Tone Marks and a Dead Elder's Recordings
A linguist has 14 months of fieldwork on Təmey, spoken by nine fluent adults, all over 70, plus about 40 passive understanders. The community school wants a transitional bilingual primer for grades 1-3. Təmey has three level tones, contrastive vowel length, 27 consonants including a prenasalized stop series, and a phonemic contrast the national language's orthography cannot represent without diacritics. Two elders disagree: one writes tone with accents, the other insists tone should be unmarked because 'children will learn it from hearing.' The linguist also recorded, with one elder's permission, a men's ritual register used at initiations. That elder has since died, and his sister now says the recordings must be destroyed. A university archive has offered to host the corpus with open access.
1. What orthography should the linguist recommend for the primer, and on what grounds?
Read the worked answer
Orthography is a social decision with linguistic constraints. The linguist's role is to lay out trade-offs, not to choose alone.
Principles:
- Phonemic, not phonetic: write the 27-consonant system at phoneme level; prenasalized stops can be digraphs (mb, nd) if those sequences are unambiguous.
- Tone must be marked. Three level tones carry lexical contrast; leaving them unmarked shifts the burden onto memory and slows decoding for beginning readers. Accents are the least disruptive option if the national orthography does not already use them for another function.
- Vowel length: double the vowel or use a macron consistently.
- Learner testing: pilot two versions with grade 1 and compare reading accuracy.
The elder opposing tone marks is voicing a language ideology - that children learn by ear - which may be true of oral transmission and still wrong for a primer. Form an orthography committee with the school, both elders, and a national-language teacher, and set a review date. Consistency matters more than elegance.
2. What should happen to the ritual register recordings after the consenting elder's death?
Read the worked answer
This is a consent problem that outlives the consent-giver. The recording was made with one elder's permission, but a ritual register is typically collectively held: an individual's consent does not extinguish the lineage's or the initiation society's interest, and the sister may be speaking for a group with authority over the register.
Course of action:
- Immediately suspend any plan for open access to those files.
- Do not destroy anything unilaterally either - destruction is irreversible and may override the dead elder's intent and the archive's deposit agreement.
- Convene the relevant elders and the family, ask what should happen, and record the decision.
- Options include restricted access with a named community custodian, a fixed embargo, return of copies to the community, or deletion.
- Segregate the register from the ordinary-language corpus in the archive's access tiers, and describe the restriction in metadata without describing the content.
The default in documentation is not open access; it is tiered, community-governed access.
3. Should the university archive host the corpus with open access? Design the deposit.
Read the worked answer
Open access is a default, not a right. With nine fluent speakers, the corpus is the principal record of the language, which argues for preservation - not for unrestricted distribution.
Design:
- Tiered access: open (wordlists, paradigms, public narratives), community-only (conversation, personal history), restricted (ritual, genealogies, anything naming individuals).
- A license naming the community, not only the linguist, with a community veto over uses beyond research and teaching.
- Fixed-term embargoes on personal and sensitive files, with named negotiators.
- Follow CARE alongside FAIR: collective benefit, authority to control, responsibility, ethics. Indigenous data sovereignty frameworks are the relevant standard even where the group is not formally recognized as Indigenous.
- Give the school a usable copy and train a local archivist.
The linguist's incentive to deposit openly should not determine what the community's grandchildren can see.