Bihar Intermediate Philosophy (BSEB) flashcards
Bihar Intermediate Philosophy (BSEB) · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Anekantavada
- Jaina doctrine that reality possesses infinite aspects, so every object is both permanent as substance and changing in modes; it grounds non-absolutist description of reality.
- Syadvada
- Jaina sevenfold predication qualified by 'syat' (in some respect), ranging from 'is' and 'is not' to 'inexpressible', preventing unqualified assertions about many-sided reality.
- Jaina karma as pudgala
- In Jainism karma is a subtle physical substance that binds the jiva through passions; eight karma types obscure knowledge, perception and conduct until shed by austerity.
- Four Noble Truths
- Buddha's framework: suffering (duhkha), its arising in craving (samudaya), its cessation (nirodha), and the eightfold path leading to cessation (marga).
- Pratityasamutpada
- Dependent origination: all phenomena arise in dependence on conditions, described through twelve links from ignorance to old age and death, avoiding eternalism and annihilationism.
- Anatta
- Buddhist no-self doctrine: the five aggregates constituting a person are impermanent and suffering, hence none is 'mine, I, or my self'; the self is a conventional designation.
- Nirvana
- In Buddhism, the extinguishing of craving, aversion and ignorance; the unconditioned end of suffering, not annihilation of a self, realised in life and completed at death.
- Charvaka epistemology
- Lokayata accepts perception alone as a pramana and rejects inference, since invariable concomitance (vyapti) cannot be observed; this grounds its materialist metaphysics.
- Charvaka consciousness
- Charvaka holds consciousness emerges from the four material elements, as intoxication arises from fermented ingredients; there is no soul separate from the living body.
- Charvaka hedonism
- Lokayata ethics urges pursuit of pleasure and avoidance of pain while life lasts, rejecting karma, rebirth and scriptural duty as unverifiable; death is final release.
- Nyaya pramanas
- Nyaya recognises four sources of valid knowledge: perception, inference, comparison (upamana) and verbal testimony (sabda); Mimamsa adds presumption and non-apprehension.
- Five-membered inference
- Nyaya syllogism: pratijna (thesis), hetu (reason), udaharana (example), upanaya (application) and nigamana (conclusion), with vyapti as the invariable ground.
- Vaisheshika padarthas
- Six categories of reality: substance, quality, action, universality, particularity and inherence; absence (abhava) was later added as a seventh category.
- Hetvabhasa
- Nyaya fallacy of inference: a reason that appears valid but fails vyapti, such as the deviant, contradictory, counter-balanced or unproved reason.
- Prakriti and Purusha
- Samkhya's two ultimates: prakriti is one active primordial matter of three gunas; purusha is plural, passive pure consciousness whose proximity triggers evolution.
- Three gunas
- Samkhya constituents of prakriti: sattva (clarity), rajas (activity) and tamas (inertia); their equilibrium is unmanifest prakriti and their disturbance begins evolution.
- Eight limbs of Yoga
- Patanjali's ashtanga: yama, niyama, asana, pranayama, pratyahara, dharana, dhyana and samadhi, progressing from ethical restraint to meditative absorption.
- Kaivalya
- Samkhya-Yoga liberation: purusha's isolation from prakriti through discriminative knowledge (viveka-khyati), ending the misidentification of consciousness with matter.
- Advaita Brahman
- Sankara's non-dualism: Brahman alone is real, the world is maya or avidya, and the individual self is Brahman; liberation is knowledge of this identity.
- Vishishtadvaita
- Ramanuja's qualified non-dualism: one Brahman qualified by conscious souls and matter as its body; differences are real within unity, and liberation is eternal service.
- Dvaita five differences
- Madhva's dualism asserts five real differences: God and souls, God and matter, souls and souls, souls and matter, and matter and matter; liberation comes by grace.
- Mimamsa svatah pramanya
- Mimamsa thesis that knowledge is intrinsically valid; validity is assumed unless defeated, while invalidity is established by external defeating conditions.
- Cogito ergo sum
- Descartes' foundational certainty: even radical doubt presupposes an existing doubter, so 'I think, therefore I exist' is indubitable and grounds rationalist epistemology.
- Hume on causation
- Hume argues we never perceive a necessary connection between events; causal belief arises from custom and habit after repeated observed conjunctions of similar pairs.
- Locke primary qualities
- Locke distinguishes primary qualities (extension, figure, motion) inherent in bodies from secondary qualities (colour, taste, sound) which are powers to produce ideas in perceivers.
- Kant synthetic a priori
- Kant's class of judgments that are informative yet independent of experience, such as arithmetic and causality, made possible by the mind's a priori forms and categories.
- Kant categorical imperative
- Kant's deontological principle: act only on maxims you could will as universal law, and treat humanity always as an end, never merely as a means.
- Nishkama karma
- Bhagavadgita's ethic of disinterested action: perform one's own duty (svadharma) without attachment to results, treating success and failure with equanimity.
- Utilitarianism
- Consequentialist theory judging actions by their tendency to maximise overall happiness; Bentham quantifies pleasure, Mill distinguishes quality as well as quantity.
- Aristotelian eudaimonia
- Aristotle's highest good: flourishing through habituated virtues chosen according to the mean between excess and deficiency, guided by practical wisdom.
- Validity versus soundness
- Validity concerns form: no possible case has true premises and a false conclusion. Soundness adds that the premises are actually true, guaranteeing a true conclusion.
- Affirming the consequent
- Formal fallacy: from 'if P then Q' and 'Q' concluding 'P'; the consequent's truth does not establish the antecedent, since other conditions may produce Q.