RBSE SS Voc Retail study materials
RBSE SS Voc Retail study resources

Cash Short at Closing Time in an Udaipur Supermarket

RBSE SS Voc Retail · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Cash Short at Closing Time in an Udaipur Supermarket

It is 9:40 p.m. and the cashier at a supermarket in Udaipur is closing the till. The POS report shows collections of ₹1,86,400 for the day: cash ₹92,300, card ₹54,600, UPI ₹39,500. The physical cash counted comes to ₹90,450. Three problems occurred during the day. At 11 a.m. a customer's UPI app showed 'payment successful' for ₹1,240, but the POS recorded nothing; the customer was allowed to leave with the goods. At 4 p.m. the cashier accepted a ₹2,000 note that the supervisor now suspects is counterfeit. At 6 p.m. a bill for a mixer-grinder was raised at 5% GST instead of 18%, undercharging ₹312. Store policy says shortages above ₹1,000 must be reported the same night. The till float is ₹5,000, and the cashier is a three-month trainee working alone.

1. Reconcile the till and explain the possible causes of the gap. What exactly is the true cash position if the ₹2,000 note is counterfeit?

Read the worked answer

Reconciliation

  • POS total: 92,300 + 54,600 + 39,500 = ₹1,86,400 - the report is internally consistent.
  • Expected cash ₹92,300 − counted cash ₹90,450 = short by ₹1,850.

Cash position if the note is counterfeit The note is in the counted ₹90,450 but is worth nothing. True cash = 90,450 − 2,000 = ₹88,450, so the real shortfall is 92,300 − 88,450 = ₹3,850.

Likely causes, separated by evidence

  • Counterfeit note: accounts for ₹2,000 of the gap. Provable once the note is seized and examined.
  • Change errors: typical for a trainee, especially at peak hours; shows as small, uneven shortages.
  • Unrecorded cash sale or a missed line: the ₹1,240 UPI entry does not explain a cash gap - it is a UPI problem. If the customer actually paid and the POS missed it, the money is in the bank, not the drawer; the 1,240 is a recording gap, not a cash loss.
  • The ₹312 GST undercharge is a revenue/tax error, not a cash difference - the customer paid the billed amount.

Important: adding 1,850 + 1,240 + 312 and calling it a ₹3,402 loss is wrong. Different errors hit different accounts and must be tracked separately.

2. Rank the three incidents and say what must be done tonight and what can wait until tomorrow.

Read the worked answer

Tonight - in this order

  1. Secure the counterfeit note. Do not return it to the customer, do not put it back in the drawer, do not try to pass it on. Place it in an envelope marked with date, time, till number, cashier name and the transaction, and hand it to the supervisor. Passing a counterfeit knowingly is an offence; the correct route is the bank or police as per store procedure.
  2. Count again in the presence of a second person, complete the reconciliation sheet and record the ₹3,850 shortfall. Policy requires same-night reporting above ₹1,000, so this is not optional.
  3. Inform the manager and record the trainee's statement in her own words while events are fresh. She should not be accused or asked to pay on the spot.

Tomorrow

  • UPI ₹1,240: pull the merchant settlement statement and the customer's transaction reference. If the money was received, fix the POS/QR mapping and record the sale; if not, raise it with the payment service provider. Contact the customer politely with the reference, not with an accusation.
  • GST ₹312: the taxable value is 312 ÷ 0.13 = ₹2,400; 5% gives ₹120 and 18% gives ₹432. Issue a debit note or revised invoice, collect the differential and deposit the correct tax. Check whether other bills that day used the same wrong tax code.

Why this order: the counterfeit note is the only item that creates legal and reputational risk if it leaves the building. Cash and tax errors can be corrected; a circulated fake cannot.

3. Write the recovery plan: what should be reported, and what controls would prevent a repeat?

Read the worked answer

Report contents Reconciliation sheet signed by cashier and supervisor; day's collections by mode; counted cash; shortfall amount; statement of the three incidents with times, till numbers and bill numbers; counterfeit note seized and its handling; corrective actions; manager sign-off. Keep the note details in the incident log, not only in the cash book.

Controls

  • Two-person closing count for any cashier under six months, with a signed tally.
  • Mid-day cash pickups so the drawer never holds more than a set limit (for example ₹25,000); this caps both theft loss and counting errors.
  • Counterfeit checks at the point of receipt: UV lamp or pen for ₹500 and ₹2,000 notes, and a written rule that a doubtful note goes to the supervisor before change is given.
  • UPI confirmation before goods are released: use the soundbox or check the merchant app, never the customer's screen alone.
  • Locked tax and price masters: only the manager can change a GST rate, with a log.
  • Training and a fair process: retrain the trainee on change-making and note-checking. Recovery from wages should follow written policy and legal limits, not an informal 'you pay for it'.

Tone matters: a trainee who is publicly blamed will hide the next error. A trainee who is trained and told exactly what was wrong will report it. The aim is a till that reconciles, not a cashier who is afraid.