Kannada sentence structure and word formation
Kannada grammatical analysis should connect a form to its actual role. In ರಾಮನು ಹಣ್ಣನ್ನು ತಿಂದನು, ರಾಮನು identifies the actor and ಹಣ್ಣನ್ನು identifies what is eaten. In ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿಗೆ ಪುಸ್ತಕ ಕೊಟ್ಟರು, the learner-related form expresses a recipient. The ending alone is useful evidence, but the verb and complete relation prevent a mechanical classification based only on the English noun.
Compare finite and nonfinite constructions, agreement and time reference. A sentence containing ನಿನ್ನೆ requires interpretation of a past setting; an auxiliary can contribute aspect rather than become a second unrelated action. Respectful forms and plural forms should be evaluated in context. Replacing a noun does not automatically preserve a matching finite verb.
For ಸಂಧಿ, recover the joining parts, identify the boundary sounds and explain the change before naming a rule. In ಸಮಾಸ, ask whether members are coordinated, one depends on another or the whole expression refers beyond its individual members. Distinguish an original Kannada word, a Sanskrit-derived form and a loan without assuming that every unfamiliar word belongs to the same category. These are shared foundations. Exact terminology, required paradigms and the full prescribed exercises should be checked against the intended AP SSC or Karnataka II PUC materials.