Third-Party Property Damage: Contributory Negligence and Consequential Loss
A private car insured by Mr. Verma hit a roadside shop and a parked two-wheeler. The shop claims ₹2,80,000: ₹1,20,000 for shutter and glass repairs, ₹50,000 for lost business for 20 days, and ₹1,10,000 for structural repairs. The two-wheeler owner claims ₹45,000 for repairs and ₹5,000 for loss of use. The police sketch shows that the shop had illegally extended a concrete platform 3 feet onto the road, and the insured car was travelling at about 60 km/h in a 40 km/h zone. The surveyor assesses the shop's actual repair cost at ₹1,50,000 (including structural), the two-wheeler repair at ₹35,000, and finds no documentary proof for lost business. The policy has third-party property damage cover of ₹7.5 lakh. The insured has no own damage cover.
1. Assess the admissible third-party property damage claim and explain each deduction.
Read the worked answer
Third-party property damage is assessed on the insured's legal liability, not on the third party's claim. Allow the shop's actual repair cost ₹1,50,000 (the surveyor's assessment), not the claimed ₹2,80,000. Disallow ₹50,000 lost business: it is consequential loss, not damage to property, and is undocumented. Allow two-wheeler repair ₹35,000; disallow ₹5,000 loss of use for the same reason. Sub-total = ₹1,85,000. Then apply contributory negligence: the shop's illegal platform protruding 3 feet onto the road contributed to the collision. A 20% reduction on the shop's damage is reasonable: ₹1,50,000 × 80% = ₹1,20,000. The parked two-wheeler was not contributory, so allow ₹35,000 in full. Admissible TP property damage = ₹1,55,000, within the ₹7.5 lakh limit. The insured's speeding is his own negligence; it does not reduce the third party's damages but may affect criminal proceedings.
2. How does the shop's illegal platform affect the insurer's liability?
Read the worked answer
The shop's platform is a contributing cause. Under tort, the third party's own negligence reduces the insured's liability. The surveyor should obtain the police sketch, site photographs, and municipal records to prove the encroachment. If the shop disputes the 20% reduction, the insurer may negotiate a compromise; if litigated, the court will apportion. The reduction is applied only to the shop's claim, not to the innocent two-wheeler owner.
3. What is the insurer's position if the total third-party claims exceed ₹7.5 lakh?
Read the worked answer
If the total admissible TP claims exceed ₹7.5 lakh, the insurer pays only up to the policy limit; the insured is personally liable for the excess. The surveyor should notify the insured in writing and recommend legal representation. The limit is per occurrence/claim; multiple claimants share the limit. The insurer should not settle above the limit without the insured's consent, because any excess is the insured's personal liability.