Drunk Driving, an Expired Licence and the Third-Party Award
Rohit's car, insured under a comprehensive motor policy with an IDV of ₹8 lakh, meets with an accident at 11 p.m. on 14 August. His blood alcohol level is 0.09%, above the legal limit. His driving licence expired on 31 May and was not renewed. The car's repair estimate is ₹3.20 lakh. A pedestrian, Sunita, suffers a fractured leg and claims ₹15 lakh as compensation. The insurer's surveyor says the car was being driven rashly. The policy has a 'no claim bonus' of 20% and a compulsory deductible of ₹1,000. Rohit argues that the third-party claim must be paid by the insurer and that his own damage claim cannot be denied because the accident was not intentional. The policy is in force and the premium is paid. Sunita has filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, and the insurer is a party.
1. Must the insurer pay Sunita's third-party claim? Can it recover from Rohit?
Read the worked answer
Third-party liability is compulsory. Under the Motor Vehicles Act, a comprehensive policy must cover third-party injury. The insurer is bound to satisfy the award even where the insured has breached a policy condition, such as driving with an expired licence or under the influence of alcohol. Sunita is a third party; she should not be left without compensation.
Recovery. After paying the award, the insurer can recover the amount from Rohit. The expired licence is a clear statutory ground for recovery. Drunk driving is also a breach of the policy condition; the insurer can rely on it in the contract, though the statutory recovery route is strongest for the licence breach. The insurer should pay the award and then pursue recovery, rather than refusing to pay Sunita. The Tribunal will decide the compensation; the insurer can defend on quantum but not on the compulsory third-party cover.
Practical step. The insurer must deposit the award amount with the Tribunal and then issue a notice to Rohit for recovery. The right of recovery is not automatic; the insurer must plead and prove the breach.
2. Can the insurer repudiate Rohit's own damage claim? Discuss the effect of the expired licence, alcohol and rash driving.
Read the worked answer
Own damage is contractual. The own damage section is a contract of indemnity and is subject to policy conditions. Two conditions are clearly broken: the driving licence had expired on 31 May and was not renewed; and the blood alcohol level was above the legal limit. Driving without a valid licence and drunk driving are fundamental breaches. The insurer can repudiate the own damage claim.
Rash driving. Rashness is negligence. It is not, by itself, a ground to deny the claim unless the policy excludes it or the insured wilfully caused the loss. But the licence and alcohol breaches are enough. The fact that the accident was not intentional does not cure them. The insurer should rely on the surveyor's report and the police record. If the insurer pays despite the breach, it does so ex gratia; it is not legally liable. The claim should be repudiated with reasons and the insured informed of the grievance remedy.
3. Calculate the maximum own damage liability if the insurer were to admit the claim, and explain the effect of the no-claim bonus and deductible.
Read the worked answer
Hypothetical calculation. If the own damage claim were admitted, the payable amount would be the repair cost of ₹3.20 lakh, less the compulsory deductible of ₹1,000, subject to the IDV of ₹8 lakh. The IDV is not the claim amount; it is the maximum sum insured. So the gross payable would be ₹3.19 lakh, before any depreciation or betterment.
No-claim bonus. NCB is a premium discount, not a deduction from the claim. It is not subtracted from the ₹3.19 lakh. However, if a claim is made, the 20% NCB is forfeited, and the next renewal premium will be higher. That is an economic consequence for Rohit, not a reduction in this claim.
Conclusion. The calculation is only academic because the insurer can repudiate for breach of conditions. If it nevertheless admits the claim, it should pay ₹3.19 lakh and record the NCB forfeiture. It should also recover the third-party payment from Rohit separately.