Proofreading a Branch Circular Under Deadline
The LBO at a semi-urban branch must issue a circular before the 5 p.m. cut-off. The draft, typed by a newly joined clerk, reads: 'All branch staffs are hereby informed that the list of defaulting borrowers have been displayed in the notice board with effect from 1 April. Every officers are required to verify the list and revert back with their remarks by 5 p.m. today. The branch had been receiving several complaints since last week regarding an uniform application of penal charges. It is requested that penal charges should be applied as per as the RBI guidelines and the principle outstanding should be re-checked before any recovery notice is issued. Kindly do the needful at the earliest.' The branch head says it is 'good enough to send' because the meaning is clear.
1. Identify every error in the draft and correct it, naming the rule involved in each case.
Read the worked answer
Nine corrections:
- staffs → staff - 'staff' is a collective noun; the plural form is not used this way.
- have been displayed → has been displayed - subject-verb agreement; the subject is 'the list', not 'borrowers'.
- in the notice board → on the notice board - preposition of place (displayed on a board).
- Every officers are → Every officer is - 'every' takes a singular noun and singular verb.
- revert back → revert - redundancy; 'revert' already means to reply or return.
- had been receiving → has been receiving - present perfect continuous is required with 'since last week' for an action continuing to now.
- an uniform → a uniform - article choice follows the sound, not the letter; 'uniform' begins with a consonant sound /juː/.
- as per as → as per (or 'in accordance with') - 'as per' needs no second 'as'.
- principle outstanding → principal outstanding - confusable words; 'principal' is the capital sum, 'principle' is a rule.
Two further register issues, not strictly errors: 'do the needful' is archaic and vague, and 'should be applied' is weaker than 'shall be applied' in a directive. Replace with 'apply penal charges in accordance with RBI guidelines' and 'this must be completed by 5 p.m. today'.
2. Rewrite the circular in not more than 60 words, keeping every compliance instruction intact.
Read the worked answer
Revised circular (52 words):
'All branch staff are informed that the list of defaulting borrowers has been displayed on the notice board with effect from 1 April. Every officer must verify the list and reply with remarks by 5 p.m. today. The branch has been receiving complaints about inconsistent application of penal charges. Apply penal charges in accordance with RBI guidelines and re-check the principal outstanding before issuing any recovery notice.'
What was preserved: the display date, the verification duty, the 5 p.m. deadline, the penal-charge instruction, the principal re-check and the link to RBI guidelines. What was cut: the redundant 'revert back', the vague 'do the needful at the earliest', and the weak passive 'it is requested that'. The instruction to re-check the principal now sits immediately before 'before issuing any recovery notice', where it is actually needed, instead of being buried mid-sentence.
3. Which single error, if left uncorrected, most directly affects a borrower's legal position, and why? Is the branch head right that the draft is 'good enough to send'?
Read the worked answer
Most consequential error: 'principle' for 'principal'. A recovery notice tells a borrower what sum is due. Demanding the wrong quantity - a 'principle' rather than the 'principal' outstanding - is not a typo in a private note; it is a defect in a document that may be produced in a recovery proceeding or a consumer complaint, and it invites the defence that the demand was never properly made. The second most serious problem is modal: 'should be applied' reads as advice, while a circular expects 'shall' or 'must', so staff can plausibly claim the penal-charge instruction was discretionary.
The branch head is wrong. 'Meaning is clear' is not the standard for a bank circular that may be read by an auditor, a regulator or a tribunal. Agreement errors ('every officers are', 'list ... have been displayed') and the unmatched 'as per as' make the branch look careless at exactly the moment it is chasing recovery, and the redundant 'revert back' wastes the reader's time. The right call is a five-minute correction before 5 p.m., not an argument about whether readers will guess the intent.