The Anonymous Poem 'Shekel': Allusion or Identity Crisis?
An ulpan class is analyzing an unseen poem for the literature paper. The poem, 'שֶׁקֶל', is printed without an author's name:
בַּשּׁוּק שֶׁל יְרוּשָׁלַיִם מָצָאתִי אֶת שְׁמִי בֵּין הַתַּפּוּחִים. מִישֶׁהוּ קָרָא: שִׁמְעוֹן! וְאַתָּה, אָמַרְתִּי, מִי אַתָּה? הוּא לֹא עָנָה. רַק הִצְבִּיעַ עַל הַשֶּׁקֶל שֶׁנָּפַל מִיָּדִי.
Two students disagree. Dafna says the poem is a coded elegy for Simon bar Kokhba: the name 'Shimon', the coin, and Jerusalem all point to the revolt. Eitan says it is about an ordinary man losing his identity in a market. The teacher asks the class to decide which reading the text supports, which it merely permits, and what evidence would settle the question. The class has 25 minutes and may not use outside sources.
1. Which reading does the text support more strongly, and what specific words or structural features decide it?
Read the worked answer
The text supports Eitan's reading more strongly, while permitting Dafna's as an allusion. Support for Eitan: the setting is a market with apples, not a battlefield; 'שמעון' is an unmarked, common name; the coin is a 'שקל', a modern currency, not a revolt coin; the speaker asks 'מי אתה?' and receives no answer, which is an identity crisis, not a national call. The verb 'נפל' ('fell') makes the coin accidental, not heroic. The poem's structure-direct speech, unanswered question, gesture instead of explanation-points to alienation. What Dafna can claim: the combination of Jerusalem, 'שמעון', and a coin can evoke Simon bar Kokhba, whose revolt coinage is famous. But the text never says 'bar Kokhba', 'revolt', 'Rome', or 'freedom'. A coded elegy would need a trigger such as 'נשיא' or 'חירות'. Dafna's reading is an intertextual overlay, not the plain sense. The best answer distinguishes what the words support from what they merely allow.
2. What would count as evidence to settle the disagreement, and why is that evidence unavailable in the 25-minute exercise?
Read the worked answer
Evidence that would settle the question includes the author's identity, the date and venue of publication, the title in context, or an external allusion marker. If the poet is a contemporary Jerusalem writer, the historical reading may be ironic; if the poem appeared in a national memorial anthology, Dafna's reading gains context. But the poem is printed anonymously, and the class may not use outside sources. Within the text, the evidence is lexical and structural, and it underdetermines the author's intention. The exercise is testing the difference between close reading and biographical speculation: a class can decide which reading is better supported without pretending to know the poet's mind. The 25-minute limit is not the only reason the question cannot be fully settled; the text itself withholds the needed information.
3. Rewrite the last three lines as a prose paraphrase in English, preserving the ambiguity of 'שקל'.
Read the worked answer
Prose paraphrase: 'He did not answer. He only pointed to the shekel-the coin, or the weight-that fell from my hand.' Keeping 'shekel' rather than 'coin' preserves the double resonance: in English, 'shekel' is both an ancient weight and a modern currency, just as the Hebrew word can evoke an everyday coin and an ancient measure. 'Fell' keeps the accidental, passive quality of 'נפל'; 'dropped' would also work but is more deliberate. 'Only pointed' preserves the gesture that replaces speech. The paraphrase should not resolve whether the gesture is accusation, recognition, or indifference, because the poem does not.