IFoA SA4 study plan
IFoA SA4 · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Claims management, reserving and capital modelling & Financial reporting, valuation of liabilities and performance analysis
Build a one-page map of the reserving chain from claim notification through to booked reserves, naming the data fields each stage consumes
Reconstruct the chain-ladder algorithm from memory on a 5x5 development triangle and reconcile the result to a Bornhuetter-Ferguson estimate
Derive why the expected loss ratio in Bornhuetter-Ferguson stabilises immature origin periods and state the assumption that breaks
List the五项 components of an insurer's balance sheet under a market-consistent framework and explain how each is valued
Draft a 300-word note explaining IBNR to a non-actuary finance colleague without using the word 'triangle'
Your checkpoint
A worked reserving spreadsheet with chain-ladder and Bornhuetter-Ferguson side by side on one triangle, plus a 300-word plain-language note on IBNR
Claims management, reserving and capital modelling & Application of actuarial judgement to complex, unstructured general insurance problems
Diagnose three failure modes of deterministic reserving (regime change, latent claims, case-estimate drift) and propose a stochastic alternative for each
Compute a bootstrap or Mack standard error on the week-1 triangle and interpret the range in business terms
Explain how reserving uncertainty feeds the SCR via reserve risk and construct a simple one-year vs ultimate risk comparison
Identify which reserving judgements would be most sensitive to a change in inflation assumption and quantify the sensitivity
Write the assumptions-and-judgements section of a reserving report as if for an internal audit reader
Your checkpoint
A 600-word reserving uncertainty memo with a quantified sensitivity to claims inflation and a clear statement of the three largest judgement calls
Product design, pricing and underwriting for general insurance & General insurance market context, regulation and the operating environment
Decompose a gross premium into risk, expense, commission, profit and risk margin components and show how each responds to a 10% loss ratio deterioration
Compare technical pricing, market pricing and rate adequacy for a soft-market commercial line and state the underwriting action each implies
Summarise the prudential regime's key capital and reporting requirements for a general insurer in under 400 words
Explain how premium-rate monitoring, exposure growth and mix change distort a reported loss ratio
Identify three underwriting levers available when a portfolio is loss-making and rank them by speed of effect
Your checkpoint
A one-page rate adequacy dashboard for a hypothetical motor portfolio showing loss ratio, rate movement, mix shift and recommended underwriting action
Reinsurance, risk transfer and capital management & Enterprise risk management and governance for general insurers
Distinguish quota share, surplus, excess of loss and aggregate stop-loss by their effect on frequency, severity and tail volatility
Calculate the net cost of reinsurance for a worked example and explain why the cheapest cover is not always the best buy
Map reinsurance recoveries, counterparty default risk and reinstatement provisions onto the capital model
Identify the governance bodies and controls that should approve a reinsurance programme and the evidence they would expect
Explain how a reinsurance structure can create or destroy an incentive to underwrite carefully
Your checkpoint
A reinsurance programme proposal for a mid-sized insurer with cost-benefit analysis of two structures and a governance sign-off trail
Enterprise risk management and governance for general insurers & General insurance market context, regulation and the operating environment
Build a risk register for a general insurer covering at least eight risk categories with an owner, a metric and an escalation trigger for each
Explain the difference between risk appetite, risk tolerance and risk limits using a concrete example for each
Describe how the ORSA process links strategy, risk profile and capital and what a weak ORSA looks like to a supervisor
Evaluate three emerging risks (for example cyber accumulation, climate litigation, AI in claims) for their potential to invalidate current reserving or pricing assumptions
Draft the questions a non-executive director should ask about a capital model they cannot see inside
Your checkpoint
A risk register with at least eight risks, each with owner, metric, trigger and a one-line mitigation, plus a five-question board challenge list
Application of actuarial judgement to complex, unstructured general insurance problems & Communication of technical results to technical and non-technical audiences
Work through two unstructured case scenarios and produce a structured answer under time pressure, stating assumptions before calculating
Practise framing an actuarial problem by identifying the decision, the decision-maker and the information they actually need
Rewrite one technical paragraph three times for a regulator, a board and a policyholder audience
Present a numerical result verbally in under two minutes with a headline, the key caveat and the recommended action
Critique a weak written answer and identify what made it hard to follow
Your checkpoint
Two timed case-style written answers (45 minutes each) plus three audience-specific rewrites of the same technical paragraph
Professionalism, ethics and the Actuaries' Code in general insurance practice & Communication of technical results to technical and non-technical audiences
Apply the Actuaries' Code principles to three scenarios: pressure to soften reserves, a request to omit an unfavourable assumption, and a conflict over who the client is
State the correct escalation route and the point at which a matter becomes a whistleblowing or reporting obligation
Distinguish acting as an employee, a consultant and an expert witness in terms of duty and communication
Explain the role of peer review, model documentation and professional judgement disclosure in defending a technical position
Write a short note to a non-actuarial manager explaining why an actuarial judgement cannot simply be overridden by preference
Your checkpoint
Three one-page ethical scenario responses, each identifying the principle at stake, the action to take, the escalation route and the record to keep
Application of actuarial judgement to complex, unstructured general insurance problems & Communication of technical results to technical and non-technical audiences & Professionalism, ethics and the Actuaries' Code in general insurance practice
Sit a full timed mock under exam conditions and mark it against a self-built rubric covering structure, assumptions, communication and professionalism
Close the three weakest areas identified in the mock with targeted re-study and re-testing
Compress the entire syllabus into a two-page memory sheet of frameworks and checklists
Rehearse delivering a recommendation to a hypothetical board in five minutes with a one-page summary
Review the ethics scenarios from week 7 and confirm the answers still hold under time pressure
Your checkpoint
A completed timed mock with self-marked rubric scores, a two-page memory sheet and a prioritised list of remaining gaps
Milestones
Week 2: Can reproduce chain-ladder and Bornhuetter-Ferguson from a blank sheet, quantify reserving uncertainty and explain it in business terms without notes
Week 4: Can price a reinsurance structure, explain its capital effect and describe the governance route to approval, all in one sitting
Week 6: Can produce a structured answer to an unseen case in 45 minutes with explicit assumptions and an audience-appropriate summary
Week 8: Mock exam completed under time pressure with self-assessed rubric scores in every domain and a written gap-closure plan for any domain scoring below target