IFoA CS2 study plan
IFoA CS2 · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)
Define the core CS2 modelling vocabulary: state variables, transition intensities, and cash-flow functions, and write one-sentence definitions in your own words
Derive the time-inhomogeneous Markov transition probability from the Kolmogorov forward equations for a two-state model without referring to notes
Set up and solve a three-state Markov jump process (healthy, sick, dead) numerically using a small time step, and verify the rows sum to one
Build a reusable spreadsheet or Python template that takes a transition-intensity matrix and returns probabilities over a time grid
Your checkpoint
A one-page formula sheet plus a working script that outputs transition probabilities for a three-state model, checked against a hand calculation for one time point
Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)
Formulate the Thiele differential equation for a multi-state life insurance policy and state each boundary condition explicitly
Compute expected present values of benefits and premiums for a disability-income contract with at least three states
Distinguish the forward and backward approaches to solving policy values, and implement one of them end to end
Explain how the equivalence principle fixes the premium in a multi-state model and verify it numerically
Your checkpoint
A worked numerical solution to a three-state disability policy, including EPV of benefits, EPV of premiums, and the resulting net premium, with all assumptions stated
Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)
Derive maximum likelihood estimators for transition intensities from continuously observed data and from snapshot (censored) data
Construct the expected information matrix for a simple two-state model and obtain standard errors for the intensity estimates
Simulate survival data from a known intensity and confirm your estimator recovers the true parameter within its standard error
Identify the bias introduced by discretising observation times and quantify it in a small simulation
Your checkpoint
A simulation study report (one to two pages) showing estimator bias and coverage of confidence intervals across at least three sample sizes
Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)
Derive the distribution of the time to the first jump in a time-homogeneous Markov process and connect it to the exponential waiting time
Compute the probability of eventual absorption in each absorbing state for a given generator matrix
Apply the Chapman-Kolmogorov relation to check the consistency of a computed probability matrix
Solve a small system of linear equations to obtain expected sojourn times in transient states
Your checkpoint
A closed-book timed exercise (60 minutes) of six derivation and computation problems, self-marked against your formula sheet, scoring at least 80%
Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)
Extend the multi-state framework to include a dependent risk factor and describe how transition intensities become proportional hazards
Fit a Cox proportional hazards model to simulated data and interpret the coefficients in actuarial terms
Compare a parametric intensity model with a semi-parametric hazard model on the same dataset and justify a choice
Explain how frailty or unobserved heterogeneity changes observed mortality and demonstrate the effect by simulation
Your checkpoint
A short comparison write-up with a table of fitted coefficients, standard errors, and a reasoned recommendation between the two model classes
Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)
Build a profit-testing model for a multi-state contract that projects cash flows, reserves, and profit signatures year by year
Compute the internal rate of return and the net present value of the projected profit stream
Run one-way sensitivity analyses on the key assumptions and rank their impact on the profit signature
Reconcile a projected reserve roll-forward, explaining each component of the change
Your checkpoint
A projected cash-flow and reserve table for a ten-year horizon with a sensitivity ranking of at least four assumptions
Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)
Assemble a single reference document linking each syllabus outcome in the modelling domain to the formula, method, and a worked example
Redo your weakest three topics from earlier weeks without notes and log the errors you make
Practise explaining a multi-state model derivation aloud in under five minutes, as you would in a written exam answer
Identify the two calculation types that cost you the most time and drill each until you beat a target time
Your checkpoint
A consolidated revision document covering every topic attempted, with an error log listing each mistake and the corrected method
Actuarial Mathematics - core modelling and risk content (domain breakdown not enumerated in retrieved source)
Complete two full-length mock papers under exam conditions within the allotted time
Mark each mock strictly against the official mark scheme and record marks lost by cause: method, arithmetic, or interpretation
Re-derive from memory the five results you most often got wrong across all eight weeks
Finalise a one-page exam-day checklist of formulas, common traps, and time allocations per question
Your checkpoint
Two marked mock papers with a scored breakdown by topic and a final one-page exam-day checklist
Milestones
Week 2: Can formulate and numerically solve a three-state policy value problem from a blank page in under 45 minutes, with no formula sheet
Week 4: Scores at least 80% on the closed-book timed exercise and can state the Chapman-Kolmogorov relation and its use without prompting
Week 6: Produces a complete profit signature with reserves and IRR, and correctly explains each reserve roll-forward component to a non-specialist
Week 8: Achieves at least 60% on both mock papers under timed conditions, with no repeated error from the week 7 error log