NRI Land Complaint, Shamlat Claim and a Wall Going Up
An email reaches the SHO of a police station in Ludhiana district from a Canada-based NRI, Harpreet, now 68. He says his ancestral 4 kanal of land in a village is recorded in the jamabandi in his name, but his cousin Gurdeep has cultivated it for the last 14 years and has now begun laying a brick boundary wall and a small room on part of it. Gurdeep's answer, given to the patwari, is that the land is shamlat belonging to the village and that in any case he has become owner by adverse possession. The panchayat says the land was never shamlat and points to an old civil court decree. Harpreet has sent a power of attorney in favour of his brother, a retired teacher in the same village with no local influence; a written complaint from the brother has been lying unsigned at the police station for nine days. Harpreet arrives in three weeks. The patwari's jamabandi shows Harpreet as owner and there is no stay order from any court.
1. Gurdeep says he is the owner by adverse possession and that the land is shamlat. What do those claims mean for the police?
Read the worked answer
Neither claim is a police question, but both affect what the police record.
- Adverse possession is a plea raised in a civil suit. It requires possession that is open, continuous, hostile and uninterrupted for twelve years (Article 65, Limitation Act, 1963). It is a defence to a suit, not a licence to build a wall while matters are pending.
- Shamlat character is decided by the Collector under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, not by a station house officer. If the land is shamlat deh vested in the panchayat, the panchayat's own record and the Collector's finding govern.
- A plea of adverse possession against panchayat or State land is ordinarily refused by the courts, so Gurdeep's version is weaker than it sounds - but that is for the Collector or the civil court to hold.
- The jamabandi entry showing Harpreet as owner is strong evidence of possession and is rebuttable; it is not a title decree.
- What the police can act on: the fresh construction and any suspected forgery. If a sale deed, power of attorney or mutation is suspected to be fabricated, that is a separate cognizable offence (forgery and using a forged document as genuine, corresponding to IPC Sections 465 and 471) to be investigated on its own evidence.
Record in the file that the adverse-possession claim is a civil plea, so that no one later says the police accepted it.
2. How would you manage the three weeks before Harpreet arrives, and which Punjab-specific channels would you use?
Read the worked answer
- Stop the friction, not the process. Put the spot on the beat constable's daily visit list, record the existing construction by dated photographs and a site plan, and inform both sides in writing that the law will take its course.
- Prevent a village-level flashpoint. If the brother and Gurdeep's men gather at the wall, treat it as a law-and-order posting and use the beat officer who knows both factions rather than an unfamiliar team.
- Use the Saanjh Kendra and the district NRI cell. Punjab Police's Saanjh network handles NRI and passport-related grievances and keeps a dated, traceable record, which heads off the standard complaint that 'the file was lost because he lives abroad'.
- Convene the thana-level police-public or village peace committee and get a signed status quo agreement on construction until the civil court or the Collector decides - a written undertaking is worth more than a verbal warning.
- Refer, do not abdicate. Give the brother the correct forums with a receipt: a civil suit for declaration and possession, and an application to the Collector under the 1961 Act on the shamlat question.
- Document everything on day one. NRI land disputes in Punjab run for decades and routinely end as allegations against the local police; a dated, signed paper trail is the officer's best protection.