IFoA SA1 study plan
IFoA SA1 · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Health and care systems, financing and regulation & Morbidity, mortality and other health-related decrements
Map the main ways health and care systems are financed (tax-funded, social insurance, voluntary private insurance, out-of-pocket) and explain the incentive each creates for insurers and providers
Build a one-page comparison of how regulation of health insurance differs from regulation of life insurance in at least two markets you know well
Derive the relationships between central death rates, force of mortality and survival probabilities under constant-force and uniform-distribution assumptions, and state when each is appropriate
Calculate crude and standardised mortality and morbidity rates from a small dataset and interpret the effect of age standardisation
Distinguish mortality, morbidity, recovery, disability-inception and lapse as competing decrements and sketch a multi-state model for a critical illness product
Your checkpoint
A two-page system-and-decrement reference sheet with worked numeric examples of crude versus standardised rates and one multi-state diagram
Morbidity, mortality and other health-related decrements & Life and health insurance products, design and pricing
Fit and compare mortality models (Gompertz, Makeham, Heligman-Pollard, Lee-Carter style) to a small dataset and justify the choice for pricing a specified product
Quantify the impact of mortality improvement, selection effects and anti-selection on a term assurance and a critical illness price
Explain the roles of underwriting, waiting periods, survival periods and exclusions in controlling morbidity risk, and price each into a product
Compare morbidity bases (incidence-based versus recovery-based) and show how the choice changes reserves and profit signature
Prepare a short note on how morbidity assumptions for a health insurance product should be set and monitored
Your checkpoint
A worked pricing illustration for one critical illness and one private medical insurance product, showing base assumptions, sensitivities and a justified recommendation
Life and health insurance products, design and pricing & Provider and payer arrangements, including alternative reimbursement models
Design the benefit structure of a private medical insurance product, specifying excesses, co-payment, limits, exclusions and provider network restrictions
Contrast indemnity, preferred-provider and managed-care arrangements and assess the effect of each on claims cost and member behaviour
Model how deductibles, co-insurance and annual limits change expected claim cost and the distribution of member out-of-pocket spend
Explain capitation, diagnosis-related groups, per-diem, fee-for-service and shared-savings reimbursement and derive the provider incentive each creates
Assess the insurer and provider risks created by a capitation or shared-savings contract and propose contract terms that align incentives
Your checkpoint
A one-page product-and-reimbursement design proposal with a quantified comparison of two reimbursement models on expected insurer cost and provider risk
Reserving, capital and solvency for health and care business & Morbidity, mortality and other health-related decrements
Calculate gross premium reserves and claim reserves for a health insurance portfolio using both a seriatim and an approximate method
Build an incurred-but-not-reported (IBNR) estimate using a development-factor approach and test its sensitivity to the assumed development pattern
Explain how reserving for long-term health and care business differs from reserving for short-term medical business, including the treatment of future premiums and renewals
Determine the capital requirement for morbidity, mortality and lapse risk under a principles-based regime and explain how each is aggregated
Evaluate the effect of reinsurance and of a change in the morbidity basis on the solvency position
Your checkpoint
A reserve-and-capital calculation pack for a sample portfolio showing best-estimate reserves, an IBNR estimate and a stress-test result
Reserving, capital and solvency for health and care business & Asset-liability management and investment for health and care insurers
Match assets to health and care liabilities by duration, currency and inflation linkage, and identify the mismatches that matter most
Explain why medical inflation and claim-cost inflation create a liability that is hard to hedge with fixed-interest assets
Assess the suitability of government bonds, index-linked bonds, corporate credit, equities and infrastructure for backing long-duration care liabilities
Quantify the effect of an interest-rate and a credit-spread shock on the insurer's surplus and on the solvency ratio
Explain the role of the ORSA and the own-risk assessment in linking asset strategy to the business plan
Your checkpoint
An asset-liability management memo with a duration-gap calculation and a table showing surplus under three interest-rate and credit scenarios
Risk management, reinsurance and capital allocation & Reserving, capital and solvency for health and care business
Identify and rank the principal risks of a health and care insurer using a risk register with likelihood, impact and mitigation for each
Compare quota-share, surplus, excess-of-loss and stop-loss reinsurance for a medical portfolio and quantify the cost and risk transfer of each
Design a reinsurance programme for a specified portfolio and justify the retentions and limits chosen
Allocate capital to business lines using at least two methods and reconcile the results
Explain how the risk-management framework feeds into pricing, reserving and capital decisions
Your checkpoint
A risk register plus a reinsurance programme recommendation with quantified capital relief and a capital-allocation table by line
Health and care systems, financing and regulation & Provider and payer arrangements, including alternative reimbursement models
Analyse a regulatory change (for example a price-cap, a risk-equalisation scheme or a mandatory-benefit rule) and quantify its effect on an insurer's pricing and profitability
Explain risk equalisation and community rating and show how they redistribute cost between insurers and between members
Evaluate the effect of provider consolidation and vertical integration on an insurer's bargaining position and claims cost
Assess the actuarial and commercial implications of moving from fee-for-service to bundled or outcome-based payment
Prepare a recommendation to a board on whether to enter or exit a specified health insurance market
Your checkpoint
A board-style decision paper with a quantified impact assessment of one regulatory and one reimbursement change
Professionalism, ethics and communication of actuarial advice & Life and health insurance products, design and pricing
Apply the actuarial profession's ethical and professional standards to a scenario involving conflicting duties to policyholders, the insurer and the regulator
Draft advice that distinguishes clearly between data, assumptions, judgement and recommendation, and state the limitations and uncertainties
Present technical results to a non-technical audience and defend the key assumptions under challenge
Review a piece of actuarial advice against professional standards and identify the deficiencies
Consolidate the eight weeks into a personal exam-preparation plan with a list of remaining weak areas
Your checkpoint
A written professional advice note with an executive summary, stated limitations and a self-assessed list of remaining weak areas
Milestones
Week 2: Can explain, without notes, how selection, improvement and anti-selection each move a term assurance or critical illness premium, and can compute a standardised rate from raw data
Week 4: Can produce best-estimate reserves, an IBNR estimate and a morbidity capital figure for a small portfolio within a two-hour closed-book exercise
Week 6: Can design a defensible reinsurance programme and allocate capital by line, justifying each retention and method chosen
Week 8: Can write a professional advice note that separates data, assumptions and judgement and survives a challenge to its key assumptions