TTD AE study materials
TTD AE study resources

A Fixed-Price CTV Deal That Costs More Than the Same Supply in the Open Market

TTD AE ยท Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A Fixed-Price CTV Deal That Costs More Than the Same Supply in the Open Market

Your client, a streaming service, has a $400,000 quarterly budget split between a private marketplace deal and the open exchange. The deal is with a CTV publisher via an SSP, entered as a deal ID at a fixed $28 CPM. After 30 days the deal has delivered 4.1 million impressions at $28, spending $114,800, with a 100% win rate and average frequency of 3.9 per household. The open exchange delivered 12.6 million impressions at an average $11.40 CPM.

You discover that the same publisher's CTV inventory is also available in the open exchange at roughly $16 CPM, and that the SSP routes the deal through a reseller path that adds an 18% fee. The client's blended eCPM is $19.60 and CPA has risen 34% quarter over quarter. The publisher insists the deal is "premium, brand-safe, guaranteed inventory" and offers a 5% CPM reduction to extend. Your client asks whether to renew, renegotiate, or walk.

1. How do you determine whether this deal is actually premium, rather than just labeled premium? Show the evidence you would require and how you would compare it to the open-market path.

Read the worked answer

Treat "premium" as a set of measurable properties, not a claim.

  • A 100% win rate at a fixed price means you are not competing - you are accepting all available supply at that price. That is normal for a fixed-price or guaranteed deal, but it also means the deal cannot signal quality by winning auctions. Quality has to be proven by the inventory itself.
  • Compare like with like: same publisher, same device type (CTV), same geography, same creative duration. Open-exchange CTV at $16 versus $28 is a 75% premium. The question is whether viewability, completion rate, IVT rate, content adjacency, and audience match are at least 75% better. Usually they are not, but you need the numbers.
  • Check the deal type. If it is programmatic guaranteed, there may be a take-or-pay commitment - that changes the decision from "is it efficient" to "what is the cost of exiting." If it is a preferred deal with no guarantee, you have no delivery obligation and no reason to pay a fixed premium.
  • Decompose the 18% reseller fee. Ask for the fee breakdown and log-level data. If the fee is being layered on top of an already-elevated CPM, working media is materially below $28.
  • Look at frequency. 3.9 per household on the deal versus the open path suggests the deal is adding repetition, not incremental reach. Pull unique reach by path, not just impressions.
  • Check conversion quality. A 34% CPA increase alongside rising CTV share should prompt a view-through versus click-through split. If the deal's conversions are heavily view-through, the efficiency comparison changes.

2. What supply-path and deal-structure actions would you take before the renewal decision, and what would make you walk away?

Read the worked answer

Actions before deciding:

  1. Separate the paths for reporting. Put the deal ID and open exchange in different ad groups so you can compare CPA, completion, viewability, and unique reach cleanly rather than relying on a blended eCPM.
  2. Eliminate self-competition. Suppress open-exchange bidding on the same publisher/SSP path, or use deal priority so you are not bidding against yourself for the same impression through two routes.
  3. Request a direct path. Ask the publisher to remove the reseller hop or expose the direct SSP seat. Removing an 18% fee at a $28 CPM is worth about $4.30 per thousand impressions before any CPM negotiation.
  4. Benchmark the negotiation. Anchor to the $16 open-market price for the same inventory. A credible ask is $17โ€“19 CPM with verified completion and viewability thresholds, or conversion to a private auction with a $14 floor and first look rather than a fixed price.
  5. Reduce committed volume. If the client wants to keep a brand-safe CTV buy, renew at a smaller commitment (e.g., 25โ€“30% of prior volume) while the open path carries the rest of the reach.

Walk criteria: completion rate and viewability not materially better than the open path; IVT or brand-safety reporting unavailable; the reseller fee cannot be disclosed or removed; frequency on the deal exceeds agreed caps; and incremental reach from the deal is near zero once open-exchange reach is removed. If most of those are true, the 5% discount is not a reason to stay - it is about $1.40 per thousand on inflated inventory.

3. Design the reporting and QA routine you would put in place to keep this decision honest over the next quarter.

Read the worked answer

Build a path-level scorecard reviewed weekly, not a single blended dashboard.

  • Delivery: impressions, spend, and eCPM by path (deal versus open), with win rate and bid rate. A 100% win rate on a fixed deal is expected; a 100% win rate appearing elsewhere is a red flag.
  • Quality: completion rate, viewability, IVT, and content-category breakdown by path. These are the metrics that justify a premium, so they must be reported at the same granularity as price.
  • Reach and frequency: unique households and frequency distribution by path, plus de-duplicated total reach. This is where the incremental value of the deal actually shows up.
  • Conversions: click-through and view-through conversions reported separately, with the attribution window documented, plus CPA by path. A rising view-through share can make a bad deal look efficient.
  • Supply path transparency: a supply-path report showing which SSPs and reseller hops are involved, their fees, and whether the same publisher is reachable through multiple routes.
  • QA checkpoints: confirm deal ID is live and correctly mapped, bid requests are actually carrying the deal ID, no duplicate bidding against the same supply, and pacing is not being distorted by the deal's fixed price.

Decision rule to agree in advance: if the deal's quality metrics are not at least proportionate to its CPM premium over the open path after 30 days, shift budget at the next monthly review rather than waiting for the quarterly renewal. Pre-agreeing this prevents the premium from becoming permanent by inertia.