Amit, Sneha and one written report
It is the seventh period, after lunch, in a Class 8 room with 55 students. In the first 12 minutes of a 35-minute Social Science period you have already spoken to Amit three times: he called out an answer, made a joke when another student answered wrongly, and tapped his pen through the explanation. The class laughed twice. Last week you kept him back for five minutes; he missed the school bus and his father came to school angry. Amit's reading is about two years below class level. Sneha, who scored 88 per cent last term, has stopped submitting homework and sits with her head down; her mother says she is 'fine at home'. Your last seating change – Amit moved to the front – lasted two days before he began turning around to talk. The principal wants a written report on 'indiscipline in Class 8' by Friday.
1. Use an ABC (antecedent–behaviour–consequence) analysis to explain what maintains Amit's behaviour, and identify what your own responses are reinforcing.
Read the worked answer
Antecedents: after lunch, 55 students, a 35-minute period, a task that is probably reading-heavy for a student two years behind. That combination predicts off-task behaviour before Amit does anything.
Behaviour: calling out, joking at another student's error, pen tapping. Note that the joke is timed to a peer's mistake – it is a performance with an audience.
Consequences: peer laughter (strong, immediate, social) and teacher attention (also immediate). Keeping him back is delayed, weak by comparison, and it accidentally punished his family by making him miss the bus. Moving him to the front changed the setting but not the payoff, which is why it lasted two days.
Conclusion: the behaviour is most likely maintained by peer attention plus escape from a task he cannot access. My responses supply the attention and confirm the task as aversive. Correcting him publicly in front of 55 students raises the value of the audience.
Implication: the intervention must change the antecedent (task accessibility, a structured first five minutes) and the consequence (private, low-drama responses; attention for participation), not simply increase the severity of the punishment.
2. Write a three-week plan with two routines and one consequence ladder, plus how you will measure success.
Read the worked answer
Routine 1 – do-now on the board. A three-line starter is on the board before students enter, at Amit's readable level. The first five minutes have a defined task, so there is no vacuum for calling out.
Routine 2 – hands down, names from a jar. No calling out is answered, ever, by anyone. Names are drawn for responses. This removes the payoff of being fastest and gives wait time to weaker readers.
Consequence ladder (private, graduated):
- Non-verbal signal and proximity.
- Quiet sentence at the desk: 'You can answer when the name is drawn.'
- Two-minute conversation at the door after class – never a detention that costs him the bus.
- Phone call home, with one positive observation first.
- Referral to the principal only after the above.
Measurement: tally call-outs in a fixed 10-minute window, three times a week. Establish a baseline this week (roughly eight per period from observation). Target fewer than three by week three. Put the numbers in the Friday report instead of adjectives like 'indisciplined'.
3. Sneha appears in the same report. State your hypothesis and what you will do in the next ten days.
Read the worked answer
Do not merge her with the discipline category. Her change is a sudden drop in a previously high-achieving student, which is a signal to screen, not to sanction. Writing her into an 'indiscipline' report would follow her for the year.
Hypotheses to test, cheapest first: an emerging learning gap in one subject; bullying or social exclusion; illness, anaemia or poor sleep; a change at home she will not report; and a mental-health concern such as depression, which in adolescents often looks like withdrawal rather than sadness.
Ten-day plan:
- A five-minute private conversation, opening with a specific observation, not a label: 'You scored 88 last term and have not submitted three assignments; what has changed?'
- Review her last three weeks of written work for a subject-specific pattern.
- Check vision and hearing through the school health screening.
- Ask one trusted classmate, discreetly and without turning it into an investigation.
- Contact the mother with specific facts, not the word 'attitude'.
- Refer to the block-level counsellor under Samagra Shiksha if the conversation yields no explanation.
Report to the principal as 'monitoring and support', separate from Amit's behaviour plan.