The Founder-Dependent Agency After a Client Shock
Karthik founded a 12-person web-development agency in Hyderabad seven years ago. Revenue is ₹1.8 crore, net margin is 18%, and he draws a salary of ₹18 lakh. One US client provides 60% of revenue; three others provide 25%; the rest is small projects. That client has told him it will move work in-house within nine months. Karthik works 70 hours a week, mostly on delivery and client firefighting. He sees three growth options. First, hire six developers and chase two more enterprise clients like the current one; this needs ₹45 lakh, which a bank will lend at 11% over five years. Second, productise an appointment-scheduling tool for clinics that his team built for one client, and sell subscriptions at ₹2,500 a month. Third, franchise the agency brand to three tier-2 cities for ₹8 lakh each. His savings are ₹20 lakh, and he has no partner.
1. Diagnose Karthik's real problem and evaluate the three options using the Ansoff matrix, resource fit, risk, and speed to revenue.
Read the worked answer
Diagnosis: Karthik does not have a growth problem first; he has a concentration and founder-dependency problem. 60% of revenue disappears in nine months, and he is the bottleneck at 70 hours a week.
| Option | Ansoff position | Resource fit | Risk | Speed to revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hire 6 developers, chase enterprise clients | Market penetration / expansion | Weak: requires sales capability he lacks | High: ₹45 lakh debt, fixed salaries, 6–9 month sales cycle | Slow, 9–12 months |
| Productise clinic scheduling | Diversification (new product, new market) | Strong: code and domain knowledge already exist | Moderate: needs product and support capability | Medium, 6–12 months |
| Franchise to 3 cities | Market development | Weak: brand is founder-dependent | High: quality and brand dilution | Fast cash, slow recurring value |
Option 1 repeats the dependency and adds about ₹11.7 lakh a year of EMI plus ₹48 lakh of salaries. Option 3 raises ₹24 lakh one-time but is hard to control. Option 2 is the only option that builds a recurring, scalable asset, but it must be validated with paying clinics before hiring.
2. Recommend a 12-month plan with financial guardrails. Should he take the ₹45 lakh bank loan? Justify.
Read the worked answer
12-month plan and guardrails
- Months 0–3: protect the existing 40% of revenue; assign two developers to the clinic product; sign 10 paying pilot clinics at ₹2,500 a month (₹25,000 MRR); Karthik cuts delivery involvement to 40%.
- Months 4–6: reach 50 clinics (₹1.25 lakh MRR); hire one salesperson, not six developers; keep gross margin above 70%; reduce the US client to below 50% of revenue.
- Months 7–9: 100 clinics (₹2.5 lakh MRR); enterprise concentration below 45%; maintain three months of cash expenses.
- Months 10–12: 150 clinics (₹3.75 lakh MRR); decide on scale hiring only if customer acquisition cost payback is under nine months and monthly churn is below 3%.
Should he take the ₹45 lakh loan? No, not now. The EMI is about ₹97,800 a month, or ₹11.7 lakh a year, and the hiring plan adds ₹48 lakh of annual salaries before the new clients pay. That is a fixed-cost bet on a 6–9 month sales cycle while his anchor revenue is leaving. Fund the product pilot from ₹8–10 lakh of savings and current cash flow. Take debt only after recurring revenue covers at least 1.5 times the EMI.
3. What funding mix would you recommend, and what milestones must be met before committing to it?
Read the worked answer
Funding mix: use ₹8–10 lakh of savings and internal accruals for the pilot. Do not give equity yet: the agency has no proven recurring revenue, so any equity would be cheap for the investor and expensive for Karthik. Do not franchise merely to raise ₹24 lakh; the management load and brand risk are high.
Milestones before external funding: 50 paying clinics, monthly churn below 3%, gross margin above 70%, CAC payback under nine months, and enterprise concentration below 45%. If those are met, a ₹40–50 lakh loan or a small equity round can be justified at a much better valuation. If they are not met, the pilot should be stopped and the agency should focus on replacing the departing client with two mid-size accounts.