Shortage in a duty-suspended spirits movement
Vantage Spirits operates an excise warehouse. On 3 March it consigned 12,000 litres of vodka at 40% ABV to a bonded distributor in a neighbouring country under duty suspension, accompanied by an electronic administrative document and covered by a financial guarantee. The trailer seal was recorded intact at dispatch. At destination the receiving warehouse recorded 11,700 litres and noted that the seal number on the trailer did not match the dispatch record. The driver said he had stopped for six hours at an unapproved location. Excise duty on spirits is 32.00 per litre of pure alcohol. VAT is 20% and applies to the duty-inclusive value of the missing goods; their wholesale value is 9.00 per litre. The consignor's guarantee covers 100% of the duty. The distributor refuses to accept liability, and Vantage argues that the goods left its premises in full and the loss happened after dispatch.
1. Who is liable for the duty on the missing goods, and why does the seal discrepancy matter?
Read the worked answer
Liability sits with the consignor (Vantage) unless and until the movement is regularly discharged. Under duty-suspension rules the authorised consignor remains responsible for the duty until the goods are received at the authorised destination and the movement is properly discharged in the electronic system. The guarantee exists precisely to secure that responsibility; it is not a substitute for liability but a mechanism for collecting it.
The seal discrepancy defeats discharge. A valid discharge requires evidence that the goods reached destination intact. Here the destination seal number does not match the dispatch record, which breaks the chain of identification: the consignment that arrived cannot be shown to be the consignment that left. The unapproved six-hour stop compounds the problem, because it takes the movement outside the authorised itinerary.
Burden of proof. Once an irregularity is recorded, the consignor must show that the loss resulted from force majeure, from an event authorised by customs, or from an event after discharge for which it is not responsible. Asserting that the goods left in full is not enough; it is an assertion, not evidence. The consignor should be given the chance to supply weighbridge tickets, GPS traces, CCTV at dispatch, and the destination warehouse's receiving records.
Consequence. Absent satisfactory proof within the prescribed period, the duty becomes due in the country of dispatch and the guarantee may be called.
2. Calculate the excise duty and VAT chargeable on the shortage, and explain why the VAT base is constructed that way.
Read the worked answer
Shortage: 12,000 - 11,700 = 300 litres at 40% ABV.
Pure alcohol: 300 x 0.40 = 120 litres of pure alcohol.
Excise duty: 120 x 32.00 = 3,840.00
VAT base: the value of the missing goods plus the excise duty. 300 x 9.00 = 2,700.00; 2,700 + 3,840 = 6,540.00. VAT at 20% = 1,308.00.
Total chargeable: 5,148.00
Why the base includes the duty. Excise is part of the taxable amount for VAT on excise goods: the VAT is charged on the price the goods would fetch duty-paid, so duty that has become due must be inside the base. Charging VAT on the pre-duty value only would understate the tax and create an incentive for irregularity.
Why pure alcohol, not volume. Spirits duty is specific and expressed per litre of pure alcohol, so the ABV must be applied before multiplying by the rate. Using 300 litres directly at 32.00 would overstate the charge almost threefold and would be picked up as an error on review.
3. Set out the actions the officer should take, distinguishing debt collection from any fraud investigation.
Read the worked answer
Debt track:
- Record the irregularity formally and notify the consignor and the guarantee provider, with the calculation and the legal basis.
- Allow a reasonable period for the consignor to produce alternative proof of regular discharge; if none is produced, confirm the duty, excise and VAT, and call the guarantee.
- Issue the assessment and demand payment; charge interest from the date the duty became due.
- Send a mutual assistance request to the destination country to verify the receiving records, the seal, and whether the trailer was ever presented at the bonded warehouse.
Enforcement track (kept separate): 5. The evidence points to more than accident: a mismatched seal and an unapproved stop are classic markers of en-route diversion. Refer for investigation rather than closing the file on payment. 6. Do not treat payment as resolving the matter; paying the duty discharges the debt, not the question of whether a fiscal offence was committed. Conversely, do not withhold the debt assessment while the investigation runs, as limitation periods may expire. 7. Consider the driver as a witness first and a suspect later, depending on what the GPS and tachograph show. Interview under caution only once suspicion is formed and the caution is warranted. 8. If fraud is established, penalties and possible criminal referral follow, alongside recovery from the guarantee and any bond covering the transporter.