Auditing Six Months of Understated Contributions at Anand Textiles
An ESIC branch audits M/s Anand Textiles for the contribution period October 2023 to March 2024. The records show 180 employees on the rolls throughout. During October–December all 180 drew ₹16,800 per month. From January 2024, 24 of them were promoted to ₹22,500 per month. Six new workers were recruited in January 2024 at ₹23,000 per month and none of them had been covered earlier. The employer deposited contributions for all 180 employees for all six months on a wage base of ₹15,000 per month, that is, on ₹1,62,00,000 at 4%. The employer says the promoted 24 and the six new workers need not be counted because they now earn more than ₹21,000. The branch must raise a demand for the shortfall with its employee and employer split, add simple interest at 12% per annum for an average delay of six months, and decide whether the employees' share can still be recovered from current wages.
1. Compute the wage base, the contribution due and the shortfall, dealing separately with the promoted 24 and the six new recruits.
Read the worked answer
The two groups are not the same. The 24 promoted employees crossed the ceiling after they were already covered, so they remain insured until the end of the current contribution period, that is 31 March 2024, and contribution is payable on their actual wages of ₹22,500. ESI has a coverage ceiling, not a contribution ceiling, so nothing is capped at ₹21,000. The six January recruits were first employed at ₹23,000, above the ceiling, so they are not insured persons and no contribution is due for them. Due wages: October–December 180 × 16,800 × 3 = ₹90,72,000; January–March (150 × 16,800 + 24 × 22,500) × 3 = ₹91,80,000; total ₹1,82,52,000. Contribution at 4% = ₹7,30,080. Deposited: ₹1,62,00,000 × 4% = ₹6,48,000. Shortfall = ₹82,080, made up of employees' share at 0.75% = ₹15,390 and employer's share at 3.25% = ₹66,690.
2. What interest is payable, and how should the recovery of the employees' share be handled?
Read the worked answer
Interest is simple, at 12% per annum on the amount withheld: ₹82,080 × 12% × 6/12 = ₹4,924.80, say ₹4,925, and it runs in addition to damages under section 85B, which are levied on a graduated scale and can reach 100% of the amount. The employer must deposit both shares; the right to recover the employee's 0.75% from wages does not reduce the demand. Recovery from wages is available, but a failure to deduct at the correct time is the employer's own lapse, and any deduction from current wages must respect the protection-of-wages limits and the rule that it cannot exceed what ought to have been deducted for the relevant months. Where the concerned employees have already left service, the employer bears the employee's share. The branch should raise the demand in writing with a month-wise working, since a demand that simply states a lump sum invites a dispute.
3. Verify the total month by month and show why the employee-employer split cannot go wrong.
Read the worked answer
Month-wise: October–December, due 3,024,000 × 4% = ₹1,20,960 against ₹1,08,000 deposited, a shortfall of ₹12,960 each month. January–March, due 3,060,000 × 4% = ₹1,22,400 against ₹1,08,000, a shortfall of ₹14,400 each month. Total = 3 × 12,960 + 3 × 14,400 = 38,880 + 43,200 = ₹82,080, which agrees with the aggregate computation. The split is structural: whatever the wage base, employees bear 0.75/4 and employers 3.25/4 of any shortfall, that is 3:13. So ₹15,390 : ₹66,690 = 3:13 is an inbuilt check - a mistake in one wage group changes the total but never the ratio, so if the ratio is wrong the arithmetic is wrong. The shortfall is 82,080/730,080 = 11.24% of the amount due, and the step up in January is caused only by the 24 promoted employees; the six new recruits must be kept out of the register altogether rather than shown with zero contribution.