IOV Valuer study materials
IOV Valuer study resources

IOV Valuer study plan

IOV Valuer · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Valuation Principles, Standards and Ethics & Income Approach and Investment Valuation

  • Define each IOV valuation principle (market value, highest and best use, substitution, anticipation, balance, contribution, external obsolescence) and write a one-sentence working definition for each from memory

  • Map the valuation standards framework: distinguish mandatory standards, professional codes of conduct, and guidance notes, and identify which apply to IOV assignments

  • Build a personal ethics decision checklist covering conflicts of interest, confidentiality, competence boundaries, and independence, then apply it to three short hypothetical scenarios

  • Derive the direct capitalisation formula and the relationship between cap rate, discount rate, and growth, and solve five numeric drills by hand

Your checkpoint

A 2-page personal reference sheet of principles, standards hierarchy, and ethics checklist plus a worked answer set for five cap-rate drills scored at 80% or better

Week 2

Income Approach and Investment Valuation & Valuation Principles, Standards and Ethics

  • Construct a full DCF model for a hypothetical income-producing property including rent roll, vacancy, opex, capex reserve, terminal value, and discounting

  • Calculate and interpret NPV, IRR, equity dividend rate, and cash-on-cash return for the same property under two financing structures

  • Explain when each income approach method (direct cap, DCF, residual) is preferred and justify the choice in writing for three property types

  • Identify and correct the five most common DCF errors (double counting growth, mismatched nominal/real rates, terminal cap vs discount rate inconsistency, opex omissions, timing conventions)

Your checkpoint

A completed spreadsheet DCF with sensitivity table on discount rate and exit cap, plus a 400-word memo defending method selection for three property types

Week 3

Sales Comparison Approach & Market Analysis and Highest and Best Use

  • Select and adjust comparable sales for a given subject property, applying adjustments for time, location, size, condition, and transaction nature, and state the direction and magnitude rationale for each

  • Reconcile a sales comparison grid into a single value conclusion and quantify the range of indicated values

  • Conduct a highest and best use analysis through the four tests (legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible, maximally productive) for two contrasting sites

  • Define the relevant market and submarket for a subject property and list the demand and supply indicators you would collect

Your checkpoint

A completed adjustment grid with reconciled value, a range, and a written HBU conclusion for two sites, each supported by the four-test reasoning

Week 4

Legal and Regulatory Framework for Property & Cost Approach and Depreciation Analysis

  • Outline the legal interests in property (freehold, leasehold, easements, encumbrances, strata/title arrangements) and explain how each affects the valuation basis and assumptions

  • Identify the regulatory constraints that shape value: planning and zoning, environmental and heritage controls, building codes, and disclosure obligations, and note where to verify each

  • Apply all three depreciation methods (age-life, modified age-life, breakdown) to the same hypothetical building and reconcile the differences

  • Calculate replacement cost new, depreciated improvements, and site value, then reconcile into a cost approach value and explain when this approach is most and least reliable

Your checkpoint

A cost approach worksheet for one building showing all three depreciation methods side by side with a reconciliation note, plus a one-page legal and regulatory constraints checklist

Week 5

Market Analysis and Highest and Best Use & Sales Comparison Approach

  • Build a market analysis template covering macroeconomic drivers, local supply pipeline, absorption, vacancy, rents, and capitalisation rate trends

  • Extract market evidence from at least three data sources and cross-check conflicting figures, documenting which you relied on and why

  • Re-run the week 3 comparable grid with fresh market data and explain any change in the value conclusion

  • Draft a highest and best use section suitable for inclusion in a client report, including the interim use test

Your checkpoint

A market analysis section of 600-800 words with cited data sources and a revised sales comparison conclusion showing the delta from week 3

Week 6

Valuation of Special-Purpose and Non-Market Assets & Cost Approach and Depreciation Analysis

  • Classify special-purpose and non-market assets (plant, infrastructure, specialised healthcare, heritage, leasehold-only interests) and state the valuation approach each demands and why

  • Explain the concept of depreciated replacement cost and its role where no market evidence exists, and apply it to one specialised asset

  • Identify the inputs and limitations of the cost approach when market comparables are absent, and describe how to disclose those limitations

  • Analyse how a non-market or thin-market asset changes the treatment of obsolescence and the reliability of the value conclusion

Your checkpoint

A case write-up of one specialised asset applying depreciated replacement cost, with a limitations and disclosure paragraph and a sensitivity note on key assumptions

Week 7

Report Writing and Professional Practice & Emerging Issues in Valuation (sustainability, ESG, technology)

  • Draft a full valuation report skeleton to recognised report standards, covering scope of work, basis of value, assumptions and special assumptions, sources, and limiting conditions

  • Write the reconciliation and value conclusion section so that the reasoning from all applied approaches is traceable to the final figure

  • Explain how sustainability and ESG factors (energy performance, transition risk, physical climate risk, green certification) can be reflected in cash flows, discount rates, and market evidence

  • Assess how technology (automated valuation models, data platforms, remote inspection, AI-assisted analysis) changes the valuer's role, and state the professional obligations around verification and disclosure

Your checkpoint

A complete mock valuation report of 1,500-2,000 words including an ESG and technology section, self-marked against a report standards checklist

Week 8

Valuation Principles, Standards and Ethics & Income Approach and Investment Valuation & Report Writing and Professional Practice

  • Synthesise all domains into a one-page decision map linking property type and purpose to approach, method, and key assumptions

  • Complete two full timed mock valuation scenarios end to end, from scope through conclusion, within the exam time allocation

  • Review every error from the mocks, classify each as knowledge gap, method error, or presentation error, and close each gap with a targeted drill

  • Rehearse concise written explanations of ethics dilemmas and standards compliance, since these are commonly examined in short-answer form

Your checkpoint

Two completed timed mock valuations with a scored error log showing every identified gap closed and a final one-page decision map

Milestones

Week 2: Can build a DCF from a blank spreadsheet in under 45 minutes and correctly explain the difference between IRR and NPV in the context of a leveraged property

Week 4: Can produce a sales comparison reconciliation, an HBU conclusion, and a cost approach value for one property, with all three approaches internally consistent and each adjustment or depreciation figure defensible

Week 6: Can justify in writing why a specialised asset cannot be valued by direct comparison and can defend a depreciated replacement cost conclusion against two challenge questions

Week 8: Scores 70% or higher on both timed mocks, with no repeated error category from the week 7 report and a completed decision map covering all nine domains