The Bruise, the Shared House and the Absent Protection Officer
Seema, 29, lives in a low-income colony on the edge of Bhopal with her husband, her parents-in-law and her two children - a four-year-old who attends the Anganwadi centre and an eight-month-old who is still breastfeeding. The house is registered in her mother-in-law's name. For six months her husband and father-in-law have beaten her, taunted her over an inadequate dowry and stopped her from visiting her parents, who live two districts away. Last week her husband pushed her against a wall; there is bruising on her upper arm but no medical record. She tells the Anganwadi worker that she does not want to file an FIR against her husband. She also does not want to leave the house, because her son's centre and her husband's income are there, and her parents have said a returned daughter would be a burden. The block Protection Officer is on leave for ten days and the One Stop Centre is 22 km away. Seema has no bank account in her own name and has never been inside a courtroom.
1. What relief is available to Seema under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and does she have to leave the shared household to get it?
Read the worked answer
She does not have to leave, and the ownership of the house is not decisive.
- Who is protected: Seema is an "aggrieved person" - a woman in a domestic relationship who has been subjected to physical and economic abuse. The house is a "shared household" because she has lived in it in a domestic relationship; the section 2(s) definition turns on residence, not title. Seema's mother-in-law owning the property does not destroy Seema's right to reside there (section 17).
- What she can ask for: a protection order (s.18) restraining the husband and father-in-law from committing further violence, from aiding or abetting it, and from entering the portion of the house she uses; a residence order (s.19) so she cannot be evicted or excluded from the shared household, or in the alternative a rented alternative; monetary relief (s.20) for maintenance, medical expenses and loss of earnings; a custody order (s.21) for both children; compensation (s.22) for the mental torture.
- Urgency: section 23 allows the Magistrate to grant these as interim or ex parte orders on the very first hearing, which is the correct route here rather than waiting for the Protection Officer to return.
Reasoning to state plainly: the DV Act is a civil remedy and deliberately does not depend on a criminal complaint. An FIR is one option, not the entry ticket. Her refusal of an FIR does not close the residence, protection or maintenance route.
2. The Anganwadi worker has no legal training. What is her lawful role in this case, and what must she avoid doing?
Read the worked answer
Her role is to inform, record, connect and refer - not to adjudicate or reconcile.
- Inform: explain in Seema's own language that she has a right to reside in the house, to a protection order and to maintenance, and that free legal aid and a shelter home exist.
- Enable the application: under section 12 an application may be filed by the aggrieved woman, by the Protection Officer, or by any person on her behalf. The worker can therefore help draft and submit the section 12 application before the Judicial Magistrate First Class if the Protection Officer is unavailable, enclosing her own written account of what she observed (the bruise, the dates, the confinement).
- Record: keep a dated, factual note, and give Seema a copy. Do not record it in a public register or in front of the in-laws.
- Refer: the One Stop Centre (Sakhi), the District Legal Services Authority for a free lawyer, 181 for telephonic support, and a shelter home as a contingency, not a condition.
Must avoid: brokering a compromise or a panchayat settlement; treating "no FIR" as "no case"; disclosing her address or statement to the husband's family; holding her documents; accepting money; and promising a particular outcome. The fundamental error to avoid is recommending separation as the only lawful remedy when the Act expressly protects her place in the home.
3. Seema wants to stay in the house and avoid a police case. Set out a practical ten-day action plan, with the reasoning behind the sequence.
Read the worked answer
Sequence matters: safety evidence first, legal protection second, entitlements third.
Day 1 - risk and evidence. Private interview; ask about strangulation, weapons, threats to kill, and threats regarding the children; photograph the bruise; write a dated note signed by Seema. Fix an emergency signal and a neighbour's number. If the risk is high, arrange shelter contact before anything else.
Day 2–3 - legal protection. Section 12 application before the Magistrate with a section 23 request for interim protection, residence and monetary relief; DLSA lawyer assigned; inform 181 and the One Stop Centre even if the Protection Officer is on leave.
Day 4–5 - medical and records. Medical examination and a written record of the injury, plus antenatal/child health needs; collect MCP card, ration card, Aadhaar, marriage proof, school/Anganwadi enrolment of the children.
Day 6–8 - financial independence. Jan Dhan account in her name, Aadhaar seeding, and entitlements through the Anganwadi (supplementary nutrition for the eight-month-old, take-home ration). Money in her own account is what makes a residence order survivable.
Day 9–10 - review. Re-check whether violence has recurred; confirm hearing date; enrol her in an SHG or skill group only if she wants it.
Reasoning: the legal remedy is fast only if evidence and documentation are ready; the economic remedy is what allows her to use the legal one.