MFPHMI Part I

The exam is organised around four domains: epidemiology; biostatistics; health protection and communicable disease control; and health promotion, health improvement and health service delivery. Expect applied reasoning across all four rather than deep single-specialty recall. The domain list here is a study framework, so confirm the current official syllabus with the examining body before you build a revision plan.

We cannot state this. The official examination pages we attempted to consult returned 'Page not found' errors, so no question count, duration or pass mark was available. Treat any figure you see elsewhere with caution and verify directly with the Faculty of Public Health Medicine before booking.

It is a postgraduate membership paper, so it assumes working knowledge of epidemiology and statistics rather than undergraduate recall. The usual difficulty is not obscure facts but applying methods under time pressure: choosing the right study design, interpreting confidence intervals correctly, and reasoning through an outbreak step by step. Consistent practice on applied questions matters more than reading volume.

Start with epidemiology and biostatistics together, because measures of disease frequency, study design and interpretation of effect estimates underpin the health protection and health services domains. Once those are secure, move to communicable disease control and then to health promotion and service delivery. Studying statistics in isolation tends to produce weak retention.

We do not have this information. Retake policy, attempt limits and any associated fees were not available from the sources consulted, which returned error pages. Candidates should contact the examining body or check the current regulations directly, since these rules change and are not something an independent study site can confirm.

Common patterns are weak numerical fluency - miscomputing attributable risk, odds ratios or sample size inputs - and poor critical appraisal, where a result is accepted without checking bias, confounding or confidence intervals. A third pattern is shallow health protection knowledge, particularly around surveillance and outbreak investigation logic. Targeted practice on calculations and appraisal closes most of the gap.

No. This is an independent study platform and has no affiliation with, endorsement from, or connection to the Faculty of Public Health Medicine or the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland. It is intended only to support revision. All administrative matters - applications, fees, dates, results and appeals - must be handled through the official examining body.

No official recommended preparation time was available in the sources consulted. As general guidance, most candidates benefit from a structured plan of several months that includes weekly calculation practice and regular critical appraisal of published studies, rather than a short intensive block. Adjust to your own baseline in statistics and your clinical workload.