Patent Agent Exam study plan

Map the statutory backbone of patentability (35 U.S.C. 101, 102, 103, 112) into a one-page decision tree you can redraw from memory

Distinguish the four statutory claim categories and apply the judicial exceptions to three hypothetical claims

Deconstruct each independent claim into preamble, transition, and body, and label every limitation

Compare means-plus-function claim format against structural claiming and state when 112(f) is triggered

Classify prior art under 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2), including the effective filing date rules and the 102(b)(1) and 102(b)(2) exceptions

Apply the Graham v. John Deere framework to evaluate obviousness in a written fact pattern

Explain the difference between anticipation and obviousness with a claim chart for each

Identify the scope of 112(a) enablement, written description, and best mode obligations

Apply the Alice/Mayo two-step test to software and diagnostic claims and predict outcomes

Analyze claim definiteness under 112(b) using the Nautilus reasonable-certainty standard

Interpret claim terms under Phillips using intrinsic evidence first and extrinsic evidence second

Explain how prosecution history estoppel and claim vitiation limit doctrine of equivalents

Draft a complete specification for a mechanical invention with title, cross-reference, background, summary, detailed description, and claims

Write an abstract that satisfies 37 CFR 1.72(b) in under 150 words

Structure a claim set with independent and dependent claims that avoid multiple dependent claim fees and improper incorporation

Build a 112(a) support map linking each claim limitation to a paragraph in the specification

Prepare an information disclosure statement under 37 CFR 1.97 with the correct timing and fee determination

Draft a non-final Office action response that amends claims and argues against a 103 rejection without introducing new matter

Draft an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.132 to rebut a rejection

Identify when a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part is the correct filing vehicle

Sequence the steps of filing a non-provisional application through the USPTO electronic filing system, including ADS, fees, and filing receipt review

Calculate small and micro entity status under 37 CFR 1.27 and 1.29 for three fact patterns

Apply the duty of disclosure and candor under 37 CFR 1.56 to hypothetical misconduct scenarios

Distinguish ex parte reexamination, inter partes review, and post-grant review by forum, timing, and estoppel

Outline the disciplinary rules governing practitioner conduct before the Office, including 37 CFR 11.18 signature certifications

Analyze conflict-of-interest and client-confidentiality scenarios under the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct

Explain the ex parte appeal path from final rejection to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, including the notice of appeal and appeal brief

Draft a Notice of Appeal and an appeal brief outline for a mock final rejection

Complete two full-length timed practice exams under exam conditions and score each domain separately

Review every missed question and write a one-line rule statement for each error

Re-derive from memory the statutory decision tree, the 102 prior art framework, and the 112(a) and 112(b) standards

Assemble a personal one-page quick-reference sheet of the twenty rules you most often miss