A Washing Machine, a Disconnected Extended Warranty and a WhatsApp Promise
In August, Mr Prakash Jadhav of Kolhapur bought a front-load washing machine for ₹38,500 from a local dealer, paying ₹3,500 extra for a two-year extended warranty sold by the dealer. The drum failed in the fifth month. The authorised service centre says the failure is due to user overload and has quoted ₹7,200 for parts; the dealer says the extended warranty is handled by a third-party insurer whose phone number is disconnected. The brand's original warranty booklet gives one year comprehensive cover. Mr Jadhav has the invoice, the extended-warranty receipt bearing only the dealer's rubber stamp, the service centre's job sheet, photographs of the damaged drum, and a WhatsApp chat in which the dealer promised full replacement if anything goes wrong in two years. He has already paid ₹500 as a visit charge. He wants to discard the machine and buy a new one on EMI. His wife wants to approach the consumer commission.
1. Identify the consumer rights engaged and the defects in the paperwork. Was the dealer's conduct an unfair trade practice? Explain your reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Rights engaged: the right to safety (a drum failure in a front-load machine can be dangerous), the right to information (clear terms of the extended warranty), the right to be heard, the right to seek redressal, and the right to consumer education.
The paperwork has three defects. First, the extended-warranty receipt has only a rubber stamp and no policy number, insurer name, terms, exclusions or claim procedure; a consumer cannot enforce a contract whose terms are not disclosed. Second, the dealer sold the warranty and took the money, so the dealer remains the point of contact; saying it is handled by a third party with a disconnected phone is a deficiency in service, not a valid defence. Third, the service centre's diagnosis of user overload is an assertion that must be supported by evidence - a job sheet recording load, installation and usage - not merely a quotation for parts.
On these facts the dealer's conduct is likely an unfair trade practice: a false or misleading representation about the nature and extent of a warranty, and an unclear warranty product sold without terms. The WhatsApp promise is evidence of what was represented at the point of sale, even though it is informal. The original one-year brand warranty is separate; if the drum failed in the fifth month without misuse, the manufacturer must show misuse before charging for parts.
2. Set out, in order, the steps Mr Jadhav should take, the documents he must preserve, the forum and limitation period, and your advice on repair versus replacement.
Read the worked answer
Steps, in order:
- Do not discard the machine. It is the primary evidence; buying a new one on EMI also weakens any claim for consequential loss and adds avoidable debt.
- Write a dated complaint by email and registered post to the dealer and to the brand's customer care, describing the purchase, the extended warranty, the failure, the disconnected number and the ₹500 visit charge. Demand a written response within 15 days. Keep the postal receipt and email copy.
- Ask the service centre for the job sheet and a written, signed diagnosis; do not sign any satisfaction or discharge form.
- If no response, send a legal notice and then file before the District Consumer Commission. Under the 2021 jurisdiction rules, a claim of this size falls within the District Commission; the limitation period is two years from the date of the cause of action, usually the failure or the refusal to honour the warranty.
Preserve: invoice, extended-warranty receipt, warranty booklet, WhatsApp chat, job sheet, photographs and video of the drum, payment proof for ₹500, and all correspondence.
Repair or replacement: demand replacement or refund first, because a fifth-month drum failure points to a manufacturing defect; offer to accept a repair only with a written assurance that the repair is under warranty, that the part carries a fresh warranty, and that the ₹500 is refunded. A repair without admission preserves the dealer's position and may fail again. The ₹38,500 price plus compensation can be claimed, but the discarded packaging is not fatal - dated photographs and the job sheet can establish the condition.