ILTS Learning Behavior Specialist I (290) study plan
ILTS Learning Behavior Specialist I (290) · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Understanding Students with Disabilities
Classify the IDEA disability categories by writing a one-line defining feature and a common instructional implication for each
Compare developmental, academic, behavioral, and communication characteristics across the highest-incidence categories (specific learning disability, speech/language impairment, other health impairment, autism, emotional disability, intellectual disability)
Trace how a disability characteristic translates into an observable classroom behavior and a matching support
Distinguish medical/neurological terminology (e.g., seizure types, ADHD presentation, hearing and vision levels) from educational terminology
Explain how family, cultural, linguistic, and socioeconomic factors shape the school experience of students with disabilities
Your checkpoint
A self-built 13-row disability-category matrix (feature, classroom impact, support) plus a 40-question Domain 1 practice set scored at 80% or better, with every missed item rewritten as a concept card
Understanding Students with Disabilities & Providing Instruction and Modifying Curriculum
Re-test the week 1 matrix from memory and correct any category still below mastery
Differentiate accommodations from modifications and generate three examples of each for a given grade-level reading and math task
Apply universal design for learning principles to describe multiple means of representation, engagement, and expression for one lesson
Select evidence-based instructional strategies (explicit instruction, modeling, guided practice, scaffolding, cooperative learning) and justify each match to a learner profile
Sequence the phases of direct/explicit instruction and identify where corrective feedback and cumulative review belong
Your checkpoint
One rewritten 30-minute lesson plan that shows the original task, the accommodated version, the modified version, and a labeled UDL element for each of the three principles
Providing Instruction and Modifying Curriculum
Design a scope-and-sequence decision for a student by matching task analysis, concrete-to-representational-to-abstract progression, and mastery criteria
Distinguish instructional intensity tiers and describe how group size, time, and frequency change across them
Adapt content-area material (science or social studies text) by reducing readability demands while preserving core concepts
Build a plan for teaching a self-regulation, study-skills, or social-communication skill using modeling, rehearsal, and generalization supports
Evaluate assistive technology options (low-tech through high-tech) against a specific access barrier
Your checkpoint
A modified curriculum unit packet containing one task analysis, one adapted text passage with comprehension items, and one assistive-technology justification paragraph
Assessing Students with Disabilities and Developing Individualized Programs
Sequence the special education referral and evaluation process from pre-referral intervention through eligibility determination
Distinguish norm-referenced, criterion-referenced, curriculum-based, and informal measures by purpose and by what each can and cannot tell a team
Interpret standard scores, percentile ranks, and age/grade equivalents and explain to a parent what each does and does not mean
Identify the required components of an IEP and write a present-levels statement that links to a measurable annual goal
Write one SMART annual goal with short-term objectives and a stated progress-monitoring method and schedule
Your checkpoint
A complete mock IEP shell with a present-levels statement, two measurable annual goals with benchmarks, a service-delivery summary, and a data-collection plan; plus a 50-question mixed Domain 1 and Domain 4 checkpoint scored at 80% or better
Assessing Students with Disabilities and Developing Individualized Programs & Planning and Managing the Learning Environment
Explain reliability and validity in plain language and identify which score interpretations are defensible
Map how assessment data drive placement, service minutes, and least restrictive environment decisions
Describe the functional behavior assessment to behavior intervention plan sequence and name the data sources at each step
Design a physical classroom arrangement and set of routines that support access, movement, and minimal distraction
Draft a tiered behavior-support plan with prevention, teaching, and response components
Your checkpoint
A one-page FBA-to-BIP case study: target behavior defined operationally, hypothesized function, two replacement behaviors, and three intervention strategies tied to the environment plan
Planning and Managing the Learning Environment
Establish a classroom management philosophy statement grounded in positive behavior support rather than consequence-only systems
Construct a daily schedule and transition routine set that minimizes downtime and predictable failure points
Differentiate paraeducator, co-teacher, and related-service roles within the learning environment
Plan for social-emotional and self-advocacy skill instruction embedded in the general routine
Analyze a described classroom scenario and identify three environmental changes that would reduce problem behavior
Your checkpoint
A complete learning-environment plan (arrangement sketch described in text, schedule, routines, reinforcement system, crisis-response steps) plus a 40-question Domain 2 and Domain 3 checkpoint scored at 80% or better
Collaborating with Others and Professional Responsibilities
Describe the roles and decision-making responsibilities of each IEP team member, including the student and family
Differentiate the co-teaching models and match each to a stated instructional purpose
Apply confidentiality and records-handling rules (FERPA, IDEA procedural safeguards) to three written scenarios
Outline the transition-planning process and the postsecondary outcome areas it must address
Identify the professional and ethical obligations around advocacy, mandated reporting, and avoiding conflicts of interest
Your checkpoint
A consultation script plus written responses to five ethics and collaboration scenarios, each citing the responsible party, the required action, and the communication channel
Understanding Students with Disabilities & Assessing Students with Disabilities and Developing Individualized Programs & Planning and Managing the Learning Environment & Providing Instruction and Modifying Curriculum & Collaborating with Others and Professional Responsibilities
Integrate all five domains by answering mixed-domain scenario items and justifying the best response
Re-drill every concept card and missed item accumulated since week 1 until each is answered correctly twice
Complete a timed full-length practice examination under test conditions
Rank remaining weak areas by error frequency and close the top three before test day
Finalize a test-day plan covering timing per item, flag-and-return strategy, and elimination approach for scenario questions
Your checkpoint
A timed full-length practice test scored at 80% or better overall with no domain below 75%, plus a one-page weak-area closure log showing the top three gaps resolved
Milestones
Week 3: Disability-category matrix recalled from memory at 90% accuracy without notes, and the modified curriculum unit packet reviewed against a self-scored rubric of at least 4 of 5 criteria met
Week 4: Mock IEP shell includes all required components and a measurable goal; mixed Domain 1 and Domain 4 checkpoint at 80% or better
Week 6: Learning-environment plan completed end to end; cumulative checkpoints show no domain below 75%
Week 8: Timed full-length practice test at 80% or better overall with every domain at or above 75%, and all accumulated missed items cleared twice