Label Review for a New Mixed Fruit Jam in Jalandhar
An entrepreneur in Jalandhar plans to sell mixed fruit jam in 200 g PET jars. The recipe uses 45% mixed fruit pulp, 55% sugar, citric acid and pectin; a permitted colour is added. The draft label reads: MIXED FRUIT JAM; 100% Natural; No Preservatives; Rich in Vitamin C; Net Quantity 200 g; Best Before: 08/26; Manufactured by: A.B. Foods, Jalandhar. It has no FSSAI licence number, no batch number, no ingredient list, no nutrition information and no storage instruction. The entrepreneur argues that the product is natural because fruit is the main ingredient and that the colour is only a little. The first print run is 10,000 labels, and the jars are ready. He asks whether he can start selling while he applies for a licence.
1. Identify the labelling and regulatory gaps in the draft label. For each gap, state why it matters to a consumer or inspector.
Read the worked answer
The draft lacks several mandatory declarations: an ingredient list in descending order, nutrition information, the FSSAI licence number, a batch number, a complete best-before date, storage instructions, and the full manufacturer address. The vegetarian/non-vegetarian mark and allergen information may also be required depending on the final recipe. The net quantity is present, but the label should use the prescribed format. The claim 100% Natural is questionable because the product contains added citric acid, pectin and a permitted colour; even permitted additives must be declared, and a natural claim must be truthful and not misleading. No Preservatives may be true, but it should not imply a longer shelf life than the product can deliver. Rich in Vitamin C is a nutrition claim and needs a measurable basis. Selling before licensing is not acceptable; the licence number must appear before the product is placed on the market.
2. Evaluate the claims 100% Natural and Rich in Vitamin C. What evidence or wording changes would you require before the labels are printed?
Read the worked answer
100% Natural is risky because the recipe includes a permitted colour and added pectin and citric acid. The entrepreneur should either remove the claim or reword it to something that is accurate, such as a statement about fruit content, only if the fruit content is correctly declared. Rich in Vitamin C requires a validated nutrient analysis or a calculation from a reliable database; the claim must meet the applicable threshold and be supported in the nutrition table. A small batch analysis at a recognised laboratory would be proportionate before printing 10,000 labels. If the vitamin C level is not consistently above the threshold, the claim should be deleted. The colour must be declared by its permitted name or class, and the label should not use the word natural to disguise an additive. These changes reduce the risk of a misleading-claim finding and a costly reprint.
3. Draft a corrective action plan for the label and the launch. Include the sequence of actions and what should happen to the 10,000 printed labels.
Read the worked answer
Do not sell the jars with the current labels. First, finalise the recipe and confirm that the fruit pulp content meets the applicable jam standard; if it does not, rename the product rather than calling it jam. Second, obtain or confirm the FSSAI licence and the correct licence number. Third, prepare a compliant label with ingredient list, nutrition information, veg/non-veg mark, net quantity, batch number, full date, storage instruction, manufacturer name and address, and allergen declaration if needed. Fourth, validate or delete the natural and vitamin C claims. Fifth, have the label checked before printing, then destroy or overstamp the unusable 10,000 labels only in a way that is permitted; do not stick a new label over key mandatory information. Sequence: licence and product standard first, then claims and nutrition, then artwork approval, then print. Launch only after the label and licence are in place.