₹18,000 a Month and Four Competing Claims
Ramesh's family of five in a small town has a take-home income of ₹18,000 a month and no savings. Last year they borrowed ₹20,000 from a local moneylender at 5% per month to pay for a wedding. The outstanding amount is still ₹20,000 because they pay only the interest each month. A shopkeeper offers a mixer-grinder at ₹5,500 cash or ₹6,600 in six monthly instalments of ₹1,100, described as "no extra charge". The elder daughter's school fee of ₹9,000 is due in three weeks. The mother wants to buy the mixer on instalments now and to take a fresh ₹15,000 loan to clear the first one. A chit-fund agent is offering a ₹50,000 "prize" if the family joins a ₹2,000-a-month scheme for 25 months.
1. Calculate the real annual cost of the moneylender loan and of the instalment offer, and state what the comparison means for the family.
Read the worked answer
Moneylender
- Interest = 5% of ₹20,000 = ₹1,000 a month = ₹12,000 a year, which is 60% simple interest.
- Because only interest is paid, the principal never falls. If this continues for three years the family pays ₹36,000 and still owes ₹20,000 - they are renting the debt, not repaying it.
Instalment offer
- Extra paid = ₹6,600 − ₹5,500 = ₹1,100, described as 'no extra charge'. That is 20% of the price for six months.
- The arithmetic of instalments: the family does not hold ₹5,500 for six months; the balance falls to zero, so the average amount in use is about ₹2,750. Earning ₹1,100 on about ₹2,750 in half a year is a rate of roughly 40% for six months - an effective annual rate in the region of 70–80%, i.e. higher than the moneylender.
What this means
- The phrase 'no extra charge' is descriptively false: ₹1,100 is a charge.
- The cheapest money is the money not borrowed. Delaying the mixer by three months and buying it for cash saves the whole ₹1,100.
- Taking a new loan to clear an old one - borrowing ₹15,000 at an unknown rate to pay off ₹20,000 at 60% - adds a second creditor and usually a second set of interest, without reducing total outflow. It is only rational if the new rate is genuinely and provably lower and the repayment date is fixed in writing.
2. Rank the four claims on the family's money (old debt, mixer, school fee, chit fund) using a needs-versus-wants and priority framework, and justify the order of action.
Read the worked answer
Framework: rank by (a) consequence of not meeting the claim, (b) urgency of the date, (c) cost of meeting it the wrong way. A need unmet has a serious consequence; a want can be postponed without harm.
- School fee, ₹9,000 in three weeks - first. Consequence of default is direct harm to the child's education (possible removal from school), and the cost of delay is immediate. This is a need with a deadline. Plan: set aside ₹3,000 a month from this month, speak to the school about a dated instalment plan rather than borrowing.
- Old debt of ₹20,000 - second, and restructured. The cost per month is already ₹1,000, which is 5.6% of total income. Action: negotiate a written schedule in which each payment reduces principal, or convert to a bank/micro-finance loan at a stated lower rate with a fixed end date. Do not simply keep paying interest.
- Mixer-grinder - third, postponed. A mixer is a want that saves labour, not an emergency; a borrowed or shared one or manual grinding can bridge three months. If bought, buy cash after the fee is paid. The instalment route is the most expensive way to own it.
- Chit fund - last: do not join. Reason: it demands ₹2,000 a month (11% of income) for 25 months, the 'prize' is not a prize but an early draw that must still be repaid through later subscriptions, and unregistered schemes carry default risk with no easy remedy. Money committed here is money unavailable for the fee.
Overall judgement: the family's problem is not a shortage of credit offers but the absence of a written monthly plan. Any plan must first protect the fee and reduce the debt principal.
3. What consumer rights, standards and documents are relevant here, and where can the family seek redressal?
Read the worked answer
Rights under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019
- The right to be informed - the true price and the finance charge must be disclosed; calling ₹6,600 'no extra charge' when cash price is ₹5,500 is a misleading representation and an unfair trade practice.
- The right to choose, to safety, to be heard, to seek redressal, and to consumer education.
- The right to protection against unfair contracts - an instalment agreement must be in writing with the rate, the number of instalments and the consequences of default.
Documents to keep
- Cash memo or GST bill for the mixer, the warranty card, and the written instalment terms; for the moneylender, a signed receipt for every payment and the rate in writing; for the chit fund, the registration details of the scheme.
Standards to look for
- ISI (BIS) mark on electrical appliances - a mandatory certification for many; check the voltage and wattage on the label.
- FSSAI mark on food; Agmark on agricultural produce; Hallmark on gold; Ecomark for environment-friendly goods. For a mixer, also check the stated maximum retail price and that the shop charges no more.
Where to go
- First a written complaint to the seller, keeping a copy.
- Then the Consumer Commission: District Commission for claims up to ₹50 lakh, State Commission for ₹50 lakh to ₹2 crore, National Commission above ₹2 crore, filed within two years of the cause of action; e-Daakhil allows online filing. A free District Consumer Helpline (1915) can register the grievance first.