I85PREP
⌘ K
AIBE study materials
AIBE study resources

AIBE practice questions

One question at a time. Build your AIBE understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, electronic records offered as primary evidence must generally be accompanied by a certificate. Which provision governs the admissibility of such electronic records?

  1. Section 45A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
  2. Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 Correct answer.
  3. Section 27 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
  4. Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Explanation

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 replaced the Indian Evidence Act and addresses electronic records in Section 63, which carries forward the certificate-based admissibility regime formerly found in Section 65B. Section 63 requires a certificate signed by the person in charge of the device or management of the relevant affairs.

Question 2Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A person is prosecuted for an offence punishable with imprisonment of seven years. Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which right regarding legal counsel is guaranteed to an arrested person?

  1. A right to counsel only when the accused is a woman or a child
  2. A right to consult a legal practitioner of choice during interrogation, though not throughout custody Correct answer.
  3. A right to free legal aid only after charges are framed
  4. A right to counsel only if the offence is punishable with death

Explanation

The BNSS carries forward the constitutional and statutory guarantee under Article 22(1) that an arrested person may consult a legal practitioner of choice, and this right extends to consultation during interrogation. It is not confined to capital offences or particular classes of accused. The right arises from the moment of arrest, not from the stage of framing charges.

Question 3Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the offence of theft requires a dishonest intention to take movable property without the consent of the person in possession. Which essential element distinguishes theft from criminal misappropriation?

  1. The taking must be without the owner's consent and with a dishonest intention at the moment of taking Correct answer.
  2. The property must be immovable
  3. The offender must be a public servant
  4. The property must be worth more than a specified value

Explanation

Theft under the BNS involves dishonest taking of movable property out of another's possession without consent, with the dishonest intention existing at the time of taking. Criminal misappropriation deals with property already in the offender's possession or control. The distinction turns on the mode of acquisition, not on the value of the property or the status of the offender.

Question 4Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

In a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of immovable property, the plaintiff must show readiness and willingness to perform. Which provision of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 embodies this requirement?

  1. Section 20
  2. Section 10
  3. Section 16(c) Correct answer.
  4. Section 34

Explanation

Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 requires the plaintiff to aver and prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract from the date of the contract onwards. This is a mandatory pleading requirement, not merely a matter of evidence. Section 10 declares specific performance to be a general remedy, but the condition precedent lies in Section 16.

Question 5Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

Under the Limitation Act, 1963, a suit for possession of immovable property based on title is ordinarily governed by which Article and period?

  1. Article 64, twelve years
  2. Article 65, twelve years Correct answer.
  3. Article 58, three years
  4. Article 113, three years

Explanation

Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes a period of twelve years for a suit for possession of immovable property or any interest therein based on title. The period runs from the date when the possession of the defendant becomes adverse to the plaintiff. Article 64 covers suits for possession based on prior possession rather than title.

Question 6Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which of the following agreements is expressly declared void?

  1. An agreement in restraint of marriage of a major Correct answer.
  2. An agreement to sell goods at a price to be fixed by a valuer
  3. An agreement to indemnify against loss caused by fire
  4. An agreement to refer a dispute to arbitration

Explanation

Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 declares every agreement in restraint of the marriage of any person, other than a minor, to be void. The provision protects the freedom to marry and is not subject to a reasonableness test. Agreements to arbitrate, to indemnify, and to have a price fixed by valuation are ordinarily valid.

Question 7Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

In the law of torts, the rule in Rylands v Fletcher imposes strict liability for escape of a dangerous thing brought onto land. Which statement best captures the rule's essential basis?

  1. Liability arises on non-natural use of land where a dangerous thing escapes and causes damage Correct answer.
  2. Liability arises only where the thing is inherently poisonous
  3. Liability arises only on proof of negligence in storing the substance
  4. Liability arises only if the escape was foreseeable

Explanation

The rule imposes strict liability where a person brings onto land something likely to do mischief if it escapes, in the course of a non-natural use, and it escapes causing damage. Negligence need not be shown. Later decisions require foreseeability of the escape and damage, but the essence remains non-natural use and escape.

Question 8Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

Under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which of the following is a ground for a decree of nullity of a void marriage rather than a voidable marriage?

  1. The consent of the petitioner was obtained by fraud
  2. The marriage was solemnised when either party was already married and the earlier spouse was living Correct answer.
  3. The respondent was impotent at the time of the marriage
  4. The respondent was of unsound mind at the time of the marriage

Explanation

Section 5(i) makes a marriage void where either party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage, and Section 11 permits a decree of nullity on that ground. Impotence, unsoundness of mind, and fraud are grounds under Section 12 for annulling a voidable marriage. The distinction matters because a void marriage is invalid from the outset, whereas a voidable marriage remains valid until annulled.

Question 9Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A public limited company wishes to give a loan to its managing director. Under the Companies Act, 2013, which provision principally regulates loans to directors?

  1. Section 149
  2. Section 185 Correct answer.
  3. Section 188
  4. Section 180

Explanation

Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 restricts a company from advancing loans or giving guarantees or security to a director or to a person in whom the director is interested. It permits such loans only in limited circumstances, such as a managing director as part of the conditions of service, with prior approval. Section 188 deals with related-party transactions generally, but the specific prohibition on loans to directors lies in Section 185.

Question 10Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A witness is examined in court and the opposing party wishes to cross-examine her on her previous statement made to the police during investigation. Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which course is legally permissible?

  1. The previous statement may be used as substantive evidence of its contents
  2. The previous statement may be used only if the witness is a child
  3. The previous statement may be used to contradict the witness subject to the prescribed conditions Correct answer.
  4. The previous statement is absolutely privileged and cannot be used at all

Explanation

A statement made to the police during investigation is not substantive evidence, but it may be used to contradict the witness in the manner prescribed by the evidence law, subject to the statutory conditions. The contradictory portion must be put to the witness before it is proved. It cannot be relied upon as proof of its contents.

Question 11Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A plaintiff files a suit for declaration of title and injunction. The defendant raises the plea that the suit is barred by limitation. At which stage must the plea of limitation ordinarily be raised under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?

  1. Only at the stage of final arguments
  2. Only by way of a separate suit
  3. Only in an application filed after the suit is decreed
  4. In the written statement and, at the latest, before the framing of issues Correct answer.

Explanation

Order VIII Rule 2 requires the defendant to raise all grounds of defence, including limitation, in the written statement. A plea of limitation is a mixed question of law and fact and should ordinarily be raised before issues are framed; raising it at the appellate stage is generally not permitted unless the facts are admitted.

Question 12Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

During investigation of a cognizable offence, a police officer wishes to conduct a search of premises without a warrant. Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which condition must ordinarily be satisfied?

  1. The officer must obtain prior permission from the Magistrate in every case
  2. The officer must be of the rank of Superintendent of Police
  3. The search must be conducted in the presence of the accused's counsel
  4. The officer must have reason to believe that the thing required for the investigation will be found in the place, and the search must be recorded Correct answer.

Explanation

The BNSS permits a police officer to search a place without a warrant where there is reason to believe that something necessary for the investigation will be found there, subject to the statutory safeguards on recording the search. Prior magisterial permission is not required in every such case. The procedure emphasises contemporaneous documentation and presence of independent witnesses.

Question 13Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A contract is entered into by a minor who misrepresents her age. On attaining majority, she seeks to avoid the contract. Which statement is correct under Indian law?

  1. The contract is void ab initio and the minor cannot be held liable on it Correct answer.
  2. The contract is voidable at the minor's option and binds the other party if she affirms it
  3. The contract becomes enforceable against the minor on her attaining majority automatically
  4. The minor must compensate the other party for the benefit received as a condition of avoiding the contract

Explanation

An agreement by a minor is void ab initio under Indian contract law, and the minor cannot be held personally liable on it. The minor's misrepresentation of age does not convert the agreement into a valid contract. However, the minor may be required to restore specific property or benefits under equitable principles, but this is not a contractual liability.

Question 14Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

Under Article 14 of the Constitution, a classification is permissible if it satisfies the test of reasonable nexus. Which formulation correctly states the doctrine of reasonable classification?

  1. Classification must be based on the nature of the persons and must have a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved Correct answer.
  2. Classification is presumed invalid unless it is approved by the legislature within one year
  3. Classification must always be mathematically precise and exhaustive
  4. Classification is permissible only if it benefits every citizen equally

Explanation

Article 14 permits reasonable classification provided it is founded on an intelligible differentia distinguishing persons grouped together from those left out, and the differentia has a rational relation to the object of the statute. The classification need not be mathematically perfect. The doctrine applies alongside the newer test of manifest arbitrariness.

Question 15Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

In a criminal trial, the prosecution relies on a dying declaration recorded by a Magistrate. Which principle governs its evidentiary value?

  1. A dying declaration is admissible even without corroboration if it is found trustworthy and voluntary Correct answer.
  2. A dying declaration is inadmissible unless corroborated by independent evidence
  3. A dying declaration recorded by a police officer is always inadmissible
  4. A dying declaration is admissible only if the declarant survives to testify

Explanation

A dying declaration is admissible as an exception to the rule against hearsay and can form the sole basis of conviction if the court finds it trustworthy and voluntary. Corroboration is not a legal requirement, though courts scrutinise such statements with care. The statement is admissible only when it relates to the cause of death or the circumstances of the transaction resulting in death.

Question 16Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A company passes a resolution to buy back its own shares. Under the Companies Act, 2013, which condition must be satisfied for a buy-back?

  1. The buy-back may be funded entirely by a fresh issue of shares of the same class
  2. The buy-back must be authorised by the articles and by a resolution of the board or shareholders as prescribed Correct answer.
  3. The buy-back must exceed twenty-five per cent of the total paid-up capital in every case
  4. The buy-back requires the consent of every single shareholder

Explanation

Section 68 of the Companies Act, 2013 requires a buy-back to be authorised by the articles and by a board resolution or special resolution depending on the size of the buy-back. It also imposes funding restrictions, including that the buy-back must not be funded by a fresh issue of shares of the same class. The statutory limits on the quantum of buy-back apply, and unanimous shareholder consent is not required.

Question 17Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A testator executes a will bequeathing property to his two sons. Later he executes a second will revoking the first but does not destroy it. Which principle applies under the Indian Succession Act, 1925?

  1. The first will remains operative because it was not physically destroyed
  2. Both wills are void and the property devolves intestate
  3. The first will prevails if it was registered
  4. The later will revokes the earlier will to the extent of inconsistency, and the last valid will prevails Correct answer.

Explanation

Under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, a later will revokes an earlier one to the extent of inconsistency, and the last validly executed will governs the estate. Physical destruction is one mode of revocation but is not necessary where a later will exists. Registration of a will is optional and does not determine priority between competing wills.

Question 18Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

An arbitral tribunal passes an award. A party wishes to challenge it. Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which ground is available for setting aside an award?

  1. The award was passed after the expiry of six months from the reference
  2. The party was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the proceedings Correct answer.
  3. The award is contrary to the tribunal's own reasoning
  4. The tribunal made an error of law apparent on the face of the award

Explanation

Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 permits setting aside of an award where a party was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings, or was otherwise unable to present its case. Mere errors of law are not a ground for setting aside; the court does not sit in appeal over the merits. The Act does not prescribe a mandatory six-month period for passing an award.

Question 19Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A person accused of a non-bailable offence applies for bail. Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which consideration is central to the court's discretion?

  1. The court must grant bail only if the accused deposits the entire amount claimed as compensation
  2. The court must grant bail whenever the accused pleads not guilty
  3. The court considers the nature and gravity of the accusation, the antecedents of the accused, and the risk of flight or tampering Correct answer.
  4. The court must refuse bail if the offence is non-bailable in every case

Explanation

In deciding bail for a non-bailable offence, the court exercises judicial discretion guided by factors such as the nature and gravity of the accusation, the antecedents of the accused, the possibility of the accused fleeing justice, and the risk of tampering with evidence. Bail is neither automatic nor absolutely barred for non-bailable offences. The seriousness of the offence is relevant but not conclusive.

Question 20Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A tenant challenges an eviction order on the ground that the landlord did not give a valid notice under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Which requirement must a notice to quit satisfy?

  1. It must be served personally on the tenant by a court officer
  2. It must specify the exact amount of arrears due
  3. It must be in writing, signed by the landlord or his agent, and must clearly terminate the tenancy Correct answer.
  4. It must be registered with the sub-registrar

Explanation

Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 requires a notice to quit to be in writing, signed by the landlord or his agent, and to terminate the lease in the manner prescribed. It need not be registered, nor must it be served through a court officer. The notice must be clear and unambiguous as to termination.

Question 21Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A software company claims copyright in a database it has compiled. Which statement best reflects the position under the Copyright Act, 1957, as amended?

  1. Databases are excluded from copyright and can only be protected by patent
  2. Copyright subsists in a compilation only if it involves original skill and judgment in selection or arrangement Correct answer.
  3. Copyright in a database lasts for twenty years from creation
  4. A database is protected only if it is registered with the Copyright Office

Explanation

Indian copyright law protects compilations, including databases, where the author has expended original skill and judgment in selecting or arranging the contents. The protection is for the expression, not for the underlying facts. Registration is optional, and the term of protection follows the general copyright term.

Question 22Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A State legislature enacts a law imposing a tax on the entry of goods into local areas for consumption, use, or sale. Which constitutional provision governs such a levy after the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016?

  1. Article 286, which prohibits all State taxation of goods
  2. Article 304(b), which permits any tax on goods without restriction
  3. Article 246A, read with the GST framework, which replaced the earlier entry tax regime Correct answer.
  4. Article 301, which prohibits all restrictions on trade

Explanation

The Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 introduced Article 246A and the GST framework, subsuming various indirect taxes including entry tax. Article 301 guarantees freedom of trade, commerce, and intercourse, but it is subject to the regulatory and compensatory provisions of Part XIII. Article 304(b) permits reasonable restrictions with the President's assent, not an unrestricted taxing power.

Question 23Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

In a suit for damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff claims loss of profits that would have arisen from a collateral venture dependent on the contract. Which test governs remoteness of damage under the Indian Contract Act, 1872?

  1. Losses are recoverable only if the plaintiff had insured the contract
  2. Losses are recoverable if they arise naturally in the usual course of things or were in the contemplation of both parties at the time of contracting Correct answer.
  3. All losses flowing from the breach are recoverable regardless of knowledge
  4. Losses are recoverable only if the defendant acted fraudulently

Explanation

Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 limits compensation to losses arising naturally in the usual course of things from the breach, or losses which the parties knew, at the time of contracting, to be likely to result from the breach. This embodies the rule in Hadley v Baxendale. Remote or unforeseeable collateral losses are not recoverable.

Question 24Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A party seeks review of a judgment of a High Court under Article 226. Which statement correctly distinguishes review from appellate jurisdiction?

  1. Review is available only against legislative enactments
  2. Review is confined to errors apparent on the face of the record and does not involve a fresh appraisal of evidence, whereas an appeal may involve a broader examination of the decision Correct answer.
  3. Review and appeal are identical in scope under Article 226
  4. Review is a re-hearing on the merits, whereas appeal is confined to jurisdictional error

Explanation

The review jurisdiction under Article 226 is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and does not permit a fresh appreciation of evidence or a re-hearing on the merits. An appeal, by contrast, may involve a broader examination of the decision depending on its nature. The distinction preserves finality while correcting patent errors.

Question 25Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

An accused is charged with an offence, and the prosecution seeks to rely on a confession made to a police officer. Which statement accurately states the law under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?

  1. A confession to a police officer is inadmissible, but so much of the information as leads to the discovery of a fact may be proved Correct answer.
  2. A confession to a police officer is admissible if made in the presence of a Magistrate
  3. A confession to a police officer is admissible if recorded in writing and signed by the accused
  4. A confession to a police officer is admissible only in cases punishable with death

Explanation

The evidence law renders a confession made to a police officer inadmissible, but permits proof of so much of the information as distinctly relates to the discovery of a fact, provided the discovery is established. This is the statutory embodiment of the discovery rule. Recording the confession in writing or its being made before a Magistrate does not by itself cure the bar on confessions to police officers.

Question 26Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A client asks an advocate to draft a plaint seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property. Under the Specific Relief Act, 1963, which relief is the primary remedy the court grants for breach of a contract to transfer immovable property?

  1. Declaratory relief, because title passes only on registration of the sale deed
  2. Rescission, because the buyer's only statutory remedy is cancellation of the agreement
  3. Damages only, because equity never compels a party to perform a contract in personam
  4. Specific performance, because the breach of a contract to transfer immovable property cannot ordinarily be adequately relieved by compensation in money Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 provides that specific performance is the general rule for breach of a contract to transfer immovable property, since money compensation is ordinarily inadequate relief. The court enforces the obligation in personam against the seller rather than merely awarding damages. Rescission and declaration are distinct remedies with different statutory thresholds.

Question 27Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

An accused is produced before a Magistrate after arrest in a cognizable offence. Under the Constitution of India, within what period must the arrested person be produced before the nearest Magistrate, and what is the constitutional consequence of default?

  1. Within 24 hours of arrest excluding journey time, and detention beyond that without authority is illegal Correct answer.
  2. Within 48 hours of arrest including journey time, and detention beyond that is merely irregular but lawful
  3. Within 24 hours of the first remand hearing, and default only attracts departmental action
  4. Within 72 hours of arrest, and default is cured by a subsequent remand order

Explanation

Article 22(2) requires production before the nearest Magistrate within 24 hours of arrest, excluding the time necessary for the journey, and Article 22(1)-(2) rights are enforceable under Article 32 and Article 226. Detention beyond this period without magisterial authority is illegal and entitles the person to release. The 24-hour rule is a constitutional safeguard, not a mere procedural formality.

Question 28Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A plaintiff sues for recovery of possession of land and, in the same suit, asks for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering. The defendant contends the suit is barred by limitation. Under the Limitation Act, 1963, which period generally applies to a suit for possession of immovable property based on title?

  1. Twelve years from the date the plaintiff's right to sue accrues Correct answer.
  2. Thirty years from the date of the cause of action
  3. Three years from the date of dispossession
  4. Six years from the date of the sale deed

Explanation

Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes twelve years for a suit for possession of immovable property or any interest therein based on title, running from when the plaintiff's right to sue accrues. This long period reflects the policy of protecting settled titles while allowing a true owner a reasonable window. Shorter periods apply to other categories such as suits for money or movable property.

Question 29Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A person signs a negotiable instrument as a surety for the principal debtor without stating the capacity in which he signs. Under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, how is his liability determined?

  1. He is not liable at all, because a surety must expressly describe himself as such on the instrument
  2. He is liable only as a witness, because an ambiguous signature is treated as an attestation
  3. He is liable only after the principal debtor is adjudicated insolvent
  4. He is liable as a principal debtor, because absence of a stated capacity makes the signer primarily liable Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 29 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides that a person signing a promissory note or bill of exchange without specifying that he signs as agent or in a representative capacity is personally liable as a principal. The statutory presumption resolves ambiguity against the signer. Express words are therefore needed to limit liability to a representative capacity.

Question 30Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A Hindu male dies intestate leaving his widow, a son, a daughter, and his mother. Under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, how is his separate property distributed among the Class I heirs?

  1. The widow takes a fixed one-third and the children divide the remainder equally
  2. The son takes a double share and the widow, daughter, and mother share the residue
  3. The widow takes a life interest and the children take the corpus absolutely
  4. The widow, son, daughter, and mother each take one share, as all are Class I heirs Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 8 read with the Schedule to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 places the widow, son, daughter, and mother in Class I, and Section 9 provides that heirs in the same class take simultaneously and to the exclusion of later classes. Where several heirs of the same class exist, they take equal shares. The old mitakshara rules of unequal shares and widow's life estate do not govern separate property under the Act.

Question 31Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A partnership firm of three partners wishes to admit a fourth partner. Under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, which requirement must be satisfied for the admission of a new partner?

  1. Consent of a simple majority of the existing partners, regardless of the deed
  2. Consent of the new partner alone, since existing partners' rights are unaffected
  3. Approval of the Registrar of Firms, followed by a fresh registration certificate
  4. Consent of all existing partners, unless the partnership deed provides otherwise Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 31 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 requires the consent of all existing partners for the admission of a new partner, subject to any contract to the contrary in the partnership deed. Admission changes the mutual rights and obligations of the firm, so unanimity is the default rule. The Registrar's approval is not a condition for admission of a partner.

Question 32Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

An employer terminates a workman's services without notice or retrenchment compensation. The workman invokes the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Which condition must be satisfied for the retrenchment to be lawful under Section 25F?

  1. Two months' notice and a gratuity payment of thirty days' wages per year of service
  2. One month's notice or wages in lieu, plus retrenchment compensation of fifteen days' average pay per completed year of service Correct answer.
  3. Payment of compensation only where the workman has completed ten years of continuous service
  4. Prior permission of the appropriate Government in every case of retrenchment

Explanation

Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 conditions lawful retrenchment on one month's written notice or wages in lieu, retrenchment compensation of fifteen days' average pay for each completed year of continuous service or part exceeding six months, and notice to the appropriate Government. These are mandatory preconditions, and non-compliance renders the retrenchment invalid. Prior governmental permission is required only in special cases such as Section 25N.

Question 33Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A consumer buys a defective refrigerator and files a complaint before a District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which pecuniary limit governs the District Commission's jurisdiction?

  1. Claims up to one crore rupees, with no revision since 2019
  2. Claims up to twenty lakh rupees, as under the repealed 1986 Act
  3. Claims of any value, because pecuniary limits were abolished
  4. Claims up to fifty lakh rupees, as notified under the Act Correct answer.

Explanation

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 as originally enacted set the District Commission's pecuniary jurisdiction at up to one crore rupees, later revised by notification to fifty lakh rupees, with State and National Commissions handling higher-value claims. The 1986 Act's twenty lakh limit was replaced. Jurisdiction depends on the value of the goods or services and the compensation claimed.

Question 34Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

An accused is charged with murder, and the prosecution relies on circumstantial evidence. Which standard must the prosecution satisfy for a conviction, as settled by the Supreme Court of India?

  1. The circumstances must form a complete chain pointing unerringly to the accused's guilt, inconsistent with innocence Correct answer.
  2. The circumstances need only create a strong suspicion of guilt, shifting the burden to the accused
  3. The circumstances must be corroborated by a confession recorded under Section 164 of the BNSS
  4. The circumstances must be proved beyond reasonable doubt by direct eyewitness testimony alone

Explanation

In circumstantial evidence cases, the prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstances that is consistent only with the hypothesis of guilt and inconsistent with innocence. Suspicion, however strong, cannot substitute for proof beyond reasonable doubt. Direct eyewitness testimony is not required, and a confession is not a mandatory ingredient.

Question 35Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A company's articles of association contain a clause giving a director a right of first refusal over shares transferred by other members. A member transfers shares without offering them to the director. Under the Companies Act, 2013, what is the legal position of the articles?

  1. The articles are a public document only and create no enforceable rights among members inter se
  2. The restriction is void because pre-emption clauses are outside the scope of the articles
  3. The restriction binds only the director, since he is the beneficiary of the clause
  4. The articles bind the company and its members as a contract, so the restriction is enforceable against the transferring member Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 10 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that the memorandum and articles, when registered, bind the company and its members to the same extent as if they had been signed by each and contained covenants on the part of each member to observe their provisions. Pre-emption and transfer-restriction clauses in articles are therefore enforceable against members. The articles are more than a public record; they operate as a statutory contract among the company and its members.

Question 36Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A plaintiff obtains an ex parte injunction against a defendant, who later applies for its vacation. Under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which principle governs the court's power to grant temporary injunctions?

  1. The court must require the plaintiff to deposit the full suit claim as security in every case
  2. The court must be satisfied that a prima facie case, irreparable injury, and the balance of convenience favour the grant Correct answer.
  3. The court may grant an injunction only after the defendant files a written statement
  4. The court must decide the suit finally before granting any interim relief

Explanation

Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 empower the court to grant temporary injunctions where a prima facie case, irreparable injury, and the balance of convenience are established. These are settled equitable considerations, not a final adjudication of the suit. Security may be required in appropriate cases but is not a universal precondition.

Question 37Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A testator bequeaths his estate to 'my wife and my brother equally'. His wife predeceases him, and he does not alter the will. Under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, how is the bequest construed?

  1. The wife's share is held in trust for the testator's children
  2. The brother takes the whole estate, because the lapsed share devolves on the surviving legatee where the will shows no contrary intent Correct answer.
  3. The wife's share passes to her heirs as a class gift under the will
  4. The entire bequest fails and the estate passes intestate to the nearest agnates

Explanation

Under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, where a legatee dies before the testator, the legacy lapses, and where the will shows no contrary intention the surviving joint legatee may take the whole. The court construes the will to give effect to the testator's probable intention rather than to defeat the gift. The doctrine of lapse does not automatically convert the bequest into a class gift for the deceased legatee's heirs.

Question 38Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

An accused makes a statement to a police officer during investigation that reveals the location of a weapon used in the offence. The weapon is recovered. Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, how is the statement treated?

  1. The statement is wholly inadmissible, and the weapon cannot be proved
  2. The portion distinctly relating to the discovery is admissible, but the rest of the statement is not Correct answer.
  3. The entire statement is admissible as a voluntary disclosure
  4. The statement is admissible only if recorded before a Magistrate

Explanation

The rule, carried into the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, allows so much of a statement made to a police officer as distinctly relates to the discovery of a fact to be proved, while the remainder is excluded. This prevents investigative statements being used as substantive evidence while permitting reliable recovery evidence. The fact discovered must be shown to follow from the information.

Question 39Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A State Government issues a notification acquiring land for a public purpose. A landowner challenges the acquisition on the ground that no opportunity to object was given. Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, which safeguard is central to the objections process?

  1. A mandatory referendum in the affected village before any notification
  2. A hearing of objections by the Collector, followed by a reasoned report on the proposed acquisition Correct answer.
  3. Automatic judicial review by the High Court before the notification is published
  4. Approval of the acquisition by a two-thirds majority of the affected landowners

Explanation

The 2013 Act provides for a Social Impact Assessment, publication of the preliminary notification, and an opportunity for affected persons to object, with the Collector hearing objections and submitting a report. These participatory safeguards are central to the Act's consent and rehabilitation framework. A referendum or automatic pre-notification judicial review is not the statutory mechanism.

Question 40Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

Two parties agree to refer their dispute to arbitration seated in India. The arbitral tribunal is constituted, and one party challenges the appointment of the presiding arbitrator on the ground of bias. Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which course is correct?

  1. The challenge must be filed directly before the Supreme Court, which alone can remove an arbitrator
  2. The challenge automatically terminates the arbitration and requires a fresh reference
  3. The challenge is decided by the arbitral tribunal itself, subject to later judicial review under Section 34 Correct answer.
  4. The challenge can be raised only after the final award is passed

Explanation

Sections 12 and 13 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 require disclosure of circumstances affecting independence or impartiality and allow a party to challenge an arbitrator before the tribunal itself. The tribunal decides the challenge, and its decision is subject to challenge in the award proceedings under Section 34. This preserves arbitral autonomy while retaining judicial supervision.

Question 41Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A bank holds a mortgage over a borrower's factory. The borrower defaults, and the bank seeks to enforce the security without court intervention. Under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, which precondition must be satisfied before the bank issues a demand notice under Section 13(2)?

  1. The bank must obtain prior consent of the borrower's other secured creditors
  2. The account must be classified as a non-performing asset in accordance with the regulator's directions Correct answer.
  3. The bank must first file a suit for recovery before the Debt Recovery Tribunal
  4. The borrower must have been adjudicated insolvent by a competent court

Explanation

Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 permits enforcement of security interest without court intervention once the borrower defaults and the account is classified as a non-performing asset in accordance with Reserve Bank of India directions. The secured creditor then issues a demand notice giving sixty days to discharge the liability. Prior adjudication of insolvency or a recovery suit is not a precondition.

Question 42Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

An employee of a company is dismissed for misconduct after a domestic enquiry. He challenges the dismissal, alleging violation of natural justice because he was not given copies of the enquiry report. Under Indian labour jurisprudence, which principle applies?

  1. Any procedural defect automatically entitles the employee to reinstatement with full back wages
  2. The tribunal cannot examine procedural fairness once a domestic enquiry has been held
  3. Non-supply of the enquiry report may vitiate the enquiry, but the employer can cure it by proving the misconduct before the tribunal Correct answer.
  4. Natural justice is inapplicable to private-sector disciplinary proceedings

Explanation

Indian labour jurisprudence treats the enquiry report as part of fair procedure, and non-supply may vitiate the enquiry. However, the employer may seek permission to prove the misconduct afresh before the tribunal, and reinstatement is not automatic. The tribunal can examine procedural fairness even where a domestic enquiry was held.

Question 43Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A person is prosecuted for an offence punishable with imprisonment up to three years. The Magistrate proposes to try the case summarily. Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which limitation applies to summary trials?

  1. Summary trials are available only for offences punishable with fine alone
  2. A summary trial is generally confined to offences punishable with imprisonment up to three years, and the sentence imposed cannot exceed three months Correct answer.
  3. Summary trials require the consent of the accused in every case, without which they are void
  4. Summary trials may be held for any offence, and the Magistrate may impose any sentence

Explanation

The summary trial procedure under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is designed for relatively minor offences, generally those punishable with imprisonment up to three years, and caps the substantive sentence the Magistrate may impose in such a trial. The procedure expedites disposal while preserving appeal rights. It is not available for all offences, nor is it restricted to fine-only offences.

Question 44Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A manufacturer sells goods with a label that misrepresents the country of origin. A consumer files a complaint alleging unfair trade practice. Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which relief can the District Commission grant?

  1. Direct the manufacturer to transfer ownership of the business to the consumer
  2. Impose criminal imprisonment on the manufacturer without a separate prosecution
  3. Order the manufacturer to cease the practice, correct the label, and pay compensation for loss suffered Correct answer.
  4. Refer the matter to the Competition Commission of India for adjudication of the consumer claim

Explanation

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 empowers the District Commission to order discontinuance of unfair trade practices, corrective action, and compensation for loss or injury suffered by the consumer. Criminal penalties require prosecution under the Act's penal provisions and are not imposed by the Commission in the consumer complaint itself. The Commission cannot transfer ownership of a business.

Question 45Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A person claims title to land under an unregistered sale deed and also relies on long possession. Under the Registration Act, 1908, what is the effect of non-registration of a document compulsorily registrable?

  1. The document is void and cannot be used even to prove the payment of consideration
  2. The document does not affect the immovable property and is inadmissible to prove title, though it may be used for limited collateral purposes Correct answer.
  3. The document automatically transfers title after twelve years of possession
  4. The document is valid for all purposes but attracts only a penalty

Explanation

Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908 provides that a document required to be registered but not registered shall not affect the immovable property comprised therein and shall not be received as evidence of a transaction affecting that property, subject to limited exceptions such as collateral purposes. Non-registration thus defeats the title claim, though long possession may be argued on independent grounds. The document is not automatically validated by lapse of time.

Question 46Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A company wishes to alter its object clause to enter an entirely new line of business. Under the Companies Act, 2013, which procedural requirement applies to the alteration of the memorandum's object clause?

  1. An ordinary resolution of the board of directors alone
  2. A special resolution of the members, followed by filing the altered memorandum with the Registrar Correct answer.
  3. Consent of the company's auditors before the alteration
  4. Approval of the Securities and Exchange Board of India in every case

Explanation

Section 13 of the Companies Act, 2013 requires a special resolution for alteration of the memorandum, including the object clause, followed by filing the altered memorandum with the Registrar within the prescribed time. The Registrar may register the alteration and issue a certificate. Board approval or auditor consent is not the statutory substitute for the members' special resolution.

Question 47Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A plaintiff sues for damages for defamation published in a newspaper. The defendant pleads that the statement was true and published for public good. Under the law of torts, which defence is the defendant invoking?

  1. Absolute privilege, which applies to all newspaper publications
  2. Consent, because the plaintiff is a public figure
  3. Fair comment, which requires the statement to be a statement of fact rather than opinion
  4. Justification, coupled with the statutory or common law protection for publication for the public good Correct answer.

Explanation

Truth pleaded as justification is a complete defence to defamation, and publication for the public good may attract statutory protection. Fair comment, by contrast, applies to expressions of opinion on matters of public interest and requires the comment to be fair and based on true facts. Absolute privilege is confined to specific settings such as parliamentary and judicial proceedings, not newspapers generally.

Question 48Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A State enacts a law prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquor in certain areas and providing for compensation to affected licence holders. A licence holder challenges the law as violating Article 301 of the Constitution. Which analysis is correct?

  1. Article 301 is overridden automatically by any State police power legislation
  2. Restrictions on trade may be valid if they are reasonable and in the public interest, and the compensatory scheme supports their validity Correct answer.
  3. Any restriction on trade, commerce, or intercourse is void because Article 301 is absolute
  4. Article 301 applies only to inter-state trade and never to intra-state restrictions

Explanation

Article 301 declares trade, commerce, and intercourse throughout India to be free, but Article 302 permits Parliament and Article 304 permits States to impose reasonable restrictions in the public interest. The Supreme Court has upheld restrictions that are reasonable and non-discriminatory, and a compensatory scheme can support validity. Article 301 is not absolute, and it is not confined to inter-state trade alone.

Question 49Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

A company is wound up, and the liquidator must distribute assets. A secured creditor and an unsecured creditor both claim priority. Under the Companies Act, 2013 read with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which principle governs the waterfall in corporate insolvency resolution?

  1. Tax dues are paid last, after all other claims are settled
  2. Shareholders are paid before unsecured creditors because they are the residual owners
  3. All creditors rank equally, regardless of security, because insolvency dissolves all priorities
  4. Secured creditors' claims are met from the secured assets, and the statutory waterfall then ranks costs, workmen's dues, and other claims in the prescribed order Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prescribes a waterfall in which insolvency resolution costs come first, followed by workmen's dues and secured creditor claims within statutory limits, then other secured and unsecured debts, and finally shareholders. Secured creditors retain rights over secured assets, and tax dues are not relegated to the very end. The scheme deliberately subordinates equity to creditor claims.

Question 50Legal aptitude and bar examination syllabus subjects (detailed subject-wise breakdown not enumerated in the source)

An accused is tried for an offence and acquitted. The State seeks to appeal against the acquittal. Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which principle governs the appellate court's power in an appeal against acquittal?

  1. An appeal against acquittal is barred unless the State obtains prior leave of the Supreme Court
  2. The appellate court may reverse an acquittal only where the trial court's findings are perverse or manifestly erroneous, giving due weight to the presumption of innocence Correct answer.
  3. The appellate court must retry the case de novo and may convict on a fresh appreciation of evidence without deference
  4. The appellate court may reverse the acquittal only if the accused consents

Explanation

In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court has the power to review the evidence, but settled jurisprudence requires it to give due weight to the trial court's findings and the presumption of innocence, interfering only where the conclusions are perverse, manifestly erroneous, or based on a misreading of evidence. The appeal is a continuation of proceedings, not an automatic de novo trial. Prior leave of the Supreme Court is not the general rule.