The Theyyam photograph in a tourism campaign
Kerala Tourism's agency in Thiruvananthapuram is finalising a ₹40 lakh digital campaign for the 'Responsible Tourism' season. The creative team finds a striking Instagram photo of a Theyyam performer in full costume, posted by a freelance photographer based in Payyanur. The post has 8,000 likes, no watermark, and a caption 'from last season's ritual'. The agency's deadline is 48 hours; the photo fits the layout perfectly. The photographer replies: 'Happy to discuss, but my usual fee is ₹25,000 per image and I need a credit.' The agency's contract template has no image licence clause; the client wants global rights for three years. A cultural adviser warns that the image shows a ritual moment that some communities consider sacred and not 'tourism decoration'. The campaign budget has ₹15,000 left for image rights.
1. Can the agency use the Instagram photo without a licence? Explain.
Read the worked answer
No. Under the Copyright Act, the photographer owns copyright in the photograph from the moment it is created, unless it was made under a contract of service. A public Instagram post is not a free licence; the platform's terms allow display on Instagram, not commercial use in a tourism campaign. The agency's proposed use - paid digital ads for three years, worldwide - is commercial and broad. Fair dealing for news or criticism does not cover advertising. Using it without permission would infringe copyright and the photographer's moral right to attribution. The ₹15,000 remaining budget is below the quoted ₹25,000, so the agency must either negotiate a narrower licence (one year, Kerala only, digital only), choose a cheaper image, or ask the client to increase the budget. It should not crop out a watermark or use the image while 'discussing'.
2. Draft the main terms you would negotiate and explain why each matters.
Read the worked answer
- Licence scope: media (digital and print), territory (Kerala/India), duration (one year, not three), and exclusivity (non-exclusive). 2) Fee: ₹15,000–₹25,000 within budget; if global three-year rights are needed, ask the client for extra. 3) Credit: 'Photo: [name]' on the campaign landing page and in the ad's alt text; this respects moral rights. 4) Edits: no cropping that changes the ritual's meaning; no AI manipulation. 5) Cultural clearance: consult the Theyyam performer's community and avoid captions that call the ritual 'entertainment'. 6) Indemnity: the photographer warrants he owns the image. 7) Termination if the campaign is pulled. Reasoning: a licence is a bundle of rights; paying for the wrong bundle creates legal risk and reputational damage. The cultural term is not a legal right in the same way, but it protects the client from a backlash.
3. The cultural adviser says the image is sacred. How should the agency respond?
Read the worked answer
First, separate legal from cultural risk. Legally, the photographer's licence is the main issue. Culturally, using a Theyyam image as generic 'tourism decoration' can misrepresent a ritual practised by specific communities. The agency should ask the photographer and a local cultural expert whether the image shows a moment that is appropriate for commercial use; if not, choose another image. If it is used, the caption should name the ritual and its context, not just 'Kerala's colourful traditions'. The agency should also consider a community consultation or a small fee to a local cultural group. The response should be documented in the campaign brief. Reasoning: tourism advertising relies on trust; a visually strong image that offends a community can cost more than the ₹40 lakh campaign. The deadline is not a reason to skip this step; a two-day delay is cheaper than a boycott.