and blind testing matter more than a small price difference. Packaging must communicate certification, allergen safety and provenance clearly, because free-from shoppers are heavy label readers. Shelf position beside established brands and own-brand products affects trial; Fitzgerald’s should negotiate secondary display space. Staff training and retailer relationships influence replenishment and promotion. The competitor can respond with price cuts or a new listing, so Fitzgerald’s needs a point of difference such as a family bakery story, local sourcing or a softer loaf. Online reviews and social media will amplify early feedback. Finally, capacity of 60,000 loaves leaves limited room for growth; if demand exceeds supply, the company must decide whether to add a shift or ration distribution, and that decision should be made before launch rather than during the retailer’s six-month review.