IFoA CS2 study materials
IFoA CS2 study resources

IFoA CS2 study plan

IFoA CS2 · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)

  • Define the core CS2 modelling vocabulary: state variables, transition intensities, and cash-flow functions, and write one-sentence definitions in your own words

  • Derive the time-inhomogeneous Markov transition probability from the Kolmogorov forward equations for a two-state model without referring to notes

  • Set up and solve a three-state Markov jump process (healthy, sick, dead) numerically using a small time step, and verify the rows sum to one

  • Build a reusable spreadsheet or Python template that takes a transition-intensity matrix and returns probabilities over a time grid

Your checkpoint

A one-page formula sheet plus a working script that outputs transition probabilities for a three-state model, checked against a hand calculation for one time point

Week 2

Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)

  • Formulate the Thiele differential equation for a multi-state life insurance policy and state each boundary condition explicitly

  • Compute expected present values of benefits and premiums for a disability-income contract with at least three states

  • Distinguish the forward and backward approaches to solving policy values, and implement one of them end to end

  • Explain how the equivalence principle fixes the premium in a multi-state model and verify it numerically

Your checkpoint

A worked numerical solution to a three-state disability policy, including EPV of benefits, EPV of premiums, and the resulting net premium, with all assumptions stated

Week 3

Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)

  • Derive maximum likelihood estimators for transition intensities from continuously observed data and from snapshot (censored) data

  • Construct the expected information matrix for a simple two-state model and obtain standard errors for the intensity estimates

  • Simulate survival data from a known intensity and confirm your estimator recovers the true parameter within its standard error

  • Identify the bias introduced by discretising observation times and quantify it in a small simulation

Your checkpoint

A simulation study report (one to two pages) showing estimator bias and coverage of confidence intervals across at least three sample sizes

Week 4

Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)

  • Derive the distribution of the time to the first jump in a time-homogeneous Markov process and connect it to the exponential waiting time

  • Compute the probability of eventual absorption in each absorbing state for a given generator matrix

  • Apply the Chapman-Kolmogorov relation to check the consistency of a computed probability matrix

  • Solve a small system of linear equations to obtain expected sojourn times in transient states

Your checkpoint

A closed-book timed exercise (60 minutes) of six derivation and computation problems, self-marked against your formula sheet, scoring at least 80%

Week 5

Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)

  • Extend the multi-state framework to include a dependent risk factor and describe how transition intensities become proportional hazards

  • Fit a Cox proportional hazards model to simulated data and interpret the coefficients in actuarial terms

  • Compare a parametric intensity model with a semi-parametric hazard model on the same dataset and justify a choice

  • Explain how frailty or unobserved heterogeneity changes observed mortality and demonstrate the effect by simulation

Your checkpoint

A short comparison write-up with a table of fitted coefficients, standard errors, and a reasoned recommendation between the two model classes

Week 6

Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)

  • Build a profit-testing model for a multi-state contract that projects cash flows, reserves, and profit signatures year by year

  • Compute the internal rate of return and the net present value of the projected profit stream

  • Run one-way sensitivity analyses on the key assumptions and rank their impact on the profit signature

  • Reconcile a projected reserve roll-forward, explaining each component of the change

Your checkpoint

A projected cash-flow and reserve table for a ten-year horizon with a sensitivity ranking of at least four assumptions

Week 7

Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)

  • Assemble a single reference document linking each syllabus outcome in the modelling domain to the formula, method, and a worked example

  • Redo your weakest three topics from earlier weeks without notes and log the errors you make

  • Practise explaining a multi-state model derivation aloud in under five minutes, as you would in a written exam answer

  • Identify the two calculation types that cost you the most time and drill each until you beat a target time

Your checkpoint

A consolidated revision document covering every topic attempted, with an error log listing each mistake and the corrected method

Week 8

Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)

  • Complete two full-length mock papers under exam conditions within the allotted time

  • Mark each mock strictly against the official mark scheme and record marks lost by cause: method, arithmetic, or interpretation

  • Re-derive from memory the five results you most often got wrong across all eight weeks

  • Finalise a one-page exam-day checklist of formulas, common traps, and time allocations per question

Your checkpoint

Two marked mock papers with a scored breakdown by topic and a final one-page exam-day checklist

Milestones

Week 2: Can formulate and numerically solve a three-state policy value problem from a blank page in under 45 minutes, with no formula sheet

Week 4: Scores at least 80% on the closed-book timed exercise and can state the Chapman-Kolmogorov relation and its use without prompting

Week 6: Produces a complete profit signature with reserves and IRR, and correctly explains each reserve roll-forward component to a non-specialist

Week 8: Achieves at least 60% on both mock papers under timed conditions, with no repeated error from the week 7 error log