INI-CET MDS study materials
INI-CET MDS study resources

INI-CET MDS: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics: Growth, Ceph and Biomechanics

INI-CET MDS · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics: Growth, Ceph and Biomechanics

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics

This domain tests cephalometric interpretation, Angle's classification, the biology of tooth movement, anchorage and appliance selection, and retention.

Core rules

  • Cephalometric norms: SNA 82° ± 2, SNB 80° ± 2, ANB 2° ± 2. ANB above 4° suggests a skeletal Class II pattern, below 0° a skeletal Class III.
  • Angle's classification is defined by the first molar relationship and confirmed by canines; Class I has the mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first molar in the buccal groove of the lower.
  • Orthodontic force causes PDL compression, hyalinisation and a lag phase, followed by undermining resorption; light continuous force favours direct resorption and faster movement.
  • Anchorage is the resistance to unwanted reaction force; loss shows as proclination of anterior teeth or mesial drift of posteriors. Extraoral appliances, palatal coverage and temporary anchorage devices conserve anchorage.
  • Growth modification works best in the prepubertal patient: functional appliances and headgear for Class II, facemask for Class III maxillary deficiency.
  • Retention is lifelong in principle; relapse arises from periodontal fibre recoil, occlusal factors and continued growth, so supracrestal fibreotomy and fixed retainers are used.

Worked example

A tracing gives SNA 84°, SNB 78°, ANB 6°. SNA above the norm means the maxilla is protrusive; SNB below the norm means the mandible is retrusive; ANB of 6° confirms a skeletal Class II relationship. Because both jaws contribute, the treatment implication is that masking the discrepancy by extraction alone will not correct the skeletal base in a growing patient, whereas a functional appliance may, since the mandible has growth potential remaining. The reasoning step is to always interpret ANB as a relationship, then check which jaw is responsible.

Traps

  • Reading ANB alone and concluding maxillary protrusion without checking SNA and SNB separately.
  • Applying functional appliances after the pubertal growth spurt.
  • Confusing anchorage loss with active tooth movement.