Thirty children who can recite but not answer
Anita Das teaches English to Class IV, 38 children, in a government school in Cuttack district. Her English period has followed the textbook closely: reciting the rhyme in the first unit, word lists with meanings, and copying the questions at the end of the lesson. In an oral check she asked six questions - What is your name? How old are you? Where do you live? What did you eat today? - and recorded that 30 of 38 children could recite the rhyme without error, but only 4 answered any question without prompting. When she repeated the questions with a one-word Odia gloss, 19 children answered. A visiting supervisor wrote in the inspection note that the teacher 'resorts to the mother tongue excessively; the English period must be conducted in English only', and asked for a written reply. Anita has one week. Her next unit is 'My Family', with pictures of family members.
1. Interpret the numbers 30, 4 and 19. What exactly do they tell you about these children's English?
Read the worked answer
The three numbers measure three different things. The 30 who recite the rhyme have learned a sound sequence attached to a tune; they can produce it without understanding it, the way one can sing a song in an unknown language. That is ritualised language, not communicative competence. The 4 who answer a personal question unprompted are the only children with any productive control of English, and even they may be running a memorised formula. The jump to 19 with a one-word gloss is the key figure: fifteen more children know the answer and are willing to speak, but cannot process the English question fast enough or lack the words to reply.
So the problem is neither ability nor vocabulary alone. The class has had almost no experience of English as a means of saying something real; reciting and copying cannot build that. The pedagogical implication is precise: keep the rhyme, because it gives phonology and confidence, but add short, predictable, daily interaction in English, and use the first language briefly to make the input comprehensible rather than to explain grammar. Note also that the 4 may understate the class, since children need wait time before answering.
2. Write the substance of Anita's reply to the supervisor. Concede what is fair, defend what is justified, and make the plan verifiable.
Read the worked answer
Concede the principle, defend the practice, put a number on it. Reply that English is and will remain the main medium of the English period, and that the Odia used was a planned, time-limited bridge rather than a substitute. Give the evidence: with English-only questions, 4 of 38 answered; with a one-word Odia gloss, 19 did. The gloss changed comprehension, not the language of the answer - the children still replied in English.
Then commit to a rule the supervisor can check: no full-sentence Odia explanations, only word-level glosses, not more than about two minutes in a 40-minute period, with the share of English rising across the term. Show the daily 15-minute routine: three minutes of greeting and register in English ('Who is absent?', 'What day is it?'); five minutes of five classroom commands practised as actions - open, close, show me, bring, look; seven minutes of picture talk on 'My Family' with three fixed frames - 'This is my...', 'He is a...', 'I have...' - first in chorus, then in pairs.
Set a measurable target for the month: every child answers two of five personal questions without a prompt. This answers the note in its own terms - less first language, more English, and evidence rather than assertion.
3. Anita has ten minutes of class time to assess the speaking of all 38 children. Design a workable procedure and justify it.
Read the worked answer
Do not test 38 children individually in ten minutes; sample and embed. Two layers. (1) A rolling oral check across the week: eight children a day for one minute each with the same five questions, while the rest do paired picture talk; record on a simple grid with three columns - answers without prompting / answers with a prompt / silent. Within a week all 38 are covered without losing teaching time. (2) Pair performance in class: each pair describes a family picture to another pair using the three target frames; the teacher circulates with a three-point checklist (uses 'This is', uses 'He/She is', speaks without reading from the book) and notes only what is seen.
Keep a special watch on the 4 who answered unprompted and the 15 who answered with a gloss - those 19 are the progress group; check them fortnightly. Use the same five questions each time so that change is measurable, and let children rehearse in pairs first, because the purpose is to assess speaking, not to spring a test. This is sampling with a purpose rather than a deficit compromise: a one-minute sample of five familiar questions is enough to show whether a child can answer, and it protects teaching time.