GATE EY study materials
GATE EY study resources

GATE EY study plan

GATE EY · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 8 hours per week

Week 1

Engineering/Technology/Architecture (undergraduate-level subjects)

  • Map the full Engineering/Technology/Architecture (undergraduate) syllabus against the official GATE EY paper structure and mark each subsection as strong, weak, or untouched

  • Solve 30 previous-year-style numerical problems in the highest-weight undergraduate core areas and log every error with its root cause category

  • Rebuild the standard formula and derivation sheet for the core undergraduate subjects from memory, then correct it against a textbook

  • Set up a timed practice log with per-question time and accuracy so later weeks can compare against a baseline

Your checkpoint

A one-page syllabus coverage map with every subsection tagged and a baseline timed mock score recorded

Week 2

Engineering/Technology/Architecture (undergraduate-level subjects)

  • Drill the two weakest undergraduate core areas identified in week 1 using worked examples followed by 40 fresh numericals

  • Derive, without notes, the 15 most frequently used relations in those areas and check each derivation for sign and unit errors

  • Practice 20 conceptual multiple-choice items on undergraduate fundamentals and justify each answer in one written sentence

  • Reduce average solve time on core numericals to under the target per-question budget

Your checkpoint

A corrected derivation sheet plus a 40-question numerical set scored above 70 percent accuracy

Week 3

Engineering/Technology/Architecture (undergraduate-level subjects) & Science (post-graduate level subjects)

  • Complete the remaining undergraduate subsections by solving at least 10 problems per subsection

  • Start the postgraduate Science syllabus by classifying each topic into memorization, derivation, or problem-solving categories

  • Identify the three Science topics with the largest expected question share and build a first-pass concept summary for each

  • Attempt a mixed set of 25 questions drawn from both domains under a strict timer

Your checkpoint

A two-column tracker showing undergraduate completion percentage and Science topic classification with the top three Science topics summarized

Week 4

Science (post-graduate level subjects)

  • Work through the highest-weight Science topics using first-principles derivations rather than rote recall

  • Solve 50 postgraduate-level Science problems spanning at least four distinct topics

  • Write a condensed error log linking every mistake to a specific concept gap rather than to carelessness

  • Re-test the undergraduate weak areas from weeks 1 and 2 to confirm retention

Your checkpoint

A full-length timed mock covering both domains with a scored section-wise report and a ranked list of remaining gaps

Week 5

Science (post-graduate level subjects)

  • Cover the second tier of Science topics and produce a one-page summary each linking definitions, governing equations, and typical question patterns

  • Solve 40 mixed-difficulty Science problems with at least half at the harder end

  • Practice stating assumptions and boundary conditions explicitly before solving any applied Science problem

  • Cut the error rate on previously missed Science question types by half compared with week 4

Your checkpoint

A consolidated Science summary booklet of at least eight one-page topic sheets plus a scored 40-problem set

Week 6

Engineering/Technology/Architecture (undergraduate-level subjects) & Science (post-graduate level subjects)

  • Revisit every topic flagged as weak in the week 4 mock and solve 5 targeted problems per flagged topic

  • Build a single cross-domain formula and constants sheet limited to two pages

  • Complete two sectional timed tests, one per domain, and compare accuracy against the week 4 baseline

  • Eliminate any topic still untouched in either domain by at least reading a core reference and solving 3 problems

Your checkpoint

A two-page master formula sheet and a before-versus-after accuracy comparison for both sectional tests

Week 7

Engineering/Technology/Architecture (undergraduate-level subjects) & Science (post-graduate level subjects)

  • Take two full-length timed mocks under exam conditions with no interruptions and no notes

  • Analyze each mock question by question, tagging errors as concept, calculation, misread, or time pressure

  • Rehearse a question-selection strategy that banks easy marks first and returns to hard items later

  • Rebuild speed on the 20 slowest question types by repeating them in short timed bursts

Your checkpoint

Two completed full-length mocks with a categorized error breakdown and a written question-order strategy

Week 8

Engineering/Technology/Architecture (undergraduate-level subjects) & Science (post-graduate level subjects)

  • Review only the master formula sheet, error log, and topic summaries, avoiding any new material

  • Take one final full-length timed mock and target a score above the week 7 average

  • Confirm every syllabus subsection is marked covered and resolve any remaining flagged items

  • Finalize exam-day logistics including timing plan, allowed materials, and a rest schedule for the last two days

Your checkpoint

A final mock scorecard, a fully closed syllabus checklist, and a one-page exam-day plan

Milestones

Week 2: Undergraduate core coverage is at least 60 percent, the derivation sheet is self-generated and corrected, and timed numerical accuracy is at or above 70 percent

Week 4: Full syllabus has been touched at least once, a first full-length mock is scored, and every remaining gap is ranked by expected mark impact

Week 6: No syllabus subsection remains untouched, sectional accuracy has improved over the week 4 baseline, and the two-page master formula sheet is complete

Week 8: Final mock score exceeds the week 7 average, the syllabus checklist is fully closed, and the exam-day plan is written and rehearsed