Contract packer, unlawful deductions and who pays
Sunrise Knitwear Pvt. Ltd. runs a hosiery factory in Ludhiana with 240 employees. It engages M/s Bhandari Manpower, a licensed contractor, to supply 30 packers. The contractor's licence was suspended in February for non-payment of wages, but the principal employer kept the same workers on the floor. Gurmeet Singh, a packer on a monthly wage period, worked 26 days in March at ₹520 per day (₹13,520). His March payslip showed a uniform deposit of ₹600, canteen charges of ₹450 and a 'fine for late attendance' of ₹250; the net ₹12,220 was credited on 12 April. The canteen charge appears nowhere in his appointment letter, and the fine was imposed under a works committee resolution listing late attendance, without any show-cause notice to Gurmeet. The principal employer says the labour bill was already released to the contractor, so it bears no responsibility. Gurmeet files a claim before the Payment of Wages Authority in May.
1. Examine the legality of each deduction and state the amount refundable to Gurmeet.
Read the worked answer
Only the heads listed in section 7(2) of the Payment of Wages Act are deductible, and every deduction must be entered in the register under section 9.
- Uniform deposit (₹600): a security deposit is not a listed head. It survives only if a State rule specifically authorises it and the worker has consented in writing; neither is shown, so the deduction is unlawful.
- Canteen charges (₹450): a deduction for amenities or services needs State Government authorisation under section 7(2)(e) plus the worker's agreement. The appointment letter is silent, so the amount is refundable.
- Fine (₹250): section 8 requires a notified list of acts and omissions, a show-cause and an opportunity of hearing, imposition within 60 days, and a ceiling of 3% of the wage-period wages. Here 3% of ₹13,520 is ₹405.60, so the amount is within the cap, but a works committee resolution is not the prescribed notice, and no show-cause was issued. The fine fails on procedure.
Total deductions of ₹1,300 are below the 50% ceiling in section 7(3), but that does not cure illegality - the ceiling limits lawful deductions, it does not legalise unlawful ones. Refund payable: ₹1,300.
2. Against whom is the claim maintainable, before which authority, and what limitation and compensation apply? Also comment on the delayed credit of wages.
Read the worked answer
Forum and parties. The Authority under section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act (in Punjab, the notified Labour Officer/Assistant Labour Commissioner) has jurisdiction, since the Act covers factory employees. Both the contractor and the principal employer should be impleaded. Under section 21(4) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, if the contractor fails to pay wages, the principal employer must pay them and may recover the amount from the contractor. Release of the labour bill to the contractor is no defence; a suspended licence makes the principal employer's duty stronger, not weaker.
Limitation. Section 15(2) sets twelve months from the date the deduction was made or the wages fell due, condonable for sufficient cause. A claim filed in May for March wages is comfortably in time.
Delay in payment. For a monthly wage period in an establishment with fewer than 1,000 persons, section 5 requires payment before the 7th of the following month. Credit on 12 April is a breach.
Compensation. Section 15(3) allows compensation up to ten times the amount deducted (here up to ₹13,000) and, for delayed wages, up to ₹3,000 but not less than ₹1,500.