Correcting a Draft Public Notice Before Signature
A patwari has drafted the following notice for the village notice board and must clear it before the Tehsildar signs it:
NOTICE All the landowners of village Bhikhi are hereby informed that the land records of this village has been computerised. Any person who want a copy of the jamabandi may obtained it from the office of the Tehsildar on payment of the prescribed fee. Objections, if any, must be filed within thirty days, failing which the entries will be treated as final. The applicant should attached a proof of ownership.
The notice will later be translated into Punjabi, but the English text must be internally consistent because it will be read aloud at the panchayat meeting. The Tehsildar has asked for a corrected version that is grammatically sound, unambiguous and appropriately formal, and has warned that the notice must not promise more finality than the law gives to a mutation.
1. Identify and correct the grammatical errors in the draft, naming the rule involved in each case.
Read the worked answer
Four errors stand out:
'the land records of this village has been computerised' - subject-verb agreement. The subject is 'records' (plural), so it must be 'have been computerised'. The phrase 'of this village' is only a modifier and does not change the number.
'Any person who want a copy' - relative-clause agreement. 'Who' refers to 'person' (singular), so 'who wants'.
'may obtained it' - a modal verb takes the base form. 'May' + 'obtain', not 'obtained'.
'should attached' - again modal + base form: 'should attach'.
A fifth, stylistic point: 'a proof of ownership' is better as 'proof of ownership', since 'proof' is used uncountably here.
The corrected sentence: 'Any person who wants a copy of the jamabandi may obtain it from the office of the Tehsildar on payment of the prescribed fee.'
2. Rewrite the final two sentences in impersonal/passive form and explain why that register suits a public notice.
Read the worked answer
Possible rewrite: 'Objections, if any, shall be filed within thirty days. Every application shall be accompanied by proof of ownership.'
The passive or impersonal form is appropriate because a public notice speaks to an unknown and unlimited audience. 'The applicant should attach...' assumes a single identifiable applicant, whereas 'Every application shall be accompanied by...' makes the requirement a condition of the application itself, which is easier to enforce and harder to misread. It also avoids assigning personal blame or discretion to any official.
Note the choice of 'shall' rather than 'should': 'should' sounds advisory, while a filing requirement in a notice needs mandatory force. Consistency matters - mixing 'must', 'should' and 'may' in one notice invites the argument that some requirements are optional.
3. The draft says the entries 'will be treated as final'. Is that accurate, and how should it be reworded?
Read the worked answer
It overstates the position. A mutation is an entry in the revenue record; it is presumed correct until set aside, but it is not conclusive of title and is subject to objection, appeal and revision under the land revenue law, and ultimately to the decision of a civil court on title. Telling villagers the entries are 'final' after thirty days could mislead a person who has a genuine claim but no immediate documentary proof.
A safer wording is: 'Objections, if any, shall be filed within thirty days; thereafter the entries shall be presumed correct until lawfully set aside.' This preserves the deadline while stating the legal effect accurately.
This is the kind of judgement the notice tests: fluency in English is necessary, but the wording must also match the legal character of the record being published.