The Missing Original ID and the High-Altitude Detour
Green Valley Tours, Guwahati, has confirmed a 6-night/7-day package for 8 travellers (ages 14–72) from Guwahati to Kaziranga (2 nights), Dirang, and Tawang (3 nights), returning via Bomdila. The package value is ₹1,42,000; departure is in 9 days. Two days before the final document check, the agent finds that (i) the 14-year-old's school ID is expired and the parents hold only a photocopy of the Aadhaar, (ii) two adult travellers from Bihar do not hold Inner Line Permits for Arunachal Pradesh, and (iii) the 72-year-old traveller has a doctor's note saying 'avoid high-altitude travel above 3,000 m for 4 weeks', but the family insists on continuing. The agency has already paid 60% of the hotel advance and the vehicle operator. A rival agent tells the family that 'ILP can be made at the checkpost'. The family is anxious and keeps calling the office.
1. Identify the documentation and eligibility problems in this booking. State what the agency must verify and advise before departure, and explain why each step matters.
Read the worked answer
The agency should separate three issues rather than treat them as one paperwork delay. First, identity: hotels and permit authorities normally require an original photo ID, and a minor needs a guardian's ID plus a birth certificate or school record. An expired school ID and an Aadhaar photocopy are weak; the family should obtain a fresh original document or a verified digital ID accepted by the hotel. Second, the Arunachal Inner Line Permit is a legal requirement for non-resident Indian travellers, not a favour at a checkpost. The agency must check the current eILP/online route and designated issuing offices, collect photographs and ID proofs, and build in processing time. Relying on hearsay creates a real risk of being turned back and losing prepaid costs. Third, the medical note is a duty-of-care issue: Tawang town is around 3,000 m and the Se La pass is much higher, so the doctor's advice directly conflicts with the itinerary. The agency should advise a fresh medical consultation, explain altitude risks in writing, and offer a lower-altitude alternative. Documenting each advice protects the traveller and the agency.
2. The family refuses any change and demands the original itinerary. How should the agency decide whether to proceed, and what conditions and communication should accompany that decision?
Read the worked answer
The agency should not make a silent exception or simply cancel. It should hold a recorded meeting or call, restate the doctor's note, and explain the specific risks: breathlessness, worsening heart strain, and long evacuation distances from Tawang. A signed risk acknowledgement is useful evidence but does not remove the agency's duty to avoid knowingly unsafe arrangements. The practical decision is to separate the low-altitude and high-altitude portions: run the Kaziranga and Dirang segments, and either omit Tawang or substitute a doctor-approved lower-altitude route. If the family still insists, the agency should decline the high-altitude segment in writing, refund or credit the unused Tawang costs according to supplier cancellation terms, and help with insurance claims. It should also confirm whether the 60% advance can be partly recovered or shifted to another date. Clear written communication, a single point of contact, and a realistic cost breakdown reduce the chance of a later dispute.
3. Prepare a short file checklist the agency should complete before departure to protect both the traveller and the business.
Read the worked answer
The file should contain: original ID and address proof for every traveller, plus guardian ID and age proof for the minor; a valid ILP for Arunachal with application receipt and permit numbers; the doctor's note and a fresh consultation record for the 72-year-old; a signed risk-disclosure form that lists altitudes and evacuation limitations; travel insurance details with the emergency helpline; a day-wise itinerary showing road distances and altitude; supplier confirmations and cancellation policies for hotels and vehicles; a payment ledger showing the 60% advance and any refund or credit; and a communication log of calls, WhatsApp messages, and written advice. The checklist should be reviewed by a second staff member. This is not bureaucracy: if the traveller falls ill or is stopped at a checkpost, the agency can show what it verified, what it advised, and what the family decided.