SOLAS Pipefitting study materials
SOLAS Pipefitting study resources

Fuel Oil Line: Thermal Movement and Support Failure

SOLAS Pipefitting · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Fuel Oil Line: Thermal Movement and Support Failure

On a 28,000 DWT chemical tanker, a 150 mm NB carbon steel fuel oil transfer line runs 32 m along the open main deck from a transfer pump to a settling tank. The line was re-routed during a recent yard period. It now has a 90° elbow 2 m from the tank nozzle and is hard-piped directly to the tank with a bolted flange. Supports are sliding shoes at approximately 6 m spacing; there are no line anchors, no guides and no expansion loop or bellows. The line operates between 15°C and 55°C, and the deck ambient ranges from -5°C to 45°C. After two months in service, the crew reports fuel weeping from the flange at the tank nozzle and a cracked support bracket. The pipe is not insulated. The chief engineer asks whether the line can be re-supported by adding more hangers and whether a flexible rubber coupling at the tank will solve the problem.

1. Estimate the unrestrained thermal movement of the 32 m line for the worst-case temperature range and explain how that movement could produce the observed leakage and cracked bracket.

Read the worked answer

Use ΔL = αLΔT. For carbon steel α ≈ 12 × 10^-6/K. Worst case between -5°C and 55°C is ΔT = 60 K; L = 32 m = 32,000 mm. ΔL ≈ 12e-6 × 60 × 32,000 = 23 mm. If installed at 20°C and heated to 55°C, ΔT = 35 K and ΔL ≈ 13.4 mm. The line is hard-piped to the tank nozzle with no anchor or loop, so this movement is restrained at the nozzle and at the first support. The resulting axial force and bending moment can open the flange joint (weeping) and fatigue or crack the support bracket. The 2 m elbow is too short to provide flexibility. Adding hangers alone will not relieve the thrust; it may simply move the problem.

2. Recommend a support, anchor and expansion-control arrangement. Include what not to do.

Read the worked answer

Design the line with an anchor and guides to direct expansion to a planned expansion loop or approved bellows. For example, place an anchor on the pump side, guides within a few diameters of the bellows/loop, and sliding supports at spacing per the approved class/support standard for 150 mm fuel oil, not the existing 6 m. At the tank nozzle, use a loop or an approved, fire-safe expansion joint with tie rods, and check the nozzle load against the tank allowable. Do not use a plain rubber coupling unless it is approved for fuel oil, fire-resistant and rated for the movement and pressure; a rubber coupling may also create a fire path. Do not simply add more hangers or clamp the pipe rigidly. Have a qualified piping stress engineer confirm the arrangement and obtain class approval before welding.

3. What inspection and testing should be performed after the modification, and what documentation should be updated?

Read the worked answer

After modification: inspect flange alignment and joint condition; NDT welds per class; hydrotest the line at 1.5 × design pressure, confirming the class rule, with calibrated gauges; check that anchors and guides are installed as designed and sliding shoes are free; verify bellows/loop alignment and cold pull; check nozzle loads and flange bolt torque. Update the isometric/as-built, support drawing, line list and class-approved documents. Functionally test the transfer pump and verify no leakage through temperature cycles.