Severe headache at 34 weeks in a remote HWC
You are the Community Health Officer at a Health and Wellness Centre in a rural block of Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh. On a Tuesday morning, Rekha, 28 years old, G3 P2 L2, at 34 weeks by her last menstrual period, comes in with her mother-in-law. She reports a severe headache since the previous night and blurred vision. Her blood pressure is 152/104 mmHg on repeat after ten minutes of rest; urine dipstick shows 1+ protein; she has no convulsions. Both previous deliveries were at home. The HWC has no ultrasound, no magnesium sulphate, and the ANM is on leave. The CHC is 22 km away. The 108 ambulance is delayed and mobile network is weak. The mother-in-law insists on taking Rekha home for a puja, saying hospital delivery is expensive. Rekha's haemoglobin is 9.8 g/dL. The ASHA is present. It is 10:40 a.m. and 14 patients are waiting.
1. What is the most likely diagnosis, and what should you do in the next 30 minutes at the HWC? Explain the reasoning behind each action.
Read the worked answer
The picture fits pre-eclampsia with severe features. BP is above 140/90 on repeat after rest, there is 1+ proteinuria after 20 weeks, and new headache with blurred vision are warning symptoms. The diastolic pressure of 104 and the symptoms make this an emergency even though the BP is not yet 160/110.
Actions in the next 30 minutes:
- Place her in a quiet area, left lateral position, and repeat BP after rest; check deep tendon reflexes and clonus, urine output, and fetal heart if a Doppler is available.
- Arrange immediate referral to the CHC/FRU, not home. Delivery is the definitive treatment, and eclampsia can occur without warning.
- If the state NHM protocol authorises a pre-referral antihypertensive and it is available, give it; if magnesium sulphate is not stocked or you are not trained and authorised to use it, do not spend time searching for it. Refer without delay.
- Send a referral note with gestation, BP readings, proteinuria, haemoglobin, drugs given, and the time of referral. Keep the ASHA with the family.
- Do not give sedatives or false reassurance, and do not advise home rest as an alternative.
The reasoning is that the main risk is not the headache itself but progression to eclampsia, abruption, or fetal compromise. At a facility without magnesium sulphate or delivery services, the safest action is rapid transfer, not observation.
2. The mother-in-law refuses hospital referral. How would you handle the conversation and the logistics, and what would you do if the family still refuses?
Read the worked answer
I would separate the clinical urgency from the family dispute. First, I would ask the ASHA to speak with the mother-in-law in the local language and acknowledge her fear about cost. Then I would explain concretely: Rekha has a condition that can cause fits, bleeding, or stillbirth, and these can start suddenly; the CHC can manage her and delivery there is free under JSSK, including referral transport. I would offer the 108 ambulance and, if it is delayed, ask the ASHA to arrange the available vehicle through the VHSNC while I continue monitoring.
I would not argue about the puja or accuse the family of neglect. I would say the puja can continue after she is assessed, but the medical danger cannot wait. If Rekha is conscious and competent, I would ask her directly what she wants, because her consent matters and she may be under family pressure.
If the family still refuses, I would document the refusal, the risks explained, and the names of those present; inform the Medical Officer or ANM by phone or message; keep Rekha under observation while trying again; and give a written referral slip with danger signs. I would not forcibly detain her, but I would escalate because this is a life-threatening condition. The ASHA should follow up the same day if the family returns home.
3. What records and reports would you complete, and what follow-up would you arrange if she delivers at the CHC?
Read the worked answer
I would record the BP readings, proteinuria, symptoms, haemoglobin, referral decision, time of referral, vehicle used, and drugs given in the referral slip, the MCP card, and the HWC high-risk pregnancy register. The ASHA's line list should be updated so that the block team knows she was referred. If she goes to the CHC, I would ask the ASHA to confirm the outcome and enter it in the register rather than leaving the referral open.
After delivery, follow-up should include BP monitoring, danger-sign counselling, haemoglobin review, and family planning advice. Because she had pre-eclampsia, she remains at risk in the postpartum period, so the ASHA should visit within the first week and watch for severe headache, blurred vision, bleeding, and fever. I would also report the referral and outcome through the routine HMIS/MCH reporting format used in the block.
The reasoning is that a referral is not complete until the outcome is known. Recording only the referral hides whether the woman actually reached care, and it prevents the block from acting on a failed referral pathway.