IOV Valuer study plan
IOV Valuer · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Valuation Principles, Standards and Ethics & Income Approach and Investment Valuation
Define each IOV valuation principle (market value, highest and best use, substitution, anticipation, balance, contribution, external obsolescence) and write a one-sentence working definition for each from memory
Map the valuation standards framework: distinguish mandatory standards, professional codes of conduct, and guidance notes, and identify which apply to IOV assignments
Build a personal ethics decision checklist covering conflicts of interest, confidentiality, competence boundaries, and independence, then apply it to three short hypothetical scenarios
Derive the direct capitalisation formula and the relationship between cap rate, discount rate, and growth, and solve five numeric drills by hand
Your checkpoint
A 2-page personal reference sheet of principles, standards hierarchy, and ethics checklist plus a worked answer set for five cap-rate drills scored at 80% or better
Income Approach and Investment Valuation & Valuation Principles, Standards and Ethics
Construct a full DCF model for a hypothetical income-producing property including rent roll, vacancy, opex, capex reserve, terminal value, and discounting
Calculate and interpret NPV, IRR, equity dividend rate, and cash-on-cash return for the same property under two financing structures
Explain when each income approach method (direct cap, DCF, residual) is preferred and justify the choice in writing for three property types
Identify and correct the five most common DCF errors (double counting growth, mismatched nominal/real rates, terminal cap vs discount rate inconsistency, opex omissions, timing conventions)
Your checkpoint
A completed spreadsheet DCF with sensitivity table on discount rate and exit cap, plus a 400-word memo defending method selection for three property types
Sales Comparison Approach & Market Analysis and Highest and Best Use
Select and adjust comparable sales for a given subject property, applying adjustments for time, location, size, condition, and transaction nature, and state the direction and magnitude rationale for each
Reconcile a sales comparison grid into a single value conclusion and quantify the range of indicated values
Conduct a highest and best use analysis through the four tests (legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible, maximally productive) for two contrasting sites
Define the relevant market and submarket for a subject property and list the demand and supply indicators you would collect
Your checkpoint
A completed adjustment grid with reconciled value, a range, and a written HBU conclusion for two sites, each supported by the four-test reasoning
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Property & Cost Approach and Depreciation Analysis
Outline the legal interests in property (freehold, leasehold, easements, encumbrances, strata/title arrangements) and explain how each affects the valuation basis and assumptions
Identify the regulatory constraints that shape value: planning and zoning, environmental and heritage controls, building codes, and disclosure obligations, and note where to verify each
Apply all three depreciation methods (age-life, modified age-life, breakdown) to the same hypothetical building and reconcile the differences
Calculate replacement cost new, depreciated improvements, and site value, then reconcile into a cost approach value and explain when this approach is most and least reliable
Your checkpoint
A cost approach worksheet for one building showing all three depreciation methods side by side with a reconciliation note, plus a one-page legal and regulatory constraints checklist
Market Analysis and Highest and Best Use & Sales Comparison Approach
Build a market analysis template covering macroeconomic drivers, local supply pipeline, absorption, vacancy, rents, and capitalisation rate trends
Extract market evidence from at least three data sources and cross-check conflicting figures, documenting which you relied on and why
Re-run the week 3 comparable grid with fresh market data and explain any change in the value conclusion
Draft a highest and best use section suitable for inclusion in a client report, including the interim use test
Your checkpoint
A market analysis section of 600-800 words with cited data sources and a revised sales comparison conclusion showing the delta from week 3
Valuation of Special-Purpose and Non-Market Assets & Cost Approach and Depreciation Analysis
Classify special-purpose and non-market assets (plant, infrastructure, specialised healthcare, heritage, leasehold-only interests) and state the valuation approach each demands and why
Explain the concept of depreciated replacement cost and its role where no market evidence exists, and apply it to one specialised asset
Identify the inputs and limitations of the cost approach when market comparables are absent, and describe how to disclose those limitations
Analyse how a non-market or thin-market asset changes the treatment of obsolescence and the reliability of the value conclusion
Your checkpoint
A case write-up of one specialised asset applying depreciated replacement cost, with a limitations and disclosure paragraph and a sensitivity note on key assumptions
Report Writing and Professional Practice & Emerging Issues in Valuation (sustainability, ESG, technology)
Draft a full valuation report skeleton to recognised report standards, covering scope of work, basis of value, assumptions and special assumptions, sources, and limiting conditions
Write the reconciliation and value conclusion section so that the reasoning from all applied approaches is traceable to the final figure
Explain how sustainability and ESG factors (energy performance, transition risk, physical climate risk, green certification) can be reflected in cash flows, discount rates, and market evidence
Assess how technology (automated valuation models, data platforms, remote inspection, AI-assisted analysis) changes the valuer's role, and state the professional obligations around verification and disclosure
Your checkpoint
A complete mock valuation report of 1,500-2,000 words including an ESG and technology section, self-marked against a report standards checklist
Valuation Principles, Standards and Ethics & Income Approach and Investment Valuation & Report Writing and Professional Practice
Synthesise all domains into a one-page decision map linking property type and purpose to approach, method, and key assumptions
Complete two full timed mock valuation scenarios end to end, from scope through conclusion, within the exam time allocation
Review every error from the mocks, classify each as knowledge gap, method error, or presentation error, and close each gap with a targeted drill
Rehearse concise written explanations of ethics dilemmas and standards compliance, since these are commonly examined in short-answer form
Your checkpoint
Two completed timed mock valuations with a scored error log showing every identified gap closed and a final one-page decision map
Milestones
Week 2: Can build a DCF from a blank spreadsheet in under 45 minutes and correctly explain the difference between IRR and NPV in the context of a leveraged property
Week 4: Can produce a sales comparison reconciliation, an HBU conclusion, and a cost approach value for one property, with all three approaches internally consistent and each adjustment or depreciation figure defensible
Week 6: Can justify in writing why a specialised asset cannot be valued by direct comparison and can defend a depreciated replacement cost conclusion against two challenge questions
Week 8: Scores 70% or higher on both timed mocks, with no repeated error category from the week 7 report and a completed decision map covering all nine domains