RPSC 2nd Grade Teacher study materials
RPSC 2nd Grade Teacher study resources

RPSC 2nd Grade Teacher: Pedagogy: Planning, Methods and Evaluation in the Chosen Subject

RPSC 2nd Grade Teacher · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Pedagogy: Planning, Methods and Evaluation in the Chosen Subject

This domain asks whether you can plan, deliver and measure a lesson in your own subject. Questions are situational: a described classroom, a stated learning objective, or a test result that you must interpret.

Planning

  • Herbartian five steps: preparation, presentation, comparison and association, generalisation, application.
  • Objectives written in behavioural terms with revised Bloom verbs (remember, understand, apply, analyse, evaluate, create) plus a measurable outcome.
  • A blueprint (table of specifications) balances content with objective level; without it, content validity cannot be claimed.

Methods and aids

  • Inductive (examples to rule) and deductive (rule to examples); heuristic method (Armstrong); project method (Kilpatrick); analytic and synthetic approaches in mathematics and grammar.
  • Self-paced variants: Dalton plan and programmed instruction (Skinner) with small frames, active response and immediate feedback.
  • Dale's cone of experience: move from concrete to abstract; an aid supports a method but is not itself a method.

Evaluation

Formative assessment happens during learning and feeds back into teaching; summative assessment closes a unit or term; diagnostic assessment locates the specific error for remediation. Criterion-referenced tests compare performance to a set standard, norm-referenced tests to the group.

Worked example

An item is attempted by 100 students; 80 answer it correctly, so the difficulty index p = 0.80, an easy item. In the upper 27% group (27 students) 24 are correct; in the lower 27% group 8 are correct, so D = (24 - 8) / 27 = 0.59, strong discrimination. Reasoning: p reports difficulty, D reports whether the item separates achievers from non-achievers. An item can be easy yet still useful, but an easy item with low D tells you nothing about learning.

Traps that cost marks

  • Calling a unit test formative; it is summative.
  • Swapping reliability (consistency) with validity (measuring the intended construct).
  • Assuming p = 0.9 is a good item; it is merely easy.
  • Naming a chart or model as a teaching method.