Two Interventions Only: Prioritising in a Drought-Prone Block
A block health team in a drought-prone taluk of Ramanathapuram district surveyed 480 children under five. Weight-for-age below -2 SD was found in 38%, and 11% were below -3 SD with visible wasting; two children had pitting oedema. Among 120 pregnant women, 68% had haemoglobin below 11 g/dL and 9% below 7 g/dL. Only 30% of households used adequately iodised salt, and 8% of children aged 6-12 years had visible goitre. Exclusive breastfeeding to six months was reported by only 20% of mothers, and most had introduced complementary foods only at 9-10 months, mainly as rice water. The team has funds for two priority interventions this year, not ten.
1. Choose the two interventions you would fund first, and justify the choice using prevalence, severity, cost-effectiveness and what the existing system can already deliver.
Read the worked answer
Priority 1: A first-1000-days feeding package - exclusive breastfeeding to six months plus timely, energy-dense complementary feeding from six months, delivered through ICDS. Reasoning: underweight prevalence of 38% with 11% severe and two oedema cases is the largest and most dangerous finding; severe acute malnutrition carries a real mortality risk. The drivers are visible in the data itself - 20% exclusive breastfeeding and complementary feeding beginning at 9-10 months with rice water, which is both late and energy-dilute. This is a behaviour and counselling intervention layered onto an existing platform (Anganwadi contacts, growth monitoring, Take Home Ration), so marginal cost is low and coverage is already structurally possible. Oedema cases need referral to a Nutrition Rehabilitation Centre immediately, regardless of budget.
Priority 2: Anaemia control in pregnancy - IFA supplementation, deworming, and testing with treatment of severe anaemia, linked to antenatal care. Reasoning: 68% prevalence with 9% below 7 g/dL means severe anaemia is common and is a direct contributor to maternal death, preterm birth and low birth weight - which in turn feeds the child undernutrition seen above. IFA and albendazole are among the cheapest proven interventions available, and the antenatal platform already exists.
Why iodised salt is third, not first: 8% visible goitre and 30% household coverage are serious, but salt iodisation is a supply-side measure that can be attached to the PDS and school feeding supply chain at marginal cost rather than consuming a whole intervention budget slot. The choice is about marginal cost per case prevented, not about which problem is least important. Note also that the two priorities are linked: preventing low birth weight reduces the next cohort of underweight children.
2. Show how your two priorities fit together across the life cycle, and identify the specific actions at each contact point.
Read the worked answer
The two priorities are the two ends of one continuous chain - the first 1,000 days, from conception to the child's second birthday.
Pregnancy (0-9 months)
- Register early for antenatal care; IFA daily and calcium supplementation as per protocol; deworming after the first trimester.
- Test haemoglobin at registration and again in the third trimester; treat severe anaemia (below 7 g/dL) as a medical priority, not a dietary one.
- Counselling on extra food and rest; ICDS supplementary nutrition and maternity benefit schemes.
0-6 months
- Initiate breastfeeding within one hour; exclusive breastfeeding for six months, no water, no ghutti, no bottle.
- The mother's own nutrition during lactation supports this.
6-24 months
- Start complementary feeding at six months - thick, energy-dense, locally made (mashed rice with dal and oil, ragi porridge, egg, mashed vegetables), 5-6 small feeds a day plus continued breastfeeding to two years.
- Growth monitoring at the Anganwadi with plotting on the growth card; weight-for-age is the trigger for counselling or referral.
- Vitamin A prophylaxis (first dose at 9 months, then six-monthly to five years) and deworming under the national programme.
Beyond two years
- Supplementary nutrition, iron-folic acid for adolescents, and iodised salt through PDS and school meals.
The logic to state explicitly: the anaemic pregnant woman is producing the low-birth-weight baby who becomes the wasted child. Funding these two ends together breaks that loop; funding either alone does not.
3. The panchayat asks how it will know in a year whether the money worked. Give measurable indicators, with a baseline from this survey and what each indicator would actually tell you.
Read the worked answer
Impact-level indicators (slow to move, report honestly)
- % of under-fives below -2 SD weight-for-age: baseline 38%; target a 3-5 percentage point reduction in one year - a large fall in twelve months would be implausible and should prompt a data-quality check.
- % below -3 SD: baseline 11%; target reduction and, critically, zero children with oedema left in the community - every oedema case must be referred and tracked.
Outcome-level indicators (these are the ones a one-year review can judge)
- % of mothers exclusively breastfeeding to six months: baseline 20%; target 50% or more.
- % of children aged 6-8 months receiving complementary feeds of adequate frequency and consistency: measure it directly, since the baseline shows late introduction of rice water.
- % of pregnant women with haemoglobin ≥11 g/dL at third trimester: baseline 68% below 11 g/dL; also track the number treated for haemoglobin below 7 g/dL.
- % of households using adequately iodised salt, tested with a salt testing kit in the household: baseline 30%.
Process indicators (early warning)
- Anganwadi attendance, growth cards plotted, IFA tablets actually consumed (not just distributed), deworming coverage, referral completion for severe acute malnutrition.
Two cautions to state: distribution figures are not consumption figures - a stock register showing IFA issued is not evidence that women took it. And the indicators should be reviewed monthly at the village health, sanitation and nutrition committee, not once at year-end, so that a weak component can be corrected while there is still time to spend the money.