Vetting a District GK Booklet: Density, Forest Cover and the 'Highest Peak' Claim
You are the content verifier for a 40-page booklet, 'Uttarakhand at a Glance', to be distributed at a free mock-test camp in Pauri. A junior assistant submits four statements, each with a source tag, and the printer's deadline is tomorrow evening. The working figures supplied to you are: Census 2011 population of Uttarakhand 1,00,86,292; geographical area 53,483 sq km; all-India population density 382 persons per sq km; forest cover 24,305 sq km as per the India State of Forest Report; Nanda Devi 7,816 m and Kamet 7,756 m. The four statements are: (S1) 'With a density of 189 persons per sq km, Uttarakhand is more crowded than India as a whole.' (S2) 'Forest cover is 45.4 per cent of the geographical area, that is about 0.24 hectare of forest per person.' (S3) 'Forest cover is 71 per cent, the highest among Indian states' - source, an undated tourism blog. (S4) 'Kamet, at 7,756 m, is the highest peak of the state' - source, an undated gazetteer extract.
1. Check statements S1 and S2 arithmetically and state exactly which part of each statement survives verification.
Read the worked answer
S1 - number survives, conclusion fails. 1,00,86,292 ÷ 53,483 = 188.59, which rounds to 189. So the density figure is correct. But 189 is roughly half of 382, not more. The defensible sentence is: 'Uttarakhand's population density (189 per sq km) is about half the national average (382).' The junior has attached a false comparative to a correct number, which is the commonest error in GK booklets.
S2 - both parts survive.
- Forest share: 24,305 ÷ 53,483 = 0.4544, i.e. 45.4 per cent.
- Per capita forest: 24,305 sq km × 100 = 24,30,500 hectares; ÷ 1,00,86,292 persons = 0.241 hectare, i.e. about 0.24 ha. The unit conversion (1 sq km = 100 ha) is the step most candidates and junior assistants miss; without it the per capita answer comes out 100 times too small.
Caution to print alongside: arithmetic density conceals terrain. In a hill state most of the area is steep or forested, so a low average density does not mean low pressure on habitable land. One line of this qualification raises the quality of the booklet.
2. Rule on statements S3 and S4, and state the publication rule you would apply before the file goes to the printer.
Read the worked answer
S3 - reject. An undated blog gives no reference year, no methodology and no citation to the Forest Survey of India. The figure 71 per cent does not match the state's forest cover and cannot be traced; the correct share is 45.4 per cent. Publishing it would put an unverifiable number into a study aid that students will memorise. The statement is removed, not 'adjusted' to fit.
S4 - factually wrong, so rewrite. Nanda Devi (7,816 m) is higher than Kamet (7,756 m); Kamet stands in Chamoli district on the India–Tibet border. The precise and defensible wording is: 'Nanda Devi (7,816 m) is the highest peak lying wholly within Indian territory; Kamet (7,756 m), on the India–Tibet border, is the second highest in Uttarakhand.' The qualifier 'wholly within Indian territory' matters, because Kamet's summit position is a border question.
Publication rule: two dated official sources per factual claim (Census of India, India State of Forest Report, Survey of India, state gazetteer of known edition); record year and table/page in a source register; anything unverifiable is flagged 'needs review' and dropped before printing. A deadline never converts an unverified claim into a verified one.