Two Labels for One Image in a Poetry Item
In a Class XII Arabic poetry lesson, the teacher sets a 4-mark appreciation question on these lines, printed on the worksheet: اللَّيْلُ سِرٌّ وَالنَّهَارُ بَيَانُ وَالصَّمْتُ حِكْمَةٌ وَالْقَوْلُ بُرْهَانُ مَنْ يَصْمُتْ يَسْلَمْ وَمَنْ يَقُلْ يَعْلَمْ وَالْعِلْمُ نُورٌ وَالْجَهْلُ ظَلْمَانُ The question asks for two literary devices and their effect. Student P identifies tibaq between al-layl and al-nahar and explains the contrast between concealment and clarity. Student Q identifies isti'arah in al-ilm nur and says knowledge is compared to light. Student R claims saja' in al-sirr and al-bayan because the line sounds balanced. The mark scheme lists tibaq and isti'arah but not saja'. A colleague wants to deduct from Q because the image could also be called tashbih baligh. The teacher must decide how to mark all three.
1. Award P and Q out of 4 (2 marks per device: 1 identification, 1 effect). Is Q's label precise enough?
Read the worked answer
P: 4/4. Tibaq is present: al-layl and al-nahar are opposites, and P does not stop at naming them; the explanation of concealment vs clarity shows the rhetorical effect.
Q: 4/4 if the explanation is as clear as reported. The image al-ilm nur is a likening of knowledge to light. Calling it isti'arah is acceptable because the comparison is implied; calling it tashbih baligh is also defensible because the particle and face of comparison are omitted. The mark scheme should reward the explanation, not punish a defensible label. If Q had written only 'isti'arah' with no effect, Q would get 1/2 for that device.
So P=4, Q=4, with a moderation note that tashbih baligh is an alternative label. The teacher should not deduct merely because the mark scheme names one label and the student names another.
2. R claims saja'. Should R receive any credit? Explain the distinction between saja' and qafiya in one short board note.
Read the worked answer
No credit for saja' as stated. Saja' is rhyme in prose, usually at the ends of prose phrases; the balanced endings here are qafiya (line-end rhyme), and the internal oppositions are tibaq or muqabala. R has noticed a real feature (balance) but mislabeled it. Give 0 for the device as written; if R can point to the paired opposites and explain the contrast, redirect the answer to tibaq and award accordingly. Board note: saja' = prose rhyme; qafiya = verse rhyme; tibaq = pairing of opposites.
3. A student asks why the same words can be called tibaq in one line and muqabala in another. How do you answer without overcomplicating?
Read the worked answer
Tibaq is the pairing of two opposites; muqabala is a broader balancing of two or more pairs in parallel. In line 1, al-layl/al-nahar is a single pair, so tibaq is the precise term. If a line sets several pairs against several pairs (night/day, silence/speech, ignorance/knowledge), muqabala is the fuller description. The labels overlap; in a 4-mark school answer, the student should name the narrower device and explain the effect.