Eutrophication, Fish Kills and a Lake Restoration Proposal
A lake near an industrial town is monitored monthly for three years. Dissolved oxygen in the hypolimnion falls from 6.8 mg/L to 3.2 mg/L; BOD rises from 2.1 to 8.4 mg/L; nitrate from 0.8 to 4.6 mg/L; chlorophyll-a from 8 to 42 µg/L; Secchi depth from 1.8 to 0.6 m. In summer, fish kills occur at dawn. The town discharges about 4 MLD of untreated sewage; agricultural runoff from 300 ha of fertilised fields enters the lake. The lake is also used for drinking water after conventional treatment and for religious bathing. A proposal recommends stocking the lake with tilapia and installing two floating fountains. The municipal council asks for a scientific opinion before funding.
1. Diagnose the lake's trophic status and identify the most likely cause of the oxygen decline and fish kills.
Read the worked answer
The trajectory is classic eutrophication. Chlorophyll-a rising from 8 to 42 µg/L, Secchi depth falling to 0.6 m and nitrate rising to 4.6 mg/L indicate high algal production and nutrient enrichment. The hypolimnetic oxygen decline and BOD rise show that organic matter is being decomposed, consuming oxygen. The dawn fish kills are consistent with nighttime respiration and decomposition continuing without photosynthesis; dissolved oxygen is lowest just before dawn. The most likely cause is the combination of untreated sewage and fertiliser runoff, which supplies nitrogen and phosphorus. Temperature stratification in summer worsens the problem by isolating the hypolimnion. The fish kills are therefore a symptom of oxygen depletion driven by nutrient loading, not simply a lack of fish or a need for more aeration.
2. Evaluate the proposed tilapia stocking and floating fountains as remedies.
Read the worked answer
The fountains would add oxygen locally and may prevent fish kills at the surface, but they do not reduce the external nutrient load, so algal production and organic decomposition would continue. Tilapia stocking is riskier: tilapia can recycle nutrients, increase turbidity, compete with native fish and escape into other waters. Neither measure addresses the sewage and agricultural runoff that are driving the problem. At best they are short-term emergency measures for a culturally or economically important lake, and even then they should be combined with continuous monitoring of dissolved oxygen. As a primary restoration strategy, they are not scientifically justified. The council should fund source control first: sewage treatment, diversion or constructed wetlands, and buffer strips or fertiliser management in the 300 ha catchment.
3. Propose a prioritised monitoring and management plan with measurable targets.
Read the worked answer
Priority 1 is reducing external loading: upgrade or divert the 4 MLD sewage discharge and establish vegetated buffers or nutrient-management agreements on the farmland. Priority 2 is monitoring: monthly dissolved oxygen, BOD, nitrate, chlorophyll-a and Secchi depth at inflow, mid-lake and outflow, with event sampling after heavy rain. Priority 3 is internal-load management, such as sediment assessment, only if external loading is controlled. Measurable targets could include raising minimum hypolimnetic dissolved oxygen above 5 mg/L, reducing chlorophyll-a below 15 µg/L, increasing Secchi depth above 1.2 m and lowering nitrate below 1.5 mg/L within three years. The plan should include a pre-project baseline, public reporting, and a review clause so that fountains or fish stocking are used only as temporary emergency measures if dissolved oxygen falls below a defined threshold.