Rakesh: Retirement Readiness Versus a Commissioned 'Guaranteed' Product
Rakesh, 56, is a salaried operations manager earning ₹2.4 lakh a month. His wife is a homemaker, their daughter is in college, and his 82-year-old father lives with them. Rakesh wants to retire at 60. Current assets: EPF ₹60 lakh, NPS ₹20 lakh, equity mutual funds ₹25 lakh, cash ₹5 lakh, and a ₹30 lakh inheritance received last month. He has a ₹30 lakh home loan at 8.5% with 7 years left and no health insurance apart from a ₹3 lakh employer cover that ends on retirement. Monthly household expenses are ₹90,000. A bank relationship manager is urging him to put the inheritance into a single-premium product paying the RM a 5% commission and promising 'guaranteed 12% returns'. Rakesh asks whether he can retire at 60 and whether the product is suitable.
1. Is Rakesh on track to retire at 60? Show the main checks and an approximate corpus gap, stating your assumptions.
Read the worked answer
Separate the retirement goal from the product. At 6% inflation, ₹90,000 today becomes about ₹1.14 lakh a month at 60, or roughly ₹13.6 lakh a year. Using a 4% initial withdrawal rate, a rough corpus target is ₹3.4 crore; 25 times annual spending gives a similar figure. Current net investable assets are about ₹1.10 crore after deducting the ₹30 lakh loan, including the inheritance, so the gap is roughly ₹2.3 crore in four years. That is a large gap: he needs aggressive saving, a loan review, and realistic return assumptions, not a promised 12%. Also check whether spending falls after retirement, whether the daughter's future costs are separate, and whether the father's care costs are funded. The correct conclusion is 'not yet on track on stated assumptions', with the projection shown transparently. Do not treat the inheritance as surplus until the loan, emergency reserve and insurance are addressed.
2. Rakesh asks you to recommend the single-premium product because the RM says it is guaranteed and safe. What should you do?
Read the worked answer
Do not accept the 'guaranteed 12%' claim. Explain that a return is guaranteed only if the contract legally guarantees it, and a 12% promise on a savings-type product is a red flag. Disclose in writing any commission you or your firm would earn and compare the product's lock-in, surrender charges, credit risk, liquidity and tax treatment with alternatives. Because Rakesh has a home loan, no emergency fund and no post-retirement health cover, a long-lock-in single-premium product is unlikely to be suitable for the inheritance. If you are commission-based, document why any product is suitable and show lower-cost alternatives; if you cannot manage the conflict, refer him to a fee-only adviser. Never record the product as suitable merely because he has cash available.
3. What additional information would you collect before finalising advice?
Read the worked answer
Collect the exact loan terms, prepayment penalty and whether the rate is fixed or floating; the spouse's and father's health and care costs; the daughter's education funding plan; existing insurance, nominations and will; Rakesh's tax slab and deductions; his risk tolerance and actual capacity for loss; current emergency fund; expected pension or annuity income; and whether the inheritance is earmarked for a family purpose. Also verify his real monthly expenses, any support he gives relatives, and his expected longevity family history. Without these, a retirement projection is false precision. The adviser should also check whether the RM's product illustration uses optimistic assumptions and whether Rakesh understands that employer health cover ends at retirement.